Yes i know I'm sure it has been brought up before, but I couldn't find the thread.

Anyway me and my gf were just having this discussion and i asked her if she's ever been with a guy who had a uncircumcised dick before and she said yea 2. I myself am circumsized but anyway i was just wondering do ladies prefer it one way or the other or does it not really matter? my gf said she doesn't care but i think uncircumcised penis are gross haha thats just my personal opinion though. what do ythe ladies think? also guys is your's circumsicised or uncircumcised and do you like it like that or wish you parents would have made the other decision when you were born?

 

I'd say use the search function, but that's old news... personally I prefer uncircumcised.

 

At age13 I had two mates and one was intact and I always remember when he pulled his foreskin back it was gross. There was a sort of horrible stuff in there,as far as I'm concerned I'm glad to be circumcised.

 

This

 

82% of the world's males are intact, and that says something....
The title of your posting should rather have been "Mutilated or unmutilated".
I am NOT "uncircumcised", just as I am not undead. I am intact, natural, unmutilated.
As for preferences? I quote:
"The 1999 British Journal of Urology featured a study of American women who have experienced sex with both intact and circumcised partners. "The results of the survey are truly astonishing. Among other things, the vast majority of women indicated that they overwhelmingly prefer intercourse with a man with a natural penis (approximately 90%). More astonishing is the fact that many women actually rated circumcised intercourse a negative experience when compared to natural intercourse."
Read an extract of the research results here.
Circumcision is a barbaric practice which originated in countries where a daily bath and soap was unknown.

 

I prefer the look of a circumcised cock.

 

i am un-circumsized, but dont have huge amounts of fore-skin that cover my penis when erect. so most ppl think i have been cut. cut is cleaner and easier to keep clean.

 

I abhor the fact that mine was mutilated without my consent.

 

I think people that use the word mutilated as reference to circumcision take themselves way to fucking seriously and are looking for some way to make themselves into a victim.

Get the fuck over yourselves. People get really mutilated every day in violent acts across the world. Having a tiny piece of skin removed as a baby does not equate.

 

Unmutilated is not a word, so apart from your flawed argument, you're backing it up with flawed words.

What's wrong with not being natural? You're suggesting piercings are unnatural, tattoos are unnatural and induced birth! This is the 21st century, and I believe that people have the freedom to do as they wish - be it natural or not.

And, any way: who defines natural? Surely it can't be natural for women to get operations and the such to help childbirth - women should just have babies out of consideration for medicine or anything, because that's natural - that causes illnesses and death.
Circumcision, believe it or not, is mostly to do with health as opposed to aesthetics. You may argue that it is scientifically proven that circumcision does not reduce cancer or something - but it is easier to clean and does not host too much bacteria. Religions, too, you could argue that are not to do with health - that, I'm not sure about. But, by all means - not everyone thinks of aesthetics and naturalness.

At the end of the day, a penis is a penis - it serves its functions. People have preferences of that I'm sure: I'm circumcised, but I prefer foreskin on men; although, that is not to say that I would never go out with men that are circumcised. That would be ignorance.

I fear that you may be a person who ostracises people because they're not natural - if so, is gay being unnatural? I'm gay, I'm sorry to tell you. Or, is having piercings unnatural? The majority of women would love to castrate you at such revelation. Or, perhaps, make-up is unnatural - you might as well drown yourself in the River Styx.

 

I'm circumcised myself, bit I gift agree with beninabox on that one about calling it "mutilated".. that just makes it sound like they just looped the extra skin off with a butcher knife or something..

 

My bad on the spelling, I'm doin this off my phone so my predictive text goes a lil haywire sometimes..

 

HMMMM

i started a post like this. And what the fuck is all this about unclean. If you dont wash something, yes it will become unclean, same as almost anything in life. the smeg/knobcheese ur prolly talking about is a natural cleaner ur body creates to fight off infection. BOOOM

Bow to my smelly cock knowledge.

 

Whatever!

Whatever CUT is BEST!

 

Are you saying circumcision is not mutilation? LOL.

 

What's done was done. I have no choice and can't put it back even if I wanted to. So why complain? It still works fine.

 

agreed 100%


my life would not be any different if i was uncut. and frankly, i like the fact that i am. i think a cut cock looks better and is easier to keep clean.
i am not mutilated. i find it hard to call it "mutilation" since i happen to like it so much. ill call it "improvement"

...at least for me.
keep your opinion to yourself if you dont like what i do like. im not a horrible person for it.

 

Whoever thinks uncut cock is unclean must be showering once a month. I wash my dick daily, inside and out, and it is as clean as it gets.

Might have been a good idea in the 15th century when people were washing once a month, but today is retarded to think there is any difference in cleanliness. It is primarily though a religious idea. There is no Medical purpose for it. None.
Uncut cock is more sensitive and get more pleasure. It does not rub against fabric constantly to lose sensitivity (according to studies, have not tried myself I only have one cock and is not mutilated )

 

Because mutilating someone without their consent is criminal.

That depends on what "fine" means.

 

so you're saying the cut guys have INHERENTLY more stamina?

or what you said above about sensitivity is bullshit

i'm cut and fine with it. most women don't seem to care either way..or they prefer what they're familiar with..which explains your poll results because circumcision is less prominent worldwide

but in the US, among my age group, most guys are cut, most girls are used to cut dick..some to the point that they may "prefer" it. Never heard a girl look at cut cock and say "oh thats gross." i'm sorry that i can't say the same for un-cut cock. unfair but true