If there is evidence then yes. I just see a pattern of claims against him but nothing of substance. This is just another attempt to try and get/keep votes for the dems. The IRS itself has been on top of trump for the last 30 years with no substantive problems. This means there is nothing illegal regarding his taxes. Tump and people around him have been investigated for 2 years. Nothing illegal was found regarding Trump. No evidence was found of him colluding with Putin. These 3 things were the main points dems talked about for impeachment of trump. This is a pattern of trying and failing and this next attempt is bs and will fail.

 

I'll let you know when we will get worried, right now, it's not in the stars.

 

Impeached for what, exactly?

 

GAWD DAMMIT...SOMETHING!!!!

 

I know this comes as a shock to those people whose mom raised them to think the world revolved around them, but sadly the Truth is, I and almost all other people have no interest in hearing from a complete stranger how they feel. Please people, If you take anything at all from these ridiculous exchanges please NOTE! The level of egomania here is really beyond belief. Funny isn't it...Do we know anyone else who is an egomaniac?
Oh god do we ever!!!

 

This is the poll of Trump's popularity I access:

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/e...p_job_approval-6179.html?mobile_redirect=true

As long as Trump's average rating is in the low 40's percent there is really no point in trying to impeach him. His approval rating needs to be in the low 30's percent for impeachment to be even thinkable. Republican politicians need to think that Trump is so unpopular that his presidency makes it difficult for them to be re elected or elected. Shortly before Nixon resigned even Goldwater told him it was time to go. We are not nearly there yet.

Until then Democrats should try to keep Trump from doing too much harm. They should try to peel off some of Trump's supporters. Although Trump has always been an unpopular president, my sense of things is that his supporters support him with more enthusiasm than his opponents oppose him.

Trump's coalition includes constituencies that fear that historical trends are moving against them. Christian Conservatives fear a society that is becoming increasingly secular and hedonistic. White blue collar workers fear losing factory jobs to foreign workers or industrial robots. Businessmen fear the growing popularity of socialism.

These groups are likely to stay with Trump regardless of any Trump scandals that are exposed.

 

Well, its gonna take more lies to get Trump.

A LOT more lies.

Or, intentionally wrecking the economy.


Oh, wait. There it is.
States passing laws that require presidential candidates to release their tax reports.

Uh oh. That means Pelosi is out.

 

As to the Question NO for gods sake NO! I do not want him impeached! and I'm sure the senate wouldn't go along! Not that anyone gives a damn about anyone's opinions here..
The Trump faithful would forever claim that had a few in Government not impeached Trump, he would have gone on to be greater than God, and who wants to listen to that stupid shit for the next 10 years.
I Really want to see his sorry dumb ass screaming his brains out the day after the election as well as for the period up to Jan 21st 2021 ! I cant wait to hear all the ridiculous excuses and lies he misspells, as well as hear the fevered pitch of his voice demanding armed Trump lovers should surround the capital and prevent a newly elected president from taking office. ...Hell we might even have a few dozen assholes show up in camos with their AK47s and ammo belt slung over their shoulders in their True wannabe real soldiers gear. Something almost all of them managed to "Avoid" during their younger years!
I do look forward to November 2020, and the aftermath.

 

Eighteen states have considered legislation this year that would require presidential and vice presidential candidates to post their tax returns to appear on the ballot during a primary or general election, according to data from the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).

Similar attempts have been made by states since Trump was elected. In 2017, Dan Diorio, policy specialist in NCSL, noted that at least 25 state legislatures put forward such bills. “Nearly every bill has been introduced by Democrats, in reaction to President Donald Trump’s refusal to release his tax returns as per the custom of previous presidential candidates,” he wrote of the 2017 legislation

 

It is always possible that Trump will be reelected in a landslide in the Electoral College, with a comfortable margin of victory in the popular vote. I remember when Nixon and Reagan did that.

It will be interesting to see what happens if Trump loses fairly, claims a rigged election, and refuses to leave office.

 

Actually it will be nearly impossible for the leftists/socialist candidates to win an election on substance.

 

I guess that is why Republican presidential candidates keep promising to cut taxes, raise defense spending and balance the budget. When will they learn that can't be done?

