1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. M4MPetCock

    M4MPetCock Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    13,642
    trump dwsw.jpg



    Wasserman Schultz Threatened Police Chief For Gathering Evidence On Her IT Staffer’s Alleged Crimes


    5/24/17

    Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz threatened the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police with “consequences” for holding equipment that she says belongs to her in order to build a criminal case against a Pakistani staffer suspected of massive cybersecurity breaches involving funneling sensitive congressional data offsite.

    The Florida lawmaker used her position on the committee that sets the police force’s budget to press its chief to relinquish the piece of evidence Thursday, in what could be considered using her authority to attempt to interfere with a criminal investigation.

    The Capitol Police and outside agencies are pursuing Imran Awan, who has run technology for the Florida lawmaker since 2005 and was banned from the House network in February on suspicion of data breaches and theft.

    “My understanding is the the Capitol Police is not able to confiscate Members’ equipment when the Member is not under investigation,” Wasserman Schultz said in the annual police budget hearing of the House Committee On Appropriations’ Legislative Branch Subcommittee.

    “We can’t return the equipment,” Police Chief Matthew R. Verderosa told the Florida Democrat.

    “I think you’re violating the rules when you conduct your business that way and you should expect that there will be consequences,” Wasserman Schultz said.

    As one of eight members of the Committee on Appropriations’ Legislative Branch subcommittee, Wasserman Schultz is in charge of the budget of the police force that is investigating her staffer and how he managed to extract so much money and information from members.

    In a highly unusual exchange, the Florida lawmaker uses a hearing on the Capitol Police’s annual budget to spend three minutes repeatedly trying to extract a promise from the chief that he will return a piece of evidence being used to build an active case.

    If a Member loses equipment and it is found by your staff and identified as that member’s equipment and the member is not associated with any case, it is supposed to be returned. Yes or no?” she said.

    Police tell her it is important to “an ongoing investigation,” but presses for its return anyway.

    A federal employee with knowledge of the situation and who requested anonymity told The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Investigative Group that as House authorities closed in on Imran Awan and his brothers, a laptop used by Imran was hidden in an unused crevice of the Rayburn House Office Building. Wasserman Schultz’s office is in Longworth House Office Building, a separate structure.

    The laptop was later found by Capitol Police and seized because it was relevant to the criminal investigation, the source said.

    The investigation is examining members’ data leaving the network and how Awan managed to get Members to place three relatives and a friend into largely no-show positions on their payrolls, billing $4 million since 2010.

    The congresswoman characterizes the evidence as “belonging” to her and argues that therefore it cannot be seized unless Capitol Police tell her that she personally, as opposed to her staffer, is a target of the investigation.


    When TheDCNF asked Wasserman Schultz Monday if it could inquire about her strong desire for the laptop, she said “No, you may not.” After TheDCNF asked why she wouldn’t want the Capitol Police to have any evidence they may need to find and punish any hackers of government information, she abruptly turned around in the middle of a stairwell and retreated back to the office from which she had come.

    Her spokesman, David Dameron, then emerged to say “We just don’t have any comment.”

    Though on the surface Wasserman Schultz would have been a victim of Awan’s scam, she has inexplicably protected him, circumventing the network ban by re-titling him as an “adviser” instead of technology administrator.

    Politico described him and his wife, Hina Alvi, as having a “friendly personal relationship” with both Wasserman Schultz and Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York.

    That baffled a Democratic IT staffer, who said “I can’t imagine why she’d be that good of friends with a technology provider.”

    “Usually if someone does bad stuff, an office is going to distance themselves” rather than incur political fallout for a mere staffer, he added.

    Wasserman Schultz resigned as Chairman of the Democratic National Committee in 2016 after Wikileaks published thousands of internal emails obtained by an as-yet unidentified hacker.


    ---------------------

    Whatcha hidin', Fibbuh?
     
    #1
  2. ace's n 8's

    ace's n 8's Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    Messages:
    60,616
    ''Do you know who I am....I'm Debbie Wasserman Shultz''......''You'll do as I say, and like it''....
     
    #2
  3. clarise

    clarise Precious princess Banned!

