"This was a recorded message. "

 

Attorney diGenova says fraud, deception in Pa. election is ‘truly staggering’

In an exclusive interview, attorney Joe diGenova, a member of the President’s legal team examining election irregularities, said the amount of election fraud and deception in Pennsylvania is “truly staggering.”

One America’s John Hines has more.

 

CNN denies voting fraud, despite own reports from 2006 warning it was ‘national security risk’



OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 7:55 PM PT – Wednesday, November 25, 2020
CNN continues denying the possibility of voter fraud in the 2020 elections. However, footage from their own reporting reveals they previously considered voting fraud a “national security issue.” One America’s Pearson Sharp has more.

 

OAN is fake news!

 

OAN's fairytale factory is working overtime.

 

On Thanksgiving eve, President Trump called into a news conference held by his allies in a Gettysburg, Pa., hotel, yet again falsely claiming that Joe Biden stole the presidential election. The presidential rant lasted less than 10 minutes, but Trump still managed to squeeze in at least 15 false or misleading statements. Here’s a rundown of his falsehoods.
“This was an election that we won easily. … This election was rigged, and we can’t let that happen. We can’t let it happen for our country. … This election was lost by the Democrats. They cheated. It was a fraudulent election.”

Trump lost decisively, with Biden earning 306 electoral votes to Trump’s 232. That’s the same margin that Trump had when he defeated Hillary Clinton in 2016, in what he repeatedly called a “landslide.” Many key swing states have already certified the results, with Biden’s margin of victory in some key states significantly higher than Trump’s margin four years ago. For instance, Biden won Michigan by more than 150,000 votes, compared with Trump’s margin of about 11,000 in 2016.

“We won Pennsylvania by a lot, and we won all of these swing states by a lot.”
Again, Biden’s margin of victory in Pennsylvania — more than 80,000 votes — was almost twice as wide as Trump’s margin in 2016.

“I was called by the biggest political people, ‘Congratulations, sir, on a big win.’ And all of a sudden ballots were dumped all over the place.”
Regular readers know that Trump’s use of the word “sir” is a tell that he’s probably recounting an invented conversation. The “biggest political people” all knew that in several key states such as Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, absentee ballots would be reported later because state rules would not allow pre-canvassing of absentee or mail-in ballots before Election Day.

“We have poll watcher affidavits piled up to the ceiling. They’re all over. They were treated horribly all over this. … The poll watchers weren’t allowed to watch. They were, in many cases, whisked out of the room, not only in pens that were 20, 30, 40, 60, 100 feet away where you couldn’t even see.”
Affidavits can be offered as evidence but they are not established as fact until a judge or jury decides they are facts. In virtually all cases, the affidavits submitted by

the Trump campaign and its allies have been dismissed by judges as failing to demonstrate serious fraud. Many simply reported complaints about rude behavior or unpleasant looks from poll workers or Democratic poll watchers. In other words, Trump keeps repeating claims that have already been rejected in court.
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, for instance, ruled against Trump in a 5-2 decision Nov. 17, finding that local election officials legally exercised their power in setting up a waist-high barrier and buffer zone of 15 to 18 feet between the campaign observers and the election workers inside the Philadelphia convention center. The state Supreme Court opinion stated that these conditions “allowed candidate representatives to observe the Board conducting its activities as prescribed under the Election Code.”

“If you were a Republican poll watcher, you were treated like a dog. And the Democrats had no problem. But they were rough. They were literally pushed out. And it was rough tactics.”

Trump’s legal team has failed to prove this. In Michigan, Politico reported, even as the state Republican chair tweeted that GOP poll watchers were being blocked from entering the TCF Center in Detroit, where absentee ballots were being counted, “at the time of her tweet, several hundred of her party’s poll challengers, attorneys and representatives were already inside the TCF Center monitoring the count.”

