1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. HisBabyGirl

    HisBabyGirl Always & Forever His

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    7,646
    Stephen K. Bannon, the embattled chief strategist who helped President Trump win the 2016 election but clashed for months with other senior West Wing advisers, is leaving his post, a White House spokeswoman announced Friday.

    “White House Chief of Staff John Kelly and Steve Bannon have mutually agreed today would be Steve’s last day,” the White House press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, said in a statement. “We are grateful for his service and wish him the best.”

    Earlier on Friday, the president had told senior aides that he had decided to remove Mr. Bannon, according to two administration officials briefed on the discussion. But a person close to Mr. Bannon insisted that the parting of ways was his idea, and that he had submitted his resignation to the president on Aug. 7, to be announced at the start of this week. But the move was delayed after the violence in Charlottesville, Va.

    The loss of Mr. Bannon, the right-wing nationalist who helped propel some of Mr. Trump’s campaign promises into policy reality, raises the potential for the president to face criticism from the conservative news media base that supported him over the past year.

    On Tuesday at Trump Tower in New York, Mr. Trump refused to guarantee Mr. Bannon’s job security but defended him as “not a racist” and “a friend.”

    “We’ll see what happens with Mr. Bannon,” Mr. Trump said.

    Mr. Bannon’s dismissal followed an Aug. 16 interview he initiated with a writer with whom he had never spoken, with the progressive publication The American Prospect. In it, Mr. Bannon mockingly played down the American military threat to North Korea as nonsensical: “Until somebody solves the part of the equation that shows me that 10 million people in Seoul don’t die in the first 30 minutes from conventional weapons, I don’t know what you’re talking about, there’s no military solution here, they got us.”

    He also bad-mouthed his colleagues in the Trump administration, vowed to oust a diplomat at the State Department and mocked officials as “wetting themselves” over the consequences of radically changing trade policy.

    Of the far right, he said, “These guys are a collection of clowns,” and he called it a “fringe element” of “losers.”

    “We gotta help crush it,” he said in the interview, which people close to Mr. Bannon said he believed was off the record.

    Privately, several White House officials said that Mr. Bannon appeared to be provoking Mr. Trump and that they did not see how the president could keep him on after the interview was published.

    Mr. Bannon had made clear to allies after the American Prospect interview that he expected to be back soon at the right-wing website Breitbart.com that he had steered before joining Mr. Trump’s campaign. He had dinner in New York City on Wednesday night with Robert Mercer, the hedge fund billionaire who is also Mr. Bannon’s chief patron, to discuss the future, according to a person briefed on the discussions.

    Mr. Bannon’s departure was long rumored in Washington. Mr. Kelly, a retired Marine Corps general who was brought on as chief of staff for his ability to organize a chaotic staff, was said to have grown weary of the chief strategist’s long-running feud with Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster, the national security adviser.

    One White House official, who would not be named discussing the president’s thinking, said Mr. Trump has wanted to remove Mr. Bannon since he ousted Reince Priebus as his chief of staff three weeks ago; Mr. Bannon had been aligned with Mr. Priebus. But Mr. Trump changed his mind as several defenders of Mr. Bannon warned the president that he risked losing supporters who saw Mr. Bannon as a conduit of their views.

    Since then, Mr. Kelly has been evaluating Mr. Bannon’s status, according to the official. The president and Mr. Kelly have talked over the past several days and Mr. Bannon had planned to put his resignation in motion in the coming days, this person said.

    Mr. Bannon has been in a battle with Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser, since the spring.

    Mr. Bannon, whose campaign against “globalists” was a hallmark of his tenure steering Breitbart, and Mr. Kushner had been allies throughout the transition process and through the beginning of the administration.

    But their alliance ruptured as Mr. Trump elevated the roles of Gary D. Cohn, his top economic policy adviser and a former official at Goldman Sachs, and Dina Powell, a former Bush administration official who also worked on Wall Street. Mr. Cohn is a registered Democrat, and both he and Ms. Powell have been denounced by conservative media outlets as being antithetical to Mr. Trump’s populist message.

