You should learn how to read fool.....

Oh, I'm sorry, I shouldn't ask you to do things that you aren't capable of.:laughing:

 

I just dont care what happens to the little ginger fuckers .

 

I do not know about Wisconsin, however,

I do not know about Wisconsin, however, I do know that in Washington State, where I am registered to vote "Mickey Mouse" AH, and "Absolutely Nobody" have had their votes count in several elections, while votes of many soldiers based at Fort Lewis (now JBLM) who were registered to vote in the State of Washington, while serving in Iraq, had their votes 'disapear'! The State of Washington has I think passed the City of Chicago (at least for now) in terms of vote fraud.

 

You know what I don't really believe a word of this. Just because a name appears on a voter registration card does not mean anyone voted under that name.

And if you've got military votes that are not being counted that needs to be taken up with the FEC or Defense department.

Because so far despite all the claims of voter fraud no one has really found any yet and it seems to be the Republican activist that are getting caught trying to illegally register to vote.

O'Keefe May Have Committed Voter Fraud

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats...efe-commits-fraud-at-new-hampshire-polls.html

Indiana Secretary Of State Goes On Trial For Voter Fraud

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/20...etary-of-state-goes-on-trial-for-voter-fraud/

 

Almost all such cases follow the same pattern. People who are out registering voters, and who are often paid on a per-registration basis, have a financial incentive to fill out falsified registration cards. Often, the phony registrations are caught by the people supervising them, or by county election officials. But even if they're not, there's almost no chance that an individual listed on the form will actually try to vote, let alone succeed, because that person does not exist, nor does the address or any other information on the form.

The bottom line is, this is a completely bogus issue. There are almost NO documented cases nationwide in which ineligible people have voted in large numbers.

 

It was interesting to watch various news channels on AFN

AFN the Armed Forces Network has on channel dedicated to news. It has an interesting schedule, it runs 1 hour of ABC, 1 Hour of PBS, 1 Hour of Fox, on hour of CNN, 1 hour of MSNBC, etc. on a rotating basis. CNN & Fox as '24 hour news (and opinion shows)' get more coverage than ABC/CBS/NBC. Also shows like Today, Charlie Rose, Bill O'Reilly, and Rachel Madow are on AFN.

Mostly I would watch the news shows, rather than the opinion shows. I do not like everyone on Fox news, but some of my favorites are Brit Hume, Bret Baier, Catherine Herridge, and Stuart Varney. I also respect Juan Williams, Sheppard Smith, Lis Wiehl, Kelly Wright, and, yes, Alan Colmes. I have met, and like Sean Hannity, I respect what he does with his 'Freedom Concerts' and other fund raisers to support wounded veterans and the children of soldiers, sailors, airmen, Mariens, and 'first responders' who have died since 11 September 2001, however, I almost never watch his opinion show. War Stories, hosted by former USMC LTC Oliver North is usually quite good too.

I also get my news from PBS (especially the News Hour, Frontline, and the Washington Week in Review), as well as the CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corp.). I no longer have much respect in 'The Beeb' (BBC) which has really gone to hell over the last 20 years!

In my opinion Fox News was significantly better at covering events in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other world events like the terrorist attack in Mumbai than ABC/CBS/NBC, and still better than CNN, although IMHO CNN has been getting better over the last few years. MSNBC is just full of 'Hot Sick'! For Opinion shows I would rather watch the PBS shows I listed above.

I think it is the Opinion shows that turn so many people off to the Fox News channel. Despite Bill O'Reily being the most popular show on Fox, I find him hard to take, the same with that female lawyer who got popular from the OJ trial. I've watched 'Red Eye' on occasion, and it often makes me laugh. I think I would rather see Sean Hannity paired with Alan Colmes again, than watch either of their shows alone.

For what it is worth, Fox was the news channel that most service members in Iraq and Afghanistan like(d) to watch. But even among those who often watched news on AFN there were those who do not like Fox.

 

Whoa, whoa ................ whoa pardner. I mean great dissertation and all that but what happened to all this personal knowledge, and we would think proof, of all this voter fraud?

Because I look at and regularly check about every news outlet you mentioned but I have not seen any real evidence of any kind of voter fraud.

 

The problem with Fox is that it isn't news. It is political commentary disguised as news.

 

To Stumbler,

I was posting what you are responding to (what I liked about AFN usuing multiple news shows from multiple networks, while you were replying to my first vote about vote fraud/"missing" votes from deployed soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines). As you seem to infer, I am more interested about the issue of vote fraud, than I am about peoples opinions about what news shows/channles they like. I will try to get you information I am willing to share (some information I will not share because it could result in their RL name being linked to this site; and I will not do that without their permission). But I should be able to find, then post on here some open source information, and hopefully links to reports from the US Justice Department, and from the District Attorney's office.