“We have many, many cases, many, many cases of people walking in. A woman, an elderly woman, walks in looking forward to voting November 3rd and says, ‘Oh, good, where would I go about voting?’ ‘I’m sorry, you’ve already voted. Your ballot is in.’ She said, ‘No, I didn’t vote.’ ‘No, your ballot is in. You’ve already voted.’ In all cases for Biden, by the way … and then they gave her a provisional ballot to sign, which goes nowhere.”

This is another fairy tale. Trump’s chief lawyer, former New York mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, has suggested that 17,000 provisional ballots were cast in Pittsburgh because Democrats had already cast fraudulent ballots on behalf of someone who unexpectedly turned up to vote. But there is no evidence that is the case; instead, there were a variety of issues, such as a missing signature on a form, that cause a provisional ballot to be used.

“We won this election by a lot. We got 74 million votes.”
Trump may have received almost 74 million votes — but Biden has earned more than 80 million. That’s a margin of nearly 4 percent, and the gap is expected to keep growing as votes are still being counted in New York and California, two Biden strongholds. Biden’s margin in the popular vote is now larger than Barack Obama’s victory in 2012 and George W. Bush’s victory in 2004.

“We got many votes more than Ronald Reagan had when he won 49 states.”

This is a dumb comparison. The U.S. population is now almost 40 percent larger than in 1984, when Reagan defeated Walter Mondale. The voter turnout was also higher in 2020 than in 1984.

“All you have to do is take a look at the numbers at 10 o’clock in the evening, when everybody thought the election was virtually over. And very weird things happen. But they’re not weird to professionals, and they’re not weird to Dominion and other people that operate machines.”

Here, Trump slips in a reference to the debunked conspiracy theory that emerged from the fever swaps of the Internet. Dominion Voting Systems, which makes voting machines that local governments use to help run their elections, was founded in Canada but now effectively has its headquarters in Denver. Trump’s allies have falsely claimed the Dominion machines are under the control of software made by a company linked to the Venezuelan government that is designed to change election results. That’s all nonsense, but it’s still jarring to see a president embrace such fantasies as plausible.

“They’re not weird to the people that handle the ballots where they were flooding the market. People were getting two and three and four ballots in their home.”

Trump continues to baselessly malign mail-in voting. It’s illegal to vote more than once in an election, and in some states, it’s a felony. Some states mailed ballots to all registered voters, accounting for 51 million voters combined, while some other states mailed ballot applications, accounting for 49 million voters, according to a Washington Post tally. In other states, residents needed to make a request for a ballot or had no option but in-person voting unless they met certain requirements.

“People that were dead were signing up for ballots. Not only were they coming in and putting in a ballot, but then people were requesting ballots, and they were dead for years, and they were requesting valid ballots.”

The Trump campaign has been repeatedly caught making false allegations that dead people had voted, but that has not stopped Trump from repeating the claim. In one case, the widow of a deceased man had cast her ballot with a “Mrs.” prefix before her husband’s name, a style that went out of fashion in the 1970s. In another case, a dead person did not vote but someone with a very similar name had voted legally. Other alleged cases of dead voters also did not pan out.

“We have judges that are afraid to make a decision. … Why wouldn’t they overturn an election?”

Judges in numerous states have repeatedly made decisions, dismissing Trump’s claims as unproven or fiction. There is indeed a high bar for a judge to nullify an election, but the president’s slapdash legal effort has further undermined his case. U.S. District Judge Matthew W. Brann, a conservative previously active in Pennsylvania Republican circles, dismissed Trump’s effort in the state as a “Frankenstein’s Monster … haphazardly stitched together.” He said Trump’s legal team offered “strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations,” noting that the request to throw out nearly 7 million votes “is simply not how the Constitution works.”

“You look at the things that happened in Detroit, where you have a voter, but you have more votes than you have voters.”

This is false. There were more registered voters than actual voters. Trump appears to be referring to a debunked claim about over-votes of as much as 300 percent in some precincts in Wayne County. That was based on an affidavit filed in a since-dismissed Georgia case that bizarrely mixed up Michigan and Minnesota, so the precincts in question were actually from some of the reddest parts of Minnesota. Moreover, the number of voters matched the number of votes cast in those precincts.
That’s another example of the incompetence of the president’s legal team. But its repeated mishaps and failures apparently have not yet reached the president’s ears.

