Why is the U.S. supplying me to all of the other countries? I think.

 

I didn't say that, snowpea. You did.

I said that they do not have an official position on Global Warming.

If I'm wrong, find it and post it.

 

Thank you for not sharing me then. I'm flattered and was worried what the other countries might do with me. And please don't use me for negotiations either unless it's absolutely necessary. I think.

 

Food for thought

 

Oh what does it mean then ?

 

And while Trump made the US a global laughingstock over this stupid publicity stunt it also appears to have blown up in his face here in the US as well. His approval rating appeared to be improving slightly after his overseas trip. But now they are tanking again to record lows after pulling out of the Paris Agreement.

Which was a really dumb move on his part with some polls showing as high as 7 in 10 Americans in favor of the agreement.

 

You are doing a commendable job at ignoring me here stumbles, but I know that it's tearing you up inside, because you just wish you could tell me to fuck myself, or 100 other things that youv'e come so so close to saying to or about me. But I admit freely and willingly that I will give credit where credit is due, but it's hard isn't it ? I think.

 

That certainly is too bad.

Pulling out of this spreading the wealth concept was one of Trumps campaign promises.

WE THANK YOU PRESIDENT TRUMP.

 

How could anyone ignore Mayling? Are all the Mormon women as pretty as you? If so, could you hook a brother up?

 

So let me see if I understand this correctly. According to EPA Administrator, Scott Pruitt, the Paris agreement would have given 2.5 trillion dollars to India, who wouldn't have to do anything until they got paid. It would have given China until 2030, before it had to do anything about its environmental impact and would have cost the U.S. up to 400,000 jobs. And because President Trump thought that former President Obama had completed fucked us over, he pulled out of this agreement. Everyone is pissed at Trump for pulling out, but no one cares that it was Obama who got us into this mess to begin with?

I don't know wtf the left wingers have been smoking, but maybe you should pass it around. That must be some pretty good shit to make you think Obama did the right thing.

 

actually, it's stupid. doing this means the death of our world's economy and death of our world.

 

A report released earlier this month by the Consumer Energy Alliance (CEA) compiled and calculated the subsidies (incentives, tax credits, rebates, and sellable certificates) for the production of solar energy through the end of 2015 – specifically the rapidly growing rooftop solar market.

The findings are staggering. CEA analyzed the subsidies for 15 states representing a wide variety of policies and geography. Of those, eight of the states were found to deliver aggregate incentives (when combined with a 30 percent federal tax credit) that exceed the total cost of installing a photovoltaic solar facility.

One of those was my home state of North Carolina. CEA’s study found the accumulation of government subsidies amounted to 119 percent of the cost for solar unit owners. In other words, the compensation from various tax credits, rebates, etc., is a 19 percent profit for those who have installed panels on their properties. Much of this subsidy is “earned” before the units generate even a single kilowatt of power!

The absurdity is even greater in some other states, when combined with the 30 percent federal tax credit. Subsidies in Nevada, Louisiana, Arizona, and Connecticut also add up to more than the costs of solar installations in those states. In Massachusetts and New Jersey, the subsidies exceed 180 percent of solar facility costs – and in California, it’s 208 percent!

It’s no wonder, then, that the six top states for solar capacity installed are also represented on CEA’s highest subsidy list. California is number one, followed in order by Arizona, North Carolina, New Jersey, Nevada and Massachusetts, according to the Solar Energy Industries Association.

Some argue that the “quality” of the electricity generated by these solar facilities is superior to the power generated by coal, natural gas and nuclear, and therefore justifies the amount of subsidies they receive, because it is allegedly cleaner.

Unfortunately that is a myth, because when the weather is cloudy (or nocturnal!), the sun is obscured and is a nonexistent energy source. When that happens, coal and natural gas generators must work harder to make up for the ups and downs forced on the grid from solar, therefore polluting more. And that doesn’t even consider the need to dispose of toxic, chemical-ridden solar panels when they reach the end of their (limited) useful lives.

 

It is possible to look at a map of the U.S. and see where solar collectors will actually supply a home with electricity during the daylight hours.
You will notice in much of the U.S. solar panels will not even supply the one home with energy.
In a few areas solar panels will supply the electrical needs of one home during the daylight hours when it isn't overcast.
In even fewer areas you will see there may be an excess of power produced by solar panels during the day.
During the night any excess that would have been generated during the day will be used during the night.

 

It's not all about solar power. Solar power is ONE part of a huge amount of other green power generators (water, wind, biomass, heat pumps, even tidal powers, etc.)

 

We already have water. It is one of the power generating systems that the green people are trying to stop. Water generation is very important but it is becoming very hard to get the required permits.
Wind is another of the power generators than green people are coming out against. That and the very few places wind power can be used. Most areas with sufficient wind is not located near populated areas and will need additional transmission lines run. That drops many areas out of consideration.
Biomass and heat pumps are not even worth discussing. The cost would make it a complete waste of time. Tidal power may have some future but the small amount of power it would produce would also make it a money pit.

The world population is growing. Soon it will become harder to provide even the basic electrical needs of the people.

 

U.S. number one in the world in wind energy production
Wind supplied Iowa with over 31 percent of its electricity last year

 

Solar and wind are not dependable. Coal, natural gas, and nuclear power are. And whether you like it or not, I'm not into giving billions away to put our own economy into the shitter. I'm more into pitting that money back into our economy.

 

2.9 trillion to be exact.