I was talking about those anchors and other personalities on this thread, because the topic of this thread is about Fox News, and people who do not like Fox News. I was posting a divergent opinion, while agreeing that there are valid reasons to not like some of the opinion shows on the Fox News Channel. I do enjoy watching opinion shows, sometimes, and for those who like Rachel Maddow, there are those who would rather watch Bill O'Riley, or Sean Hannity; I do not care for any of those threee in particular, and preffer the Washington Week In Review, the Wall Street Journal Report (weekends on Fox), also news commentary by Neil Cavuto or

Must post now, will try to follow up by the weekend.

 

Fine I've just got a real problem with the voter repression laws being pushed by ALEC and the conservative/Republican/Tea Party which is based on the false notion that voter fraud is rampant when in reality its hardly in existence.

And as far as Fox News I don't see any difference between their "opinion" people and what is supposed to be their actual news. As Jon Stewart points out even Fox's news actually copies the talking points issued by the Republican National Committee nearly word for word.

Also much further would one have to go than the studies that show Fox viewers are actually more misinformed than people who watch no news at all.

 

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Steven Crowder exposes Jon Stewart for the fraud that he doesn't know he is.


I love watching Steven Crowder's videos. His sharp cynical wit is almost on par with mine, lol. Recently Steven exposed Jon Stewart's bias against conservatives. Honestly, I really don't care that Jon Stewart is a lamming progressive dirt bag. To each his own I always say. I just don't like people, when they act fake or pretend to be someone they aren't. Jon is a liberal who tries to pass himself off as a "moderate". Some people aren't that bright and unfortunately fall for his claim. His track record of comments throughout the years have more then discredited his claim. Well Steven Crowder pulled the curtain back on the real Jon Stewart and Jon wasn't pleased. Jon being moderate is as laughable as the "Coffee Party" claiming that they aren't liberal. Here's a quick side note about the "Coffee Party" by the way, the founder of the Coffee Party was a volunteer for Barack Obama. See what I mean about people pretending to be someone they aren't?

[YOUTUBE]HdW4geJ-lik[/YOUTUBE]

Jon has a policy of not having on his show conservatives pundits. It's a no "duh" why he and other liberals who host television shows do that. They know that they can't defend their beliefs and policies against conservatives. Jon Stewart like Bill Maher will have on their shows other liberals who agree with them, have their liberal audiences applaud at every lame joke they make, and it would make them appear to be so sophisticated, when in reality they are really anything but. Can you seriously imagine what would happen if I were a "guest" on Bill Maher or Jon Stewart's show? The producers of those shows would have to cut to commercial within the first three minutes, because I would be gleefully systemically destroying their thin perception of actual intelligence. I have no problem with debating liberals. I guess I'm more accepting of diverse points of views then liberals are. Maybe Jon Stewart should take notes from me. Good work Steven. One last thing about the phoniness which is Jon Stewart. He told the panel on CNN that they are "helping the corporations". Jon Stewart himself is employed by Comedy Central which is owned by the Viacom Corporation.

 

That's interesting. At last count, conservative pundit Bill O'Reilly has made eight (count 'em) appearances on "The Daily Show".

So I think it's safe to assume once again that you and your source are full of it.

 

This is a take down of Fox News, Sean Hannity and the late Andrew Breitbart all in one collapsing house of cards. And this was supposed to Breitbart's big revelation before he died.

Sean Hannity Gets Excited About Two Men Hugging

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsme...ited_about_two_men_hugging.php?ref=fpnewsfeed

 

I sit here and laugh, I just spent 30 minutes watching a very unbiased news bulletin on the BBC.

 

The BBC is also one of my choices but I don't hear them as much as I used to. When I was working nights I'd listen to the BBC from midnight to 06:00 almost every night. And there was always something interesting.

Of course we in the US have a very hard time being able to believe a government sponsored news network could actually report unbiased news.

 

It didn't say he NEVER has had any. The article said "Jon has a policy of not having on his show conservatives pundits".

Now come on, have you ever watched The Jon Stewart show? How often have you seen conservatives on his show?

 

Yeah right! That's why you NEVER use the BBC in any of your quotes....:lol:

 

I've seen plenty of conservatives on the show. But how can you have O'Reilly on the show eight times, or ONE time, if you have a policy of NOT having conservatives on the show?

I'm beginning to think you're not very smart.

http://gawker.com/5333740/why-do-conservatives-love-appearing-on-the-daily-show

 

*laughing* What utter nonsense. And this is the revelation that, according to right-wing conspiracy theorists, got Breitbart killed.

What is WRONG with these people???

 

Here in the UK we have "The Sun" - a daily national "news"paper - From what I have heard of Fox News, they and The Sun probably have a lot in common with regards to how they report.

The Sun is a paper for semi-literates who wouldn't know real news if it took them from behind and pounded their brains out.