1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,161
    1. StanleyOG
      What do you mean?
       
      StanleyOG, Aug 11, 2019
    2. stumbler
      Sorry to bother you. It just looks like a bot top me.
       
      stumbler, Aug 11, 2019
  2. slutwolf

    slutwolf Porn Star

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,960
    Geez , bring in the popcorn ,

    there's some funny shit in here

    (I think Stanley was overwhelmed long ago ,
    judging by GD in recent weeks .
    It just a free for all)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • wtf wtf x 1
  3. gammaXray

    gammaXray Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    2,815
    GLLDbwa.png
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,161
    The US can learn a few things from New Zealand.

    10,000 Banned Guns Bought During First Month of New Zealand Buyback Plan

     
    • Like Like x 1
    1. View previous comments...
    2. slutwolf
      You might be in for a bit of a shock.
      There's plenty of guns left for protection against idiots and nasties.

      My mate still has a cabinet full , and his weapon of choice is a 308 , so you won't be safe untill you're a long way away ,
      and he dosen't need a second shot.
       
      slutwolf, Aug 15, 2019
    3. slutwolf
      IDIOT.
      What the fuck are you on about ?

      Who ever said no guns allowed .
      Certainly not me.

      As for my friend , he's a gun collector , and a military trained marksman , ex Viet vet.
      He dosen't "need" or claim to "need" his guns , and I haven't heard a single complaint about handing in his ak 47.
      In fact when they first became available , he was like most of us , wondering ,
      WTF ,
      why are they allowing these things in.

      He has a farm , often invaded by wild pigs and foreign pest birds , so he dose have a very legitimate need of several guns , but that's entirely nothing to do with your
      completely Stupid comment .

      Also hunts deer , another import pest .

      I suggest you engage brain before spouting ignorant rubbish.
       
      slutwolf, Aug 16, 2019
      submissively speaking likes this.
    4. slutwolf
      Fuck off
      Don't even try to speak for me ,
      or try to attribute your bullshit nonsense to me.

      You can't even comprehend my reply.
      What a joke.
       
      slutwolf, Aug 16, 2019
  5. pussy in boots

    pussy in boots ride em cowgirl up

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    57,039
    Not sure if this goes here.
    Philadelphia! City of love?
    Six police officers shot. One in the head.
    Not much information yet.
     
    1. Sanity_is_Relative
      You need better sources for your news because once again you shit the bed with false news.
       
      Sanity_is_Relative, Aug 15, 2019
      stumbler likes this.
    2. pussy in boots
      What false news.
      Get out of your mamma's basement. Get a life and Join the real world.
       
      pussy in boots, Aug 15, 2019
      theperverted1 likes this.
  6. slutwolf

    slutwolf Porn Star

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,960
    I missed the news , but found this.
    35 min ago
    CNN)Police have been in an hourslong standoff with at least one barricaded suspect who they say shot six officers on Wednesday in a North Philadelphia neighborhood.
    * *
    No serious wounds to officers

    The wounded officers' injuries were non-life threatening.
    One had a graze wound to the head.
    All of the wounded have been released from the hospital, Gripp said.
    * *

    They're in negotiations.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    1. Ed Itor
      So this is a Union standoff?
       
      Ed Itor, Aug 15, 2019
  7. Gerbowski

    Gerbowski Newcumer

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2019
    Messages:
    5
    Lots of shootings
     
  8. thestrangerinyou

    thestrangerinyou cookiemonster

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2009
    Messages:
    6,737
    Shootings are a American pass time you know like football its as traditional as American pie and corrupt politicians.
     
    1. View previous comments...
    2. thestrangerinyou
      The first mass civilian shooting was in scottland in 1996. But hey we perfected it just like football and apple pie.
       
      thestrangerinyou, Aug 15, 2019
      theperverted1 likes this.
    3. Pulsar66
      Utter bollocks. Michael Ryan, Hungerford, 1987. 16 killed, not including himself.

      The first US mass shooting was the St Valentines Day Massacre in 1929.
       
      Pulsar66, Aug 15, 2019
    4. Sanity_is_Relative
      Part of the issue behind the chaos around "mass shootings" is the very definition of the term itself. Who decides what makes it a mass shooting? Is it more than 1 person murdered or more than three not to include the gunman?
       
      Sanity_is_Relative, Aug 16, 2019
    5. Pulsar66
      I think technically it's four people (not including etc).
       
      Pulsar66, Aug 16, 2019
    6. Sanity_is_Relative
      The number depends on the agency involved, that is why we need a global standard.
       
      Sanity_is_Relative, Aug 17, 2019
  9. slutwolf

    slutwolf Porn Star

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    Messages:
    19,960
    Well that's interesting.
    I guess things like the Hungerfoord and Queen Street masacres , and our Aramoana shootings never happened.

    tell that to the families of the more than 30 people who were murdered on those days.

    Of course no point in mentioning the 23 who were murdered a Lubys in Texass ,
    or 21 at San Ysidro in San Diego
    or the Hoddle Street masacre
    and no point in listing any more ,
    since they musta neva bin did

    like Stockton schoolyard
     
    • Like Like x 1
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2019
    1. Ed Itor
      Gee, does it bother your sensibility so much that people were killed elsewhere that you have to prove we kill bigger & better?
      Maybe your mate shouldn't give you a head start so that you can be part of the statistics rather than boast about them.
       
      Ed Itor, Aug 15, 2019
    2. slutwolf
      What on earth got your
      knickers in a twist ?

      Are you another butt hurt boy taking something out of context.
      See comment above


      I have not tried to prove anything.

      Just pointed out , in case you're to ignorant to know ,
      that there were mass shootings around the world before 1996
      Including here in NZ
      And in Australia
      and in Scotland
      and in Canada
      SO

      WTF
      :)
       
      slutwolf, Aug 15, 2019
      stumbler likes this.
    3. Pulsar66
      Yes those are definitely atrocities but they aren't mass civilian-on-civilian killings.

      They're performed by government sponsored forces on the civilian population.
       
      Pulsar66, Aug 16, 2019
  10. cirdellin

    cirdellin Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    11,205
  11. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    104,161
    One of the things that came out of the Philadelphia mass shooting is a spokesman for the Police Department saying they are fucking sick and tired of having to go up against people with assault weapons and thousands of rounds of ammunition. And yes the shooter got the guns illegally. But as the police point out that is because the NRA and gun makers have put millions of them on the street. And if Congress is owned by the NRA at least get the fuck out of the way and let local jurisdictions start dealing with the problem by banning assault weapons and getting them off the streets.

    Also you guys believe Fox News don't you?


    Shock Fox News Poll: 56 Percent of Americans Blame Trump Rhetoric for Mass Shootings

    *One of the problems anytime there is a discussion of gun controls is since only about 30% of households have a gun in them there is an incredible amount of gun ignorance. Semi-automatic guns include some of the most popular hunting and self protection guns in the country including even .22's. So a ban on all semi automatics is ridiculous. And the public needs to be educated on the difference between them and assault weapons.

    https://www.mediaite.com/news/shock...cans-blame-trump-rhetoric-for-mass-shootings/