1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. anotheruser1

    anotheruser1 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Messages:
    9,942
    OBAMA HAS A CIVIL WAR GOING ON, AND HIS BATTLEFIELD IS INDIVIDUAL STATES; HIS GOAL IS TO TAKE YOUR GOD-GIVEN & CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHTS. HEADS UP TEXAS, IT'S COMING TO YOUR STATE NEXT.

    WAS COLORADO DEFEATED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT?

    Governor Hickenlooper About To Give Secret Service Power To Arrest Colorado Sheriffs

    QUESTION? Do you think Obama cares one bit about federal gun legislation? He appears to know already that he had no chance to win the gun battle in Congress. So while your eyes have been elsewhere, he and Joe Biden go into states and lobby and push their goals onto weak leaders, who are willing to ignore their oath of office and betray the citizens they swore to defend and protect.

    Obama and his goons are going into states (EACH with their OWN Constitution!) and declaring war on their citizens and he and his minions form specific strategy to remove freedom from that state's citizens through legislative fiat.

    In spite of the resistance of its citizens, and the fight back of defiance to enforce these unconstitutional laws by the local sheriffs there in Colorado, Obama has now inserted FEDERAL authority that would be able to ARREST LOCAL SHERIFFS--with the cooperation of the treasonous Governor there...

    It doesn't mean the fight is over, the good people of Colorado and their sheriffs are bravely standing in the face of the feds and we stand with them.

    Colorado appears to be the testing ground for inserting federal authority and usurping the local authority of the sheriff. If he can be successful there, he can take that battle strategy to defeat the constitution into other states, yours might be next.

    Read more about it at GLOBAL INTEL in the link below: Colorado, and apparently Texas (next) are being targeted with an attempt to set up a federal authority framework that will enable Secret Service agents (not just those guarding the president), and others of the U.S. Secret Service including uniformed division officers, physical security technicians and specialists, and other ‘special officers’, to arrest and remove an elected sheriff for refusing to enforce the law (or anyone breaking the law).

    The bills being introduced defines law as including any rule, regulation, executive order, court order, statute or constitutional provision.

    Why are they doing this? Here’s why… It would establish federal authority police powers in a State, enabling an enforcement arm reporting directly to the president (Secret Service).

    It would enable the president /executive branch to theoretically override the actions and preventative measures that are now being taken by many States throughout the country who are trying to preserve 2nd Amendment gun rights and who are prohibiting the enforcement of unconstitutional law passed by Congress or pushed by executive order.

    As some of you may know, a growing list of sheriffs (more than 340 so far) across the country have expressed that they will not enforce a Washington mandate that clearly violates the Second Amendment.

    Many State laws to preserve gun rights are gaining momentum. States include Montana, Ohio, Kentucky, Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, Michigan, Utah, and New Mexico. However, in Colorado, Senate Bill SB-13-013 has evidently just passed, and is now ready to be signed by the governor, giving police powers and arrest authority to the federal/executive branch of government (Secret Service) within the State. In Texas a similar bill has just been introduced in the State legislature.

    The president and vice-president Biden have been actively pursuing state legislatures and pushing for passage of the bills. Obama is scheduled to visit Colorado in just a few days. “Colorado is a pawn for the Obama-Biden plan,” and then on to the next… at least those that won’t fall into line.

    It is a full court press by the federal government to empower themselves even further by inserting themselves as police authority within the state, to eliminate opposition.

    …thought you’d like to know

    http://www.globalg2.com/2013/04/01/federal-framework-being-set-up-to-arrest-sheriffs/

    http://patdollard.com/2013/03/color...enforce-obama-gun-laws-without-sheriffs-help/

    http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/state-grants-secret-service-vast-new-powers/
     
    #1
  2. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    60,503
    DON'T USE ALL CAPS IN YOUR POST
    EVER. ‘Shouting' through the written word is pointless and annoying, clearly.
    http://www.videojug.com/film/how-to-behave-on-an-internet-forum



    "Who you are speaks so loudly I can't hear what you're saying."

    - Ralph Waldo Emerson
     
    #2
  3. anotheruser1

    anotheruser1 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Messages:
    9,942
    Well if it isn't the resident pedophile. Go fuck yourself doggo, when this country is in the trouble its in because of the terrorist turd in the white house it is worth shouting
     
    #3
  4. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    I'm sure happy that I voted for my Governor,,Kasich is kicking ass,,more and more people are pleased with him...


    AND NOT TO BE OUT DONE HERE,,,,,DL,,,,,THIS IS JUST FOR YOU,,,,OBALLAH IS PROBABLY THE BEST,,BEST AT LYING HIS ASS OFF,,OBALLAH IS NOT PROTECTING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND NEEDS TO BROUGHT UP ON TREASON CHARGES,,,YET THE LEFTIST MAJORITY IN THE SENATE WONT HAVE IT............BUT I WILL........
     
    #4
  5. anotheruser1

    anotheruser1 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Messages:
    9,942
    I wish I could say the same, the pile of shit here in georgia will sell us out for a free dinner.
     
    #5
  6. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    60,503
    I am not a pedophile, but you are a stupid, ignorant fool with nothing behind your opinions but anger, hatred, and foolish delusions.
     