    By MAGGIE HABERMAN, the New York Times, 3 hrs ago

    Mr. Bannon’s many critics bore down after the violence in Charlottesville. Outraged over Mr. Trump’s insistence that “both sides” were to blame for the violence that erupted at a white nationalist rally, leaving one woman dead, human rights activists demanded that the president fire so-called nationalists working in the West Wing. That group of hard-right populists in the White House is led by Mr. Bannon.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    1. freespiritx
      Long overdue.
       
      freespiritx, Aug 18, 2017
      Gcccc likes this.
    #1
  2. John227

    John227 Porn Star

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2014
    Messages:
    1,966
    And if you blink too many times you might miss the next shoe to drop ... Donald Trump RESIGNS!!!!!!

    Tony Schwartz, the 'ghost writer' of "The Art of the Deal", believes and predicts that Trump will resign before 2018 and claim a victory of some sort.
     
    #2
  3. RandyKnight

    RandyKnight Have Gun, Will Travel

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,534
    I did not vote for Bannon---

    he has done all he can do on the inside---he will go medieval on the Trump haters from the outside....
     
    1. anon_de_plume
      Yawn...
       
      anon_de_plume, Aug 18, 2017
      Fig Bucking Dick likes this.
    #3
  4. freespiritx

    freespiritx DreamWeaver

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    5,672
    With the current atmosphere, along with many Republican politicians distancing themselves from Trump, the likelihood is that Trump won't make it to 2018
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #4
  5. Jdbfromnj

    Jdbfromnj Porn Star

    Joined:
    May 10, 2017
    Messages:
    4,414
    This was a welcome exit. It was overdue.
     
    #5
  6. NoOneFamous

    NoOneFamous Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2012
    Messages:
    3,095
    about time they got rid of some of the poor white trash
     
    1. Trev1
      I don't think he is that poor, but he is white trash.
       
      Trev1, Aug 19, 2017
    #6
  7. justpassingthru

    justpassingthru No Rest For The Wicked Banned!

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,439
    The White House released a team photo of the Trump cabinet today ...

    upload_2017-8-18_16-42-41.jpeg
     
    • Like Like x 2
    #7
  8. justpassingthru

    justpassingthru No Rest For The Wicked Banned!

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,439
    It was nearly unanimously applauded by most groups including some republicans and was done at the urging of John Kelly who is slowly taking the reins on cabinet personnel.

    It will be a tall order even for such a capable man as Kelly to mute the Donald though so let's see if he can do it before Trump punts him too ...

    Don't misunderstand things though, Bannon is back at Breitbart and will still be Trumps mouthpiece in his fight with Congress and the Senate.
     
    #8
  9. justpassingthru

    justpassingthru No Rest For The Wicked Banned!

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,439
    Steve Bannon tried to destroy “globalism.” It destroyed him instead.
    Steve Bannon’s hatred for “globalists” has done him in.

    The controversial senior strategist was pushed out of the White House late on Friday, according to multiple reports, chiefly due to his constant feuding with his rivals inside the administration — people like National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster and National Economic Council Chair Gary Cohn.

    Bannon opposed them for essentially ideological reasons: He saw them as being soft on China, on Islam, and on immigration. He waged war against these so-called “globalists” in the press, developing a reputation for frequently leaking damaging stories to conservative media outlets — and was eventually pushed out when the president grew tired of Bannon getting so much attention and Chief of Staff John Kelly grew tired of the infighting.

    That Bannon’s attempt to take power eventually led to his downfall is a funny irony. But it also means that Bannon’s crusade against globalism is on the verge of total failure.

    Bannon fought so hard, by his own account, because he wanted to reshape the world, starting with the United States. This is a tremendously tough task: When you try to “drain the swamp,” the swamp creatures are going to fight back. He positioned himself against the ideas that had dominated official Washington, and indeed much of the world, for decades — and didn’t even come close to changing that consensus.

    Trump does not have the discipline and policy knowledge to make this kind of radical change alone; he needed a figure like Bannon at his side. Now that Bannon is gone, the idea that Trump was going to radically reshape American foreign policy — what he promised during the campaign — looks vanishingly unlikely.

    In short? If there’s no Steve Bannon, there’s no Trump Doctrine.

    Bannon had a radical vision for the world
    Bannon’s project centered on opposition to what he derisively called “globalism”: the idea of tearing down borders and linking countries through trade, immigration, and international institutions like NATO and the United Nations. He believed that Brexit and Trump’s rise in particular showed the way for a global uprising of so-called “nationalists” or “populists” against the status quo.

    “We believe — strongly — that there is a global tea party movement,” Bannon said in a 2014 speech. “The central thing that binds that all together is a center-right populist movement of really the middle class, the working men and women in the world who are just tired of being dictated to by what we call the party of Davos.”