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    17,788
    Most of the people who voted for Hillary have no idea that she, CNN, and the DNC rigged her campaign. they have no clue, and they don't care. They have one question and one question only: "where's my free shit."
     
    • Like Like x 3
    #3
  4. msman

    msman Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    11,156
    The democratic party is slowly falling apart.
    Now evidence has surfaced that says the NSA under Obama was conduction illegal searches on U.S. citizens since 2011.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #4
  5. Bron Zeage

    Bron Zeage I am a river to my people

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    13,585
    The best defense is a good "They did it too," offense.

    Actually, it's not any kind of defense.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    #5
  6. clarise

    clarise Precious princess Banned!

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    17,788

    In general I tend to agree with this, but it is certainly relevant to bring up Obama in this context. He himself passed on all of this Russian collusion nonsense in the early fall, when everyone thought Hillary was going to win. It was only after she lost that he loaded up on all this conspiracy nonsense, on the way out the door, to deflect from Hillary's many hot potatoes and his own transgressions (not least of which being his fore-knowledge and complicity in the email server mess).

    It's relevant to bring him up, due to all of his own actions, on his way out, not only to provide cover for Hillary and the DNC but also to cover his own ass.

    So, his apologists can whine, "but Obama, but Obama," only to a point. It's not a matter of his critics saying, "but he did it too," back in the day. No. He's right in the middle of this mess, here and now. He's a star player in it, so NO, he does not get a pass.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    #6
  7. Bron Zeage

    Bron Zeage I am a river to my people

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    13,585
    The problem with the "Obama did it, too," defense is that the GOP had majorities in the House and the Senate. Anything Obama or Hilary did too, could be investigated and exposed. It took no political fortitude, because it was a win/win situation for the Republicans. They did their best and came up with nothing.

    Now they are in a Republicans investigating Republicans scenario and their balls have dried up. No one has the stomach for it. They couldn't care less if Trump gives Putin the blueprints to SAC headquarters, if it gives them enough time to cut taxes for the rich.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    1. TwoCards
      Yep, another liar whining about Russia and Trump. Keep on Bron, we have an active patrol on duty to mop up the froth. Republicans did their best you say? Keep telling yourself that. Investigate what now Bron...more Democrat transgressions. Trump is teflon, nothing sticks because all anyone has is an assumption...speculation and lies will sink the left, please continue.
       
      TwoCards, May 26, 2017
    2. Bron Zeage
      Do you think the Republicans did less than their best. Was this some kind of fixed boxing match where they brought Hillary Clinton to testify and then took a dive?

      I say investigate all the allegations against Obama, Hillary, and everything that may or may not have happened during the Obama years. Let's get it all on the record. They never will. No stomach for it, now that the last election is over, and the next one is way too soon.
       
      Bron Zeage, May 27, 2017
    3. TwoCards
      The Republicans did exactly what was needed to win, cast doubt on the previous administration's character. It was easy. They won, now as you all froth and speculate, wasting words and time, Trump carries on his job as the left is dismissed as pathetic. Please carry on, it will ensure your continued losses.
       
      TwoCards, May 27, 2017
    #7
  8. msman

    msman Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    11,156
    It took some time to get all of the paperwork. Just recently they have seen the FISA warrants that started popping up near the end of Obama's term.
    What do people think the republicans are going to do with what they are finding? Look at what has been to Trump and there isn't a bit of evidence.
    They have some of the evidence against Obama and are getting more. I am sure the republicans will be very nice to Obama and the democrats.
     
    1. xxxaddict76
      How more many years of 'getting evidence' on President Obama do you need? Republicans have been in charge of Senate and Congress since 2010. You have the same winning percentage on these investigations as Jesus coming back from the dead again.
       
      xxxaddict76, May 26, 2017
    2. Cy@xnxx
      the percentage of JESUS comeing back from the dead are 0% as he has already done that hes just going to be comein back
       
      Cy@xnxx, May 27, 2017
    #8
  9. xxxaddict76

    xxxaddict76 Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    4,184
    Keep spinning those wheels. So far in 8 years you have no charges or convictions. Another Republican con.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #9
  10. Bron Zeage

    Bron Zeage I am a river to my people

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    13,585
    The GOP is a coalition party, and coalition parties, by definition are impotent.
     