“They went absolutely wild because we got far more votes than they thought possible. And they’ve just stepped on the gas, and they got caught, just like they got caught spying on my campaign.”

The president here is channeling the deranged theory offered by Sidney Powell — who was fired from the president’s legal team — that an “algorithm” in Dominion machines manipulated by Democrats switched votes from Trump to Biden. She further claimed it broke down because support was so strong for Trump, forcing Democrats to use a “backdoor” method to manipulate the vote with mail-in ballots slipped in during the dark of night. Again, none of this happened, just as the president’s claims that Obama spied on his campaign have remained firmly in the realm of fantasy.

The Pinocchio Test

The president continues to embarrass himself — and the nation — by embracing false and half-baked claims about voter fraud in the 2020 election. He earns Four Pinocchios.
Four Pinocchios

 

Nevada court allows GOP to present potential evidence of voter fraud

In an apparent victory for the Trump campaign to re-elect the President, a judge in Nevada has allowed for the Republican Party to produce evidence of alleged voter fraud and irregularities. The move may potentially reverse Joe Biden’s win and set an example for other state challenges.

Officials in the Trump campaign, a judge set a December 3 hearing date and is allowing 15 depositions. The campaign intends to present evidence that could result in the rejection of tens of thousands of mail-in ballots in Clark County, which has a Democratic majority. In the initial count, ballots for Joe Biden outnumbered Trump by at least 91,000.

The news remains widely unreported by the mainstream media eager to declare an unofficial victory for Joe Biden in the state.

Posting on Twitter, White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows stated that Republicans in the state will be allowed to present findings of “widespread voter fraud.”

“BIG news in Nevada: a Judge has allowed NV Republicans to present findings of widespread voter fraud in a Dec. 3rd hearing. Americans will now hear evidence from those who saw firsthand what happened—a critical step for transparency and remedying illegal ballots. Stay tuned,” he wrote.

Conservative lobbyist Matt Schlapp, chairman of the American Conservative Union, is heading the case in Nevada.

“It gives us a real chance, if to do nothing else, to begin to show this historic level of fraud,” said Schlapp to the Washington Examiner.

The Trump team contends that non-residents and the deceased voted in the 2020 election in Nevada, and that signatures of hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were not verified by human officials, as is required by law.


The Trump team also claims that it “found that officials used a machine to verify signatures, apparently against the rules, and even those machines were plagued with problems,” according to the Washington Examiner. “The campaign also has testimony from a blind person who claims somebody else voted for her and that she was barred from voting as a result. And they plan to present evidence that Native Americans were offered bribes of TVs and gas cards for their vote.”

 

Sure...2006, lets go back even a bit further, hows 'bout 2005?

That was when former President Jimmy Carter co chaired a voting fraud committee, claiming that absentee ballots were ripe for fraud, as of now, there have been adequate measure and safe guards put in place to prevent such fraud...like verifying signatures and making a written request to obtain an absentee ballot.

As it is, mail in ballots are not legislated in an identical manner as absentee ballots.

Every address in the State can get an absentee ballot...without any legal verification of being a registered voter.

 

Republicans are about the dumbest of humans on the planet . And definitely the most spineless . And out numbered by even dummer Democrats . This election reminds of George Bush looking weapons of mass destruction . Did Trump win yes without a doubt, and we all know that especially the Democrats . But no one has the time or the money to fight , the club behind the illusion. I blind person could see this coming . I laugh at the stupidity . As I said those think they won will hurt the most . And now will have no chance of ever getting ahead . Or living a comfortable life .

 

@Truthful 1
What will be the name of donnie's new political party?...

 

This wasn't a "hearing" it was a press conference peddling the same false accusations of voter fraud.

 

Silky thighs must live off the government in someway or she is a public school teacher . I’m real sure

 

Are you saying the "Witnesses" aren't sworn in and testifying under oath in a session of the State of Pennsylvania Legislature? As the article implies?