    Bannon sees this movement’s central demand, sovereignty, in a disturbingly ethnonationalist way. He warned of an “invasion” of Europe by Muslims; he emphasized the need for countries that have a “Judeo-Christian” heritage to band together to fight radical Islam. The scale of the threat, Bannon has suggested, is akin to what the West faced in the 1930s.

    “This is when Europe’s looking down the barrel of fascism — the rise of Mussolini in Italy, Stalin and the Russians and the communist Bolsheviks in the Soviet Union. And obviously Hitler and the Nazis,” he said in a 2016 radio show. “I mean you’re looking at fascism, you’re looking at communism. And to say that — what so blows me away is the timing of it. You could look in 1938 and say, ‘Look, it’s pretty dark here in Europe right now, but there’s something actually much darker. And that is Islam.’ ”

    China, in Bannon’s eyes, was also a fundamental threat. He has predicted an outright war between the United States and China — two nuclear-armed powers — in under 10 years. In a recent interview with the American Prospect’s Robert Kuttner, one of the attention-hogging stunts that allegedly contributed to his departure, Bannon described the world as a zero-sum competition between the United States and China.

    “We’re at economic war with China ... the economic war with China is everything,” he said. “One of us is going to be a hegemon in 25 or 30 years and it’s gonna be them if we go down this path.”

    This apocalyptic vision of global conflict really did drive Bannon’s behavior in Washington. His view of Muslim immigration as an “invasion” manifested in the Muslim ban, the initial draft of which was written entirely by Bannon and White House aide Stephen Miller. His fear of China, he told Kuttner, led him to push for harsh restrictions on trade with that country. It also was the motivation behind much of the infighting that got him fired, as he wanted to replace career officials who wanted to work with China with those who shared his aggressive worldview.

    “I’m changing out people at East Asian Defense; I’m getting hawks in. I’m getting Susan Thornton [acting head of East Asian and Pacific Affairs] out at State,” Bannon said in the Prospect interview. “That’s a fight I fight every day here.”

    Bannon’s ideas aligned with Trump’s

    This dark vision — of a Judeo-Christian, Western alliance squaring off against China and the Islamic world — gave an ordering principle to the president’s own impulses.

    Trump shares Bannon’s support for European right-wing nationalism, his fear of Islam, and his instinctive hostility to China. But it’s clear, at this point, that the president does not have a way to translate those ideals into policies. Trump is neither an ideologist nor a policy wonk; his feelings about the world have little in the way of connective tissue or workable implications. It’s up to others to turn these impulses into an agenda.

    Bannon had ideas for doing that. They were radical, and he worked — as he said — “every day” to try to implement them. But he didn’t have much of a support network.

    Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the highest-level official who shared parts of Bannon’s worldview, doesn’t play a major role defining Trump’s foreign policy — and is busy trying to save his own job. Steven Miller has seemed to play a limited role in foreign policy decisions aside from the Muslim ban. Other than that, there’s no one at the top like Bannon.

    Now look at who’s on the other side — the people who want to channel Trump away from Bannon’s vision and toward a more typical approach to foreign policy.

    Kelly, McMaster, and Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis are well-known for taking basically conventional stances on the big foreign policy issues. As a group, they’re strongly in favor of maintaining traditional American alliances, generally hostile to Vladimir Putin’s Russia, and skeptical of blaming Islam as a religion for jihadist terrorism. Gary Cohn, the NEC director, has been the biggest opponent of Bannon’s proposals for cracking down on trade with China. Jared Kushner, Trump’s influential son-in-law, seems to have views similar to this group — as does Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, though he’s been largely ineffectual in internal White House debates.

    The “globalists,” as Bannon would call them, dominate the White House — the aides on Bannon’s side aren’t even close to their level of influence. The president has no demonstrated interest or capability to radically revise foreign policy on his own. His most controversial pronouncements, as my colleague Ezra Klein details, are actually being ignored by the foreign policy apparatus:

    White House staff, congressional Republicans, military leaders, and executive branch officials are increasingly confident simply ignoring President Trump. After Trump tweeted that he wanted the military to ban transgender service members from serving, for instance, the Pentagon quickly said that it had not received an official order and was going to carry on with business as usual until it did. Similarly, after Trump tweeted his threats at North Korea, the key organs of American foreign policymaking — the State Department, the Defense Department, and so on — were quick to declare that nothing had changed, there was no military buildup or new red lines, and everyone should just ignore the commander in chief’s morning outburst.