    #10
  11. wantsomefun

    wantsomefun Storyteller and Lover In XNXX Heaven

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2014
    Messages:
    19,062
    [​IMG]

    Which is why I trust used car salesmen and traveling roof repair contractors more than politicians.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    #11
  12. clarise

    clarise Precious princess Banned!

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    17,788

    Love it.

    So... with the first syophant Eric Holder running justice, and then when he resigned, with his own lackey Loretta Lynch minding the store, and in the second term, with Bill Clinton's boy, James Comey, running the FBI... and with the mainstream media dutifully running interference for eight straight years and throwing down the race card whenever an ill word against Obama was so much as whispered.... it's all the GOP's fault that Obama's many scandals never gained traction.

    Okay.....

    Just like Obamacare is the GOP's fault.

    And Obama's 3.5 million deaths in the middle east in eight years... that's the GOP's fault.

    I guess it's the GOP's fault for everything around here.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #12
  13. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,161
    Fox News Retracts Seth Rich Story That Stirred Controversy

     
    #13
  14. Bron Zeage

    Bron Zeage I am a river to my people

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    13,585
    Let's see if I understand you. The GOP has the majority in both Houses and couldn't get traction because people talked mean about them. Sure, why not. Any excuse is as good as another, when you don't want to do something.

    The race card is a funny thing, but it's mostly poor salesmanship. When our neo-cons wailed about Obama's golfing and his vacation days, it was possible to concede they might just be concerned about the welfare of the nation. However, when Trump spent more time on the golf course and less time in the Oval office, than any President in history, and not a peep about it from the right, what could explain this kind of hypocrisy, except the race card?

    Holder is gone, Lynch is gone, Comey is gone, and Obama is gone. Why not go after them now? Must be that vicious mainstream media that's holding them back. Probably scared the New York Times will mention them in an editorial, or something.

    A caucus of eunuchs.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    1. deleted user 777 698
      With Bron I just consider the source. He'll be around to comment, he can't help himself... liberals always have to have the last word. :)
       
      deleted user 777 698, May 26, 2017
    2. Bron Zeage
      Well, Smitty, you got a Majority that shoots blanks. Republican Senators and Congressmen are too scared to stand in front of a crowd of people from their district. They are crippled because the 2018 elections are a locomotive headlamp at the end of the tunnel. In this case, the race card refers to upcoming Congressional races.
       
      Bron Zeage, May 26, 2017
    3. TwoCards
      Trump is rolling along just fine Bronster. The only thing impotent around here is the left. 2018 elections will take even more seats from the froth. Your party is over. Oh well, I'm sure you have some blue pills to help with your "limp", old man.
       
      TwoCards, May 26, 2017
    4. Bron Zeage
      We'll know soon enough. In the meantime, the GOP Congress is concerned with nothing but preserving their majority and doing nothing. Maybe that's a winning strategy. Maybe they'll be able to explain how they did nothing, while a Republican was in the White House on Mondays through Thursdays.
       
      Bron Zeage, May 27, 2017
    5. TwoCards
      And Trump keeps working, congress will step up as needed...in the meantime you all will continue to froth....and be relegated to the hind tit. Suck it up buttercup.
       
      TwoCards, May 27, 2017
    #14
  15. msman

    msman Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    11,156
    Most of the information on Obama's whitehouse is just coming out now.
    When the democrats started demanding every record there is on Trump they didn't know all of the things Obama did without letting them know, especially in his last days.
    You will notice there isn't much said about Comey's memos now that the democrats found out how far back the request for the memos was going.
    2014 is the year I am hearing. There are some who think there are more memos about Obama and Lynch, Clinton, and the DNC.
     
    #15
  16. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,161
    Why do you keep trying to tell this stupid lie. The Democrats are in hotter prusuit than over to not only getting their hands on Comey's memos but also have him testify in open session. Its the Republicans dragging their feet.

    So why do you insist on trying to keep telling this lie?
     
