For over 60 years men have explored, delved into the vaginal areas of a woman's body, poked and teased to find that special place call the G-Spot.

Today the Journal Of Sexual Health has published an article arguing that the G-Spot does not today, nor ever has, existed.

Its been a hectic debate among medical researchers over the past decades to prove either way that the G-Spot does sit tightly inside a woman's vagina or is simply a myth.

Just a few years ago medical imagery seemed to prove conclusively that it did, and in one survey 82% of women claim they have had a g-spot orgasm (well won't they be disappointed by today's news!).

Yet in reviewing all the evidence Dr Amichai Kilchevsky, from the Yale-New Haven Hospital has concluded that no, the G-Spot is a myth.

Women may orgasm through stimulation of that vaginal region, but she argues, that stimulation maybe felt through the thin walls by the clitoris, and result in an orgasm.

Shall we all stop trying to find it then?

 

I read recently the clit has a large "root" structure and the sensation that many woman associate with the G spot is actually a different and internal part of the clit being stimulated. Sounds reasonable. If correct I don't see much of a fuss, there is something different there that gives a sensational feeling for many woman so I can live with that area still being referred to as the G spot.

 

I always knew the G spot was crap. The real thing is the precious, wonderful, delicate and attention-needing clitoris. "Don't just go diving for the clitoris, man, you gotta kiss the girl first;" said my old gf. But once you kiss the girl's cat around the edges, the clit comes alive and she will cum.

The G spot is not, the Clit is the Spot!

 

There has to be something else in the general direction of the clit where the G-spot is supposed to be. Too many woman claim "g-spot orgasms" for them to be delusional or mistaken.

 

My x definatly had a Gspot, I was never able to get her to orgasm by her clit but I could drive her to oblivion with her G spot

 

The average clitoris is around 3 inches long when the woman is aroused. Most of this is internal and can be located with a finger at the front of her vagina. It is slightly rougher than the surrounding area which is usually wet and liquid during lovemaking.
Once she is aroused, rubbing it gently precipitates a more intense orgasm.

 

hehe...too funny.

The trouble is the researcher is looking at it like some magical second clitoris when it is not. It would be like saying a man's prostate and seminal vesicals are the head of his cock.....Don't get me wrong, one may stimulate the other, yet they are two different things that may affect each other when stimulated.

Frankly, it sounds like the sextard is just bent she can't find it.

Hush.......an alias

 

But think of the fun she had proving or disproving the theory

Isn't it amazing what some people spend time trying to prove exists or not.

Who gives a fuck. All I know is that like others her clitoral stimulation in some form with stimulation of the "g spot", "clit root" or whatever you want to call it makes my girl squirt. Mmmmmmmmm

 

??????

Well there may not be a G spot, but I know that I have two areas on my genetalia that become aroused when having sexual intercourse. Let them to continue to argue about the g-spot, while I continue to enjoy the two most sensative areas of my genetalia.

 

G spot or not.

Keep licking and exploring down there.

 

One Study?

Too many studies are done every year that promote or denounce any one subject, no matter what you call it or who says it doesn't exist? I have used this area known as the g-spot to excite women through vibrating stimulation and my cock to amazing effect. The original studies were verified by gynecological circles so, until more studies are done I will keep using that spot to my advantage!:excited:

 

I don't care what anyone says. I'm going to keep looking for it. :excited:

 

One study says so and so is bad for you, another says its good for you. researchers can make data show what ever they are tring to prove.

 

tosses miners cap w/light off.....WTF.....i just needed another week or two i was making progress but i think her legs/thighs are numb from staying spread/tied up for so long....maybe its a Q spot.....i do like doing the alphabet on a study participant.....
can i get a few more applicants to keep exploring please......Q Q Q Q Q Q slurps Q
still applying for govermental money for my research....

 

Well, I guess more than 30 of the women I've slept with don't exist, either, because they ALL had distinct G-spots.

 

Does it really matter?

I mean, if there's an area of sensitivity that can bring on an orgasm, does it matter whether it's called one thing or another?

Surely the important thing is that there's an area there (along with all the other 'erogenous zones') that a woman can enjoy, and her partner should endeavour to try and please her!

Such a debate should be left to medical people who want to determine why it causes pleasure, whilst the rest of us mere mortals should just take pleasure from it, regardless of its name

 

Perfect

As I was reading down this thread, I was in the processs of concluding the formulation of a brilliant reply to the original post, which I was going to share here . . . and then I read Angel's. Which is, of course, the only proper response. And the best.

 

Damn! All those years of researching "down the tube"!:excited:

 

Aw shucks. :laughing:

 

Here's how you find it:

- Stick a finger or two in the vagina palm side up
- Curl your fingers in a "come here" motion towards her abdomen
- Your fingers should curl around a harder ridge that feels kind of bumpy at the top
- Congratulations. You've just found what is commonly referred to as the g-spot. Give it a good rub and she just might squirt.