    Absent Bannon, there’s no one to give unifying voice to a distinctively Trumpian foreign policy, no one who could really take the president’s impulses and shape them into a truly radical doctrine. Without him, in short, the Trumpiest elements of the Trump administration is rudderless on foreign affairs.

    Rudderless does not mean impotent, to be clear. The president still has the ability to make spur-of-the-moment decisions — like failing to commit to defending NATO allies in a speech or threatening to attack North Korea in a press conference — that destabilize global politics. That’s really scary, and I don’t mean to downplay it.

    But off-the-cuff Trump pronouncements are not the same as radically transforming America’s approach to the world — forming an alliance with Russia to fight Islamism, for example, or taking an extremely hawkish line on China both militarily and economically. Those things take time, patience, and, above all, someone at the helm willing to fight for them.

    It’s hard to say how Trump can be that guy without Bannon by his side.
     
    #9
  10. RandyKnight

    RandyKnight Have Gun, Will Travel

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,534
    In an interview with Bloomberg, Bannon said he was "going to war" for Trump...

    If there’s any confusion out there, let me clear it up.

    I’m leaving the White House and going to war for Trump against his opponents...
    on Capitol Hill, in the media, and in corporate America,


    Bannon scoffed at The Democrats...

    “...the longer they talk about identity politics, I got ’em. I want them to talk about racism every day. If the left is focused on race and identity, and we go with economic nationalism, we can crush the Democrats.

    * * *

    Kurt Bardella, a Republican communications specialist who worked for Bannon at Breitbart but later denounced him, predicts the strategist would "feel liberated" by his departure.

    "Now, he will be able to operate openly and freely to inflict as much damage as he possibly can on the ‘globalists’ that remain in the Trump Administration."

    [​IMG]

    It is interesting to note now that Fox News is flailing, probably because it caters so much to the ridiculous MSM narratives, their viewers either turn it off or are going someplace else for their news - and Breitbart has not fully grown up yet.

    Trump's election was due to a lot of lucky circumstances, that might not occur again in 2020 if things are not organized. So this could be Bannon's mission? He has seen Washington from the inside now and can probably be more effective on the outside, than holed up in an office writing policy pieces and advising Trump?

    He is a student of history. Political history and the history of applied psychology.

    He's also a FORMER Goldman Sachs insider. He knows the dark underbellies of the entire planet.

    His dearest desire is to undo the bureaucratic state, the "Deep State".
    Period.

    He knows The Art of War.
    If he has left the WH, it's because he knows he can do more damage to the swamp from outside, especially given what he knows from the inside now.

    Bannon always said he'd be there no more than 1 year.
    So, he learned faster than he expected.
    ====================================================

    So we shall see what happens----
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2017
    #10
  11. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    81,246
    We should get Bannon and Soros to do a grudge match.
    Now that, Shooter would pay to see.
    Wait.
    It appears he'll get to watch it for free.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #11
  12. RandyKnight

    RandyKnight Have Gun, Will Travel

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,534
    IT BEGINS: Bannon Plotting Fox News Competitor As Curious Details Of Roger Ailes’ Involvement Emerge

    Joshua Caplan Aug 19th, 2017 11:42 am 149 Comments

    Former Chief White House Strategist and current executive chairman of Breitbart News, Steve Bannon, is wasting no time in expanding the leading populist news network. Bannon is reportedly plotting a television channel to rival Fox News. Strikingly, the idea was first proposed by former Fox News CEO, the late Roger Ailes.


    Axios’ Jonathan Swan hears Bannon has told friends he sees a massive opening to the right of Fox News, raising the possibility that he’s going to start a network.

    • Bannon’s friends are speculating about whether it will be a standalone TV network, or online streaming only.

    • Before his death in May, Roger Ailes had sent word to Bannon that he wanted to start a channel together. Bannon loved the idea: He believes Fox is heading in a squishy, globalist direction as the Murdoch sons assume more power.

    • Now he has the means, motive and opportunity: His chief financial backer, Long Island hedge fund billionaire Bob Mercer, is ready to invest big in what’s coming next, including a huge overseas expansion of Breitbart News.
    Axios has more:

    Before Roger Ailes’ death on May 18, he expressed a final wish to some of his few remaining confidants: to get back in the game, with a conservative network that would position itself to the right of Fox News, as his baby became more moderate under the next generation of Murdoch leadership.

    In his final days, Ailes sent a message to Steve Bannon in the White House that he’d love to team up on a new conservative media powerhouse.

    • What we hear: Bannon, who otherwise would have been intrigued by the notion, had no desire to leave the White House. So Ailes’ last big idea remained just that.
    Steve Bannon returned ‘home’ to Breitbart News as Executive Chairman Friday afternoon shortly after it was announced that he departed from the White House as Chief Strategist to President Trump.

    Steve Bannon returned to Breitbart on Friday and chaired the company’s evening editorial meeting.
     
    #12
  13. justpassingthru

    justpassingthru No Rest For The Wicked Banned!

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2011
    Messages:
    34,439
    Steve Bannon to target Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner as he pledges to 'go nuclear' on 'West Wing Democrats'

    Steve Bannon, the ousted White House chief strategist, is reportedly considering starting a television network which would allow him to "go nuclear" as he settles vendettas with moderate advisers in the White House and pressures President Donald Trump to pursue a populist agenda of economic nationalism.

    Allies of Mr Bannon compared him to a "tiger freed from his cage," suggesting things would get "ugly" as he targets the Republican establishment and what he calls "West Wing Democrats".

    The departure of Mr Bannon came amid one of Mr Trump's worst weeks as president.

    He and first lady Melania Trump decided not to participate in the annual Kennedy Center Honours event celebrating American culture after a backlash from those being honoured. The White House said the first couple were pulling out to "allow the honourees to celebrate without any political distraction".

    I want to thank Steve Bannon for his service. He came to the campaign during my run against Crooked Hillary Clinton - it was great! Thanks S

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 19, 2017
    Meanwhile, a host of charities canceled annual fundraising events at Mr Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. They included the American Red Cross, Salvation Army, and the American Cancer Society.

    Mr Bannon's possible TV network would be intended as a rival to Fox News, the Rupert Murdoch-owned channel which has been supportive of Mr Trump, but which Mr Bannon now regards as too moderate, Axios reported.


    Immediately after his departure on Friday he re-assumed control of Breitbart, the influential right-wing news website he steered before joining Mr Trump's campaign last year. Mr Bannon said he was "going to war for Trump," which appeared to mean the original hard line policies pursued during the campaign.

    Mr Bannon's new venture would probably be funded by Bob Mercer, the hedge fund billionaire and conservative mega-donor, who has previously backed both Breitbart and Mr Trump. Mr Mercer and Mr Bannon met last week to discus plans for after his White House exit. The following evening Mr Mercer had dinner with the president.

    Trump's former chief strategist Steve Bannon - in 90 seconds 01:33

    On the outside Mr Bannon will target a ring of presidential advisers sometimes known as the "globalists". It includes Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump, chief economic adviser Gary Cohn, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, and National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, with whom Mr Bannon appeared to have lost a battle over putting more troops in Afghanistan.

    Also in the firing line are Republican leaders in Congress such as House Speaker Paul Ryan and senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Republicans who Mr Bannon blames for stalling Mr Trump's agenda, including funding for the border wall, and failing to overturn Obamacare.


    Mr Bannon has few allies left within the White House promoting his agenda of economic nationalism. There was speculation that the few who remain, including senior policy adviser Stephen Miller, and deputy assistant Sebastian Gorka, could be purged by John Kelly, the new chief of staff who is seeking to bring order to the chaotic administration.

    Mr Kelly's authority over the White House was boosted by Mr Bannon's departure. A triumvirate of military generals - Mr Kelly, Mr McMaster, and Defence Secretary James Mattis - now hold extraordinary sway within the administration.

    Sam Nunberg, a former Trump campaign adviser and friend of Mr Bannon, said: "It's a tough pill to swallow because you have a Republican West Wing that's filled with generals and Democrats. It would feel like the twilight zone."

    In a candid first interview after leaving, Mr Bannon told the Weekly Standard: "The Trump presidency that we fought for, and won, is over. The Republican establishment has no interest in Trump’s success. They’re not populists, they’re not nationalists, they had no interest in his programme. Zero. They’re going to try to moderate him."

    Mr Bannon added: "I feel jacked up. I've got my hands back on my weapons. It's Bannon the Barbarian. I am definitely going to crush the opposition. I built a f****** machine at Breitbart. We're about to rev that machine up.” A friend of Mr Bannon told The Atlantic: "Steve is now unchained. He’s going nuclear. You have no idea. This is gonna be really f****** bad."