    #6
  7. Distant Lover

    Distant Lover Master of Facts

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    60,503
    Blah blah blah. You never bring facts and insights to a discussion here, only hot air.
     
    #7
  8. freespiritx

    freespiritx DreamWeaver

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    5,672
    Well, those sneaky North Koreans are ready to stage an invasion, and everyone might want to consider having more than a slingshot to repel the buggers.

    Tongue in cheek comment? Of course it is.

    But don't you find it funny, that men who are surrounded by people bearing arms to protect them, want restrictions on everyone else from having protection?

    How interesting.
     
    #8
  9. ridgerunner

    ridgerunner gardener of stone

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Messages:
    9,748
    anotheruser there is no way in hell any government official will ever disarm the people of texas
    and heres a tip for ya stop blaming everything on obama he hasnt done anything according to the republicans
    the situation we are in is not the fault of only the current administration it is the fault of the voters and officials and corporations for the last 50years
    in russia they palnted hemp at the scene of the chrynobyl disaster and thusfar the radiation levels are minimal because of it rather than the toxic rate it would be without it
    we have allowed the government to allow companies and churches and banks to dictate what is right for far too long to end it overnight
    im not going to keep people in power that do not represent the people and let corperations act as individuals but then again i dont have secret service protection for life like all republicans must
     
    #9
  10. Heyesey

    Heyesey Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2008
    Messages:
    8,362
    Isn't the second amendment the one that says the country needs a standing militia to defend itself?

    It's two centuries out of date. The US has by far the biggest professional army in the world to defend itself. Why is that thing still on the books?
     
    #10
  11. ridgerunner

    ridgerunner gardener of stone

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Messages:
    9,748
    the 2nd ammendment does not say that a standing malitia is needed to defend the nation
    it does state...... being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
    and at the time that was written there were no organized police or dedicated military persoell in the US
    it is an article that has outlived its intent and common deffinition
     
    #11
  12. anotheruser1

    anotheruser1 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Messages:
    9,942
    It means that the people need a militia to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. It has nothing to do with our governments army
     
    #12
  13. anotheruser1

    anotheruser1 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Messages:
    9,942
    whether its a left or right boot that is on your throat is of no consequence
     
    #13
  14. Heyesey

    Heyesey Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2008
    Messages:
    8,362
    It didn't when it was written. Who invented that line to try and defend it? And who would ever be stupid enough to believe that a lockerbox full of firearms is any sort of defence against the United States army?
     
    #14
  15. anotheruser1

    anotheruser1 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Messages:
    9,942
    That's exactly why it was written, they knew how money and power corrupts people. Any person in the military that turns on a citizen fighting tyranny should be killed first. For the most part they will not do it, even though obama is requiring that military leaders will kill any u.s. citizen for any reason or be fired
     
    #15
  16. RandyKnight

    RandyKnight Have Gun, Will Travel

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,534
    Yep from someone who lives in a country that has decided the Magna Carta is also out dated....
     
    #16
  17. RandyKnight

    RandyKnight Have Gun, Will Travel

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,534
    New Texas Bill to be voted on...


    Any future federal laws passed by Congress or executive orders imposed by President Barack Obama aimed at restricting the ownership of semi-automatic guns or limiting the size of magazines will be considered illegal in Texas — that is, if a newly proposed bill makes it through the Texas legislature.

    GOP Rep. Steve Toth said he plans to introduce the “Firearms Protection Act,” which calls for felony criminal charges to be filed against any federal official who tries to enforce new gun-restricting regulations in the Lone Star State.

    If a federal official comes into the state of Texas to enforce the federal executive order, that person is subject to criminal prosecution,” Toth told 1200 WOAI’s Joe Pags Tuesday.

    Federal officials would face a $50,000 fine and up to five years in prison for attempting to enforce a federal gun ban, according to Toth.

    “It is our responsibility to push back when those laws are infringed by King Obama,” Toth said.
     
    #17
  18. imported__2355

    imported__2355 Ungodly Intelligent And Attractive

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    4,108
    the merest thought of proposing a law that would violate the Second Amendment hasn't even begun to speculate about the possibility of crossing anyone's mind. Least of all Obama's.
    And laws limiting the size of magazines and requiring background checks are all legal and constitutional and make sense considering the players involved lately in mass killings and the circumstances surrounding them.

    What is neither legal nor constitutional is for a public safety officer, sworn to uphold the laws of the State, to decide that he would no longer do so because he disagrees with them. His job is not to pick and choose, but to enforce. He is withing his rights to sue in order to have the laws he disagrees with overturned, and would get my admiration if he did. But his refusal to do the job he accepts a paycheck for gets only my censure and should result in his suspension and the equal suspension of his authority.

    And Toth is a bigger asshole than Louie Gohmert.
     
    #18
  19. Quat

    Quat Porn Surfer

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2009
    Messages:
    10
    amen

    amen
     
    #19
  20. Quat

    Quat Porn Surfer

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2009
    Messages:
    10
    We have nothing to fear from the US Army. They can't even defend our border with Mexico.
     
    #20