1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. ArchAngel

    ArchAngel Sex Machine

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    688
    #1
  2. ArchAngel

    ArchAngel Sex Machine

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    688
    More!

    Here's an article from canada.com. This is a continuation of the video:

    Groups slams decision to relocate Christmas tree

    TORONTO -- Ontario's premier and several religious groups Thursday slammed a provincial judge's decision to banish the Christmas tree standing in a Toronto courthouse lobby because it might offend non-Christians.

    "It's so stupid. I'm at a loss for words," said Muslim Canadian Congress founder Tarek Fatah. "The judge should take a trip to the rest of the world. Christmas is celebrated by Muslims in many countries -- they should ban political correctness, not Christmas trees.

    "If people are offended (by a Christmas tree), I'm glad they're offended. I think it indicates a serious mental disorder when people want to bring down other people's happiness."

    The group issued a press release calling on Muslims to "celebrate Christmas with their Christian cousins and light up Christmas trees to send a message to the Ontario judge that she is wrong on all counts."

    "Hindus would be highly upset if another group infringed on our right to put up Hindu symbols in public," said Hindu Conference of Canada spokesman Ron Banerjee. "I think it's important that political correctness not be taken too far so that we're being crazy about it."

    Premier Dalton McGuinty called the move a "misunderstanding" of what the province's multicultural makeup is all about.

    "We enjoy the wonderful privilege of building a pluralistic, multicultural society," he told reporters, noting that Queen's Park, where there are Christmas trees aplenty this time of year, also celebrates Jewish, Muslim, Hindu and other traditions.

    "We're not asking any one of the wonderful communities that make up our province to somehow abandon their traditions. What we're saying is let's share in those opportunities, let's better understand those celebrations.

    The backlash comes after Justice Marion Cohen ordered a Christmas tree at the Ontario Court of Justice be relocated to a back hallway behind frosted glass doors -- Enear the family court desk where the door is adorned with a Santa Claus poster.

    Cohen defended the relocation in a letter to staff this week, which acknowledged people are "upset" with the decision.

    "I am aware the Christmas tree has been placed in the front lobby at Christmas time for many years," the letter said. "I do not think it appropriate that when the clients of our court enter our courthouse, the first thing they see is a Christian symbol.

    "The message to the many non Christians, who attend our court and are confronted with this symbol, is that they are not part of this institution. It does not belong to them. They are different."

    It is unclear if the move was sparked by complaints from court visitors. Cohen declined to take media questions Thursday.

    Ministry of the Attorney General spokesman Brendan Crawley said each provincial court has one judge who makes decisions about administrative issues involving the courthouse.

    For instance, no religious symbols are allowed in the Superior Court of Justice's lobby, but the nearby Old City Hall court has a Christmas tree prominently displayed.

    "There's no overall court or ministry policy that addresses this situation -- each courthouse has a certain amount of latitude when it comes to these things," Crawley said.

    Employees confirmed that removing the tree -- which has stood in the hallways during the holidays for at least a decade -- didn't sit well with most staff members.

    "I think that's the consensus of everyone," said one employee. "That's what brought this issue out in the public."

    "It's part of a multicultural society's growing pains. But if people make mutual adjustments and respect each other, things ought to work out," said Canadian Jewish Congress executive vice-president Manuel Prutschi.
     
    #2
  3. Bukkake Bunny

    Bukkake Bunny Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2006
    Messages:
    6,475
    This kind of thing always irritates me. Trying to please other denominations and cultures is one thing, but pandering to every little whim somebody might have against some stupid thing is quite another. Christmas and Christmas Trees have gained the status of simply being tradition in a cultural sense, not just tradition in a religious sense. Just because the idea of Christmas is based on Judeo-Christian mythology doesn't mean Christmas in itself has to be a religious holiday. My family and I celebrate Christmas in the most secular way possible. We don't have nativity scenes, crosses, etc. Just a tree, Santa Claus, snowmen, etc., not to mention prodigious gift-giving.

    Christians, I think, have pretty much lost hold of Christmas as "their" holiday. They can have Easter for that. Christmas is for everyone now - which means there's no reason to remove secular Christmastime imagery such as trees and wreaths.

    Political Correctness taken to this extreme always seems counter-productive.
     
    #3