    1. TwoCards
      Comey admitted to another lie today regarding Hillary. Fuck off Stumbles. Comey testimony about anything will either show his incompetence or the Dems corruptness. Please take a seat. And don't question msman, you Stumbles are the biggest phony and liar on this site.
       
      TwoCards, May 27, 2017
    #16
  17. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,161
    Did DNC Staffer Seth Rich Send 'Thousands of E-Mails' to WikiLeaks Before He Was Murdered?
    A man claiming to be a private investigator is making uncorroborated claims about the deceased staffer.

    DNC staffer Seth Rich sent 'thousands of leaked e-mails' to WikiLeaks before he was murdered.

    RATING
    [​IMG] FALSE
    ORIGIN
    On 16 May 2017, Fox News published an explosive report linking the death of murdered Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich to tens of thousands of e-mails allegedly found on his laptop computer. Fox reported that the e-mails were internal Democratic National Committee messages Rich transferred to Gavin McFayden, a now-deceased investigative journalist, who then sent them to the document-dumping web site WikiLeaks.

    The Fox report claimed that there was a conspiracy between the local police department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the D.C. mayor’s office to cover up the investigation:

    An FBI forensic report of Rich’s computer — generated within 96 hours after Rich’s murder — showed he made contact with WikiLeaks through Gavin MacFadyen, a now-deceased American investigative reporter, documentary filmmaker, and director of WikiLeaks who was living in London at the time, the federal source told Fox News.

    “I have seen and read the emails between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks,” the federal investigator told Fox News, confirming the MacFadyen connection. He said the emails are in possession of the FBI, while the stalled case is in the hands of the Washington Police Department.

    The revelation is consistent with the findings of Wheeler, whose private investigation firm was hired by a third party on behalf of Rich’s family to probe the case.

    “My investigation up to this point shows there was some degree of email exchange between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks,” Wheeler said. “I do believe that the answers to who murdered Seth Rich sits on his computer on a shelf at the DC police or FBI headquarters.”

    The federal investigator, who requested anonymity, said 44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments between Democratic National Committee leaders, spanning from January 2015 through late May 2016, were transferred from Rich to MacFadyen before May 21.

    Rich, a 27-year-old DNC staffer, was shot twice in the back at 4:20 in the morning on 10 July 2016 amid the run-up to the presidential election. Although none of his possessions were taken from him, Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police consider it a botched robbery attempt, because there had been a spate of muggings in Rich’s Bloomingdale neighborhood at the time.

    Almost two weeks later, on 22 July 2016, WikiLeaks dumped a load of hacked e-mails that would embarrass the DNC and create a media frenzy in the months before the election. The timing of the incidents, as well as Rich’s employment at the DNC, led to conspiracy theories tying his death to the leak. Adding to the confusion, WikiLeaks offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the conviction of Rich’s killer. Since his death, Rich’s family has consistently denied rumors linking him to WikiLeaks.

    The Fox News story about Rich came one day after a report by the Washington Post accused President Donald Trump of spilling classified information to Russian envoys during their visit to the Oval Office on 10 May 2017. Brad Bauman, a spokesperson for Rich’s family, told us he believed the Fox story was motivated by a desire to deflect attention away from the Post report:

    I think there’s a very special place in hell for people that would use the memory of a murder victim in order to pursue a political agenda.

    The Fox story uses two sources: Rod Wheeler, a Fox News contributor characterized as a private investigator in the article, and an unnamed “federal investigator.” On 15 May 2017, Wheeler speculated to local news outlet Fox5 that there was critical information on a computer that belonged to him, which was either in the possession of the FBI or MPD:

    The police department nor the FBI have been forthcoming. They haven’t been cooperating at all. I believe that the answer to solving his death lies on that computer which I believe is either at the police department or at the FBI. I’ve been told both.

    Wheeler claimed to have a source at the FBI that “confirmed” Rich was linked to WikiLeaks, and a source inside the police department who told him MPD was told to “stand down” from the investigation. In a follow-up interview on Fox News, Wheeler implied that a conspiracy reaching to the highest levels of the city’s government was at work:

    I want to find out who caused that man’s death so we can put them behind bars. But if there’s somebody in politics, if there’s somebody in government, whether it’s the mayor’s office or anywhere else in this city that’s involved, you better believe they’re going to be dragged in and questioned.

