1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. redeyed

    redeyed Porn Star

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,440
    That statement is exactly why our government is unlikely to change.
     
    #61
  2. prtndr

    prtndr Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,082
    Apparently you don't understand the two parties. Neither one is extreme. They are not black and white. Oh, there are extreme members of each, but each represents a large range of voters, from the extreme to the just-barely. There's a large number of voters who are registered to one party, but vote for whomever they feel the best candidate is, regardless of party affiliation.
     
    #62
  3. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    I had to come all the way back to this thread because the Great prtndr says I'm a bully and a coward because he "called me out on this thread and I did not respond to him. Well never wanting to disappoint someone who just wants a personal pissing contest here I am.

    Well I never said any such thing which means this is something you're making up in your own head prtndr.

    No that's not right. In fact its dead wrong and what you are trying to do is make up something you wish I had said in your own head and then try and make me argue you own inventions.

    What I said is I think this nation would be better off if people were not allowed to spread misinformation and what amounts to lies on the public airways.

    What I object to is people on public airways and mass media knowingly and deliberately spreading false information and misconceptions. I used the example of people saying that what Barack Obama is proposing for health care reform is socialism.

    Now here is Webster's definition of socialism.


    • Date: 1837
    1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
    2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
    3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done


    You show me anything in Barack Obama's health care reform that meets that definition.


    If you can't then the people claiming that Barack Obama is proposing socalism are not reaching a different conclusion. They are ignorant at best and lying at worst and guilty of spreading misinformation designed solely to create a false impression.



    No we wouldn't have to do any such thing and its really stupid to try and contend that we would. We already have laws against libel, slander and truth in advertising.

    But the better example is:

    "Shouting fire in a crowded theater" is a frequent misquoting of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.'s opinion in the United States Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States in 1919. The misquote fails to mention falsely shouting fire to highlight that speech which is merely dangerous and false which can be distinguished from truthful but also dangerous. The quote is used as an example of speech which serves no conceivable useful purpose and is extremely and imminently dangerous so that resort to the courts or administrative procedures is not practical and expresses the permissible limitations on free speech consistent with the terms of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shouting_fire_in_a_crowded_theater

    That's what I compare a lot of what goes on in our mass media on both sides. And my objection is that it makes large segements of the public ignorant of the true facts and creates potential danger as we have seen over the past few months. When there should be come responsibility to now knowingly lie or misinform people.

    Well I don't know who you think you're talking to or about here prtndr but if you're talking about me then your just lying again. I do not want to restrict free speech I want to promote truth and facts and restrict people from deliberately and knowingly misleading or misinforming people using public airways.

    And I think that fits me perfectly. Show me anywhere were knowingly and delibertely lying or creating false impressions is part of our individual freedoms.;

    Now let's look at this statement for a minute prtndr because you are actually doing what you falsely accuse me of. Ancient Red agreed with at least part of what I said. Not in total, but in part, so your only response it to personally attack him and try to insult him because he agreed with me.

    So actually what you're doing is attacking anyone who disagrees with YOU.

    No just like your statement here can be proven false, the charge that Barack Obama's health care proposals or the charge that Barack Obama is a socialist can be proven false by simply looking at the defintion of socialism. Words have meanings and there for can pass a true or false test.

    No its not opinion. Its a knowingly and deleberately false charge which is not protected free speech. Its also what you're doing here. Making false accusations about what I've said and essentially lying about me and my position. That's not protected free speech under the first amendment libel and slander are already against the law and have been for nearly two centuries.

    Now are you happy prtndr, that I took the time to come back here because you in all your internet toughness "called me out."

    See you tomorrow tough guy.:kiss:;)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 1, 2009
    #63
  4. Jessicat

    Jessicat Sex Lover

    Joined:
    May 9, 2009
    Messages:
    103

    see me right now, Mr LotsaSmarts!!! :kiss: :rose: :kiss: :rose: :kiss:

    you know you want me!
     
    #64
  5. Anonomus

    Anonomus Sex Machine

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    801
    wtf is it with American's and hating on France? France is awesome, I'd personally far prefer to be there than America.
     
    #65
  6. Jessicat

    Jessicat Sex Lover

    Joined:
    May 9, 2009
    Messages:
    103

    especially all that french kissing, baby :kiss: :kiss: :kiss:

    show me there's a real man around here ;)
     
    #66
  7. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    I just might but I've been burned by so many socks on this forum I hope you can understand why I'd like to get to know you first.

    So Jessicat what's up besides me?
     
    #67
  8. cdsj64

    cdsj64 Porno Junky

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Messages:
    314
    Good for America

    I think we need to eliminate the Democrats and Republic money hungry and elect a new political party. There are more then just those two. Why is it that we only hear about the Democrats.

    P.S. I'm sorry I voted for Obama. Beat me!!!
     
    #68
  9. Kitty Lynn

    Kitty Lynn Sex Lover

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2009
    Messages:
    211

    Why would anybody eat a puppy?! :(
     
    #69
  10. ghostwriter59

    ghostwriter59 Sex Machine

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2009
    Messages:
    713
    I wish that our congressmen and women would actually think before passing legislation in the house and senate just to force through bad bills. We have been supporting half od the ones who are responsible for our current situation.
    ( Banks, mortgage companies and auto makers.) Their greed brought about all of this. We have now mortgaged our schidlrens and their childrens future. We are completely screwed if China ever calls in the money we owe them or they start selling thier investment in the dollar.

    It will eb a shame to see the late great USA go down in flames with the recent passage of House Resolution 2454, which will tax every company in the US for their expelling of any type of gas into the atmosphere. But we are now in a quandry with a democratic congress and democratic President. They can force through any type of bills they wish since they have the votes in the house and senate.
     
    #70
  11. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    Brilliant. You take everything you site in the first paragraph which took the last eight years under Bush to happen and then turn around and try to blame the democrats for it. Now that's some fancy thinking there I can tell you.
     
    #71
  12. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    Hey prtndr where are you bud? I thought you were in a big itching hurry to call me out on this thread? Where are you at?
     
    #72
  13. spider2009

    spider2009 Newcumer

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Messages:
    7
    very easy attainable Health care for all would be awesome.
     
    #73
  14. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    Has anyone seen prtndr? A discussion on this thread was so important to him he followed me around on two or three other threads issuing challenges and calling me a coward and a bully and then when I respond to him he seems to be everywhere but here.
     
    #74
  15. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    60,533
    Second Amendment: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    Tenth Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

    --------

    I would like for these amendments to be repealed. I would like for an additional amendment to weaken the power of the Supreme Court.
     
    #75
  16. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    60,533
    I would like that, too.
     
    #76
  17. deidre79

    deidre79 Supertzar

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    13,631
    not me! universal health care instituted by Barack and the boys is something i will fight, pathetic paying for others, sorry that is not how this country works.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 4, 2009
    #77
  18. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    Any body seen prtndr? I've got a lot more evidence right on this thread that the right wing noise machine is hurting our nation by putting words in the mouths of idiots.
     
    #78