Why did Trump make the preposterous promise that he could not only balance the budget, but he could pay off the entire national debt in eight years?

Speaking of stupid promises, why did Trump promise that Mexico would pay for his wall?

 

As the old adage goes...''how do you keep a blonde in suspense?...never tell 'em''

 

One thing about Trump, hes doing what he said he would.

Its refreshing to find a politician keeping promises for once.

Course, its driving despicables nuts, but thats just an added benefit.

 

I question the wisdom of an impeachment that would surely fail in the Senate. I also don't think Mike Pence would be much better in the Oval Office than Trump and would probably be harder to beat in 2020. All things considered, I would prefer that Trump gets his ass handed to him in the next election. If the Dems lose in 2020, nothing else matters.

 

Really? What about this?

----------

The Weekly Standard, April 4, 2016

In a weekend interview with the Washington Post, the GOP candidate for president said he could [pay of the national debt] "over a period of eight years", citing trade policy as his wrecking ball.

"I'm renegotiating all of our deals, the big trade deals that we're doing so badly on. With China, $505 billion this year in trade. We're losing with everybody," he told reporter Bob Woodward.

When asked, Trump said he didn't "think" he'd need to consider tax increases to accomplish his goal. (Woodward didn't ask if there was any spending Trump would cut.)

"The power is trade. Our deals are so bad," Trump stated.

----------

This promise is not as well known as Trump's promise that Mexico would pay for his wall, but it is just as preposterous.

Here is another promise Trump made:

----------

CNN Transcripts

TAPPER: You recently spoke about President Trump's budget. And you said -- quote -- "We are taking his words and turning them into policies and dollars."

I want to follow up on that, because there were a lot of words said during the campaign. So, the president one time said that he believed taxes should actually go up on the wealthy. Take a listen.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

QUESTION: Do you believe in raising taxes on the wealthy?

TRUMP: I do. I do, including myself. I do.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1703/12/sotu.01.html

----------

What happened to that promise?

Trump has a con man's intuition to tell his audience what it wants to hear. It is difficult to tell when he is lying and when he is so delusional that he believes his fabrications.

 

And shooter has said before that Trump needs to get cracking on the debt.

You can concentrate on what hasn't changed (yet) or you can concentrate on what he's accomplishing, or you can grade him on all of it.

Trump is keeping his promises.

 

In my previous comment I demonstrated that he is not keeping three of his promises.

 

Most Republican politicians, and the Republican donor class - which is rich enough not to need them - would love to slash or eliminate middle class entitlements. These are the most popular items in the federal budget. Republican politicians fearfully refer to them as "the third rail." The third rail on a subway is the rail that carries the electricity. Republican politicians know that if they touch middle class entitlements they will get a terrible shock. No Republican politician running anywhere in the United States could be elected or reelected if he or she campaigned on promises to cut or eliminate middle class entitlements.

Republican politicians know that, so they make vague promises to cut "waste, fraud, and abuse," to "put the government on a diet, etc., or they make the dishonest claim that tax cuts generate so much economic growth that they pay for themselves. Trump's promise to pay off the entire national debt in eight years with "better trade deals" is the most preposterous lie of all.

The most expensive middle class entitlements are Social Security and Medicare. These were in place before the Reagan Administration. I have pointed out on several occasions that from the end of the Second World War to the inauguration of the Reagan administration the national debt as a percentage of gross domestic product declined. It declined during the wars in Korea and Vietnam.

It has only been with the beginning of Republican tax cuts, especially for rich people and corporations, that the national debt has become a national problem. No amount of Republican sophistry can change that simple fact.

 

Despicables like to use scare tactics like saying deplorables will cut benefits if they get the chance.

All this demonstrates is that what government gives, government can take away.

Eliminating things like the ability to collect both social security disability and unemployment at the same time and getting rid of useless government separtments like education will help.

Almost $1 Trillion of our annual debt is attributable to failed Obamacare. Controling ILLEGAL imigration will cut medicaid and school roles that are high cost.

The bottom line is that government must stop spending like drunken sailors on liberty.

No matter who is in the oval office or who controls Congress.