    We were able to confirm the FBI is not investigating Rich’s murder — it is an MPD investigation.

    We reached out to Wheeler by e-mail and have yet to receive a response, but since the Fox story was published, he has been quoted in several news articles recanting his original story. He told BuzzFeed News the following day, “That story on Fox 5 last night was inaccurate. I don’t even know where the computers are.”

    On 19 May 2017, the Rich family attorney sent Wheeler a cease and desist letter saying he had violated a contract forbidding him to publicly disclose information about the case and threatening to sue if he continues to do so.

    We contacted the office of Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser to ask if there was a lurid connection between the mayor, the DNC, and Rich’s death, and got a flat denial from spokesman Kevin Harris:

    All claims made by Mr. Wheeler are false and take fake news to a whole new level. The family deserves better and everyday MPD continues to work diligently to solve this case.

    We also asked the police department about Wheeler’s claims that the department was stepping back from the investigation. A spokesperson for the department denied it and said that the investigation remains active:

    The assertions put forward by Mr. Wheeler are unfounded. The Metropolitan Police Department’s (MPD) Homicide Branch is actively investigating Mr. Rich’s murder and we continue to work with the family to bring closure to this case as we do with all homicide investigations. If there are any individuals who feel they have information, we urge them to call us at 202-727-9099 or text us at 50411. The department is offering a reward of up to $25,000 for information on this case that leads to the arrest and conviction of the person or persons responsible.

    Bauman said in a statement that Wheeler was not authorized to speak on behalf of the family, and added the family only learned of the new round of accusations through news reports:

    Even if tomorrow, an e-mail was found, it is not a high enough bar of evidence to prove any interactions, as e-mails can be altered and we’ve seen that those interested in pushing conspiracies will stop at nothing to do so. We are a family who is committed to facts, not fake evidence that surfaces every few months to fill the void and distract law enforcement and the general public from finding Seth’s murderers. The services of the private investigator who spoke to press was offered to the Rich family and paid for by a third party, and contractually was barred from speaking to press or anyone outside of law enforcement or the family, unless explicitly authorized by the family.

    McFayden, an investigative journalist who was an early defender of WikiLeaks, died in October 2016 after a battle with lung cancer.

    Although the Fox report claims Wheeler is a private investigator, a search for Wheeler’s name on the public lookup tool for licenses in Washington D.C. yields no results. We also checked for a license under his name in Maryland, where his firm Capitol Investigations is based. This search also yielded no results. When we asked MPD whether he was indeed a homicide detective with the department, they only confirmed he once worked there starting in 1990. He was dismissed by the department in 1995, but a spokesman did not explain why.

    We sent an e-mail to Wheeler through his firm and have not yet received a response.

    NBC News identified the “third party” who hired Wheeler to investigate Rich’s murder as Ed Butowsky, a Dallas-based financial adviser, who is also a Fox News contributor.

    http://www.snopes.com/seth-rich-dnc-wikileaks-murder/
     
    #17
  18. TwoCards

    TwoCards Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2014
    Messages:
    2,572
    "man claiming to be a private investigator is making uncorroborated claims"...yep, typical Stumbles...

    I told you pathetic one, don't post it here, post it on your bathroom wall for more impact...Putz.
    [​IMG]
     
    #18
  19. clarise

    clarise Precious princess Banned!

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    17,788

    Snopes!

    ROFL

    I KNEW IT. And I called it. 100 posts ago or more, in a scuffle with your pal AnonyPlume, I called it when I said that you and the rest of the snowflakes would deny the existence of the Rich/MacFayden story until Snopes gave you your pablum talking points and authorized you to respond.

    And so you have.

    Snopes told you what to think. AS PREDICTED.

    Go back to Rawstory, Stumbler. Much more reputable.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    Last edited: May 27, 2017
    #19
  20. Deleted User kekw

    Deleted User kekw Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    8,657
    I find it hilarious how the right plays up the "cities are warzones" narrative, but somehow a robbery turned murder in DC is unfathomable

    Talk about desperate
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #20