Im sorry if this question sounds idiotic, but I'm simply curious. Thanks.

 

Whether a penis is circumcised or not it doesn't lend to it being bigger. Some men have huge members and are uncircumcised, same applies the other way around. Circumcision does not make the penis bigger to answer your question.

 

circumcised penis looks bigger than uncircumcised penis because it not covered with the foreskin.

 

size?

:wall:Size has nothing to do with circumsized or uncircumsized :wall:

 

Better a Round-head than a Cavalier.

Thinskin

 

No, it is not a stupid question. Statistically it has been proved in the case of twin boys of which one was circumcised (for medical reasons) and the other left intact, that circumcision does result in a smaller penis.
This is due to the reduced blood flow to the circumcised penis as a result of cutting away not only one third of the nerve endings (thus reducing feeling and eventually sexual enjoyment) but also blood veins. Reduced blood flow results in stunted growth, therefore a smaller penis. It is estimated that to leave a penis intact will result, on average, a 10% increase in size over a circumcised one.
It can be said that the circumcised boy is the runt of the litter....

 

Pure conjecture, with no scientific evidence, so . . .

 

.
Scientifically proven in various medical studies studying differences between twins.
The truth hurts, doesn't it? It does not help to deny it....
,

 

LMAO. Something you read on the internet, no doubt.

Well, as an experienced medical professional who works with genito urinaty medicine, I can assure you - and more importantly, the other members - that I know for a fact that there is no hard medical evidence to substantiate this. Some doctors claim this, but there are cranks everywhere - as your presence testifies!

I repeat:

 

Any "experienced medical professional who works with genito urinaty medicine" and who is pro the tribal blood ritual known as circumcison, must be a witchdoctor.
.

 

Any man who criticizes another man's cock for no apparent reason can only be seen as insecure with his own equipment. One man's circumsized cock affects you in no way, shape or form. Get over it. Who gives a fuck?

 

Who said that I was pro-circumcision? I am not. If there are medical or religious reasons, then fair enough. I don't believe in circumcision for circumcision's sake.

Oh, I meant to say before. You mentioned studies on twins. I assume you mean so-called "identical twins". Well, that is no indicator, as "identical twins" are never identical. They have different phenotypes. Their nuclear DNA is indeed identical; however, the mitochondrial DNA is different, so basically, you can ignore such "studies". Just go back to your perfect little bubble and cease criticising others - especially when your so-called facts are as ridiculous as your outlook.

 

Just to contribute to the debate. There are advantages to being circumcised, all that time that the naked head rubs against your underwear causes a certain amount of desensitization therefore a circumcised cock is less likely to be a premature ejaculater.

It is also cleaner of course.

Thinskin

 

I think you forgot to qualify your statement with "...than an uncircumcised penis where the owner doesn't retract the foreskin every time he washes."

Not quite the same thing. Circumcised ≠ cleaner.

 

Ironically, intact females are ten times more "unclean" than intact guys, yet nobody seems to insist on circumcising them for the sake of "cleanliness".
It must be remembered that routine circumcision originated in tribal communities and in countries where daily hygiene was (and generally still is) at a low level, water is scarce, and soap an unknown commodity.

 

I knew identical twins in school where one was 6'1" and skinny as a rail and one was 5'6" and decently stocky, at least in comparison to his brother; and by looking at pics on their facebook even now, long after graduation (and long after their bodies should be fully matured) they still have a substantial difference...so your studies are horseshit cuz if identical twins can be totally different body types, they certainly can have different sized cocks, or anything, feet, hands, etc...whether one or both or neither have been circumcised.

 

Are you

Are you cut or uncut?

 

I am uncut

 

Uncut

Interesting

 

I don't know about size but I am anti-circumcision unless medically needed. My husband had a botched circumcision... they took too much skin and it caused the penile skin to tear every time he got an erection. He finally had a surgery back in January to try and restore some of his foreskin. They took skin from his testicles and used it to reconstruct his penis. It hasn't tore since. It's not very pretty but I love it. To me it's beautiful because I can enjoy sex with him now without worrying it's hurting him. He is able to use the bathroom normal. He can do everything he should have been able to this whole time.