    Trump says 'both sides' to blame in Charlottesville 01:19

    Mr Bannon's removal was hastened by his growing public profile as a leader of the populist right, which had begun to irk Mr Trump. That included Mr Bannon being on the cover of Time magazine. Mr Trump was also reportedly angered by a book called Devil's Bargain portraying Mr Bannon as the architect of his election win.


    Josh Green, the book's author, spoke to Mr Bannon immediately after he left the White House, and said he was full of "manic" energy.

    Mr Green said: "Bannon sounded like he'd just consumed 40 Red Bulls. He's a tiger being let out of his cage. I think he'll still have Trump's ear. Bannon's great disappointment is that the White House hasn't been able to deliver on a lot of things they promised. In his view that is because people in the White House are inhibiting Trump. He wants to exert pressure from the outside and steer Trump back to the polices he ran on."

    But Steve King, a conservative Republican congressman from Iowa, said: "I don’t have any longer the expectations that Trump can keep the rest of his promises."

    Mr Trump waited a day before thanking Mr Bannon on Twitter. He wrote: "I want to thank Steve Bannon for his service. He came to the campaign during my run against Crooked Hillary Clinton - it was great! Thanks S."

    The danger for Mr Trump now is that Mr Bannon could ultimately turn on him.

    Joel Pollak, Breitbart's senior-editor-at-large, wrote: "It may turn out to be the beginning of the end for the Trump administration, the moment Donald Trump became Arnold Schwarzenegger,” referring to the former California governor's "re-invention as a liberal".
     
    #13
  14. RandyKnight

    RandyKnight Have Gun, Will Travel

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,534
    Rumor has it.....

    Jared Kushner next to go
    It was Roger Stone who said he was going to be phased out on an absence of leave that would be permanent.

    As evidence he cited the fact Ivanka and Mr. Ivanka had been visiting private schools in NYC.
     
    #14
  15. TheDumald

    TheDumald Amateur Banned!

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2017
    Messages:
    99
    No more late night rendezvous' in the Rose Garden oh well!
    I am almost finished making a mockery of the Whitehouse and am slowly coming to realize that I actually won this thing.
     
    #15
  16. RandyKnight

    RandyKnight Have Gun, Will Travel

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    26,534
    Democrats warn Bannon against publishing classified information


    WASHINGTON


    Democrats have a warning for Donald Trump’s former chief strategist Steve Bannon: Don’t use your position at Breitbart to share classified and sensitive information you collected while at the White House.

    "Steve Bannon has an ongoing obligation to safeguard our nation’s secrets, and he does not gain some kind of extra Constitutional protection just because he is now returning to a position in the media,” said Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., the senior Democrat on the House Oversight Committee.

    Cummings said lawmakers closely watch people in such positions after they leave high level security positions. He said Bannon should not guide Breitbart to publish information based on classified material he learned while working for the president.

    ====================================================

    can anyone explain this SUDDEN CONCERN over secrecy? ...

    no problem with commey, mueller, etc. ... WHY NOW? ...


    Democrats are scared!

    Bannon, Awan Bros...it's all coming down for them and they know it....

    I remember Bannon mentioning something like
    "knowing what I know now" in a recent interview
     
    #16
  17. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    81,246
    POPCORN!!
    GITCHER POPCORN!!
    PEANUTS!!
    GITCHER PEANUTS!!

    Let the shit show begin ........................... or continue .............
     
    #17
  18. M4MPetCock

    M4MPetCock Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    13,642

    Running scared...clamming up. Such a beautiful sight to behold.


    Dem Rep Dodges Questions On Arrested House IT Staffer


    8/22/17

    New York Democratic Rep. Yvette Clarke refused to answer questions Tuesday about former IT staffer Iran Awan, who was charged by federal authorities last week for bank fraud.

    Awan, who was arrested last month as he tried to board a plane to Pakistan from Washington, wired nearly $300k to the country before his planned departure. His wife Hina was also indicted but managed to escape authorities months ago after fleeing to Pakistan herself.

    Clarke fired Awan and his brothers, who worked as Capitol Hill IT staffers with him, months before law enforcement announced last February that they were investigating the men for robbery and breaching of security IT protocol.

    The Daily Caller News Foundation’s Luke Rosiak reported Sunday that Clarke agreed last year to sign away $120,000 of missing computer equipment for the two former IT aides who authorities now believe stole the gear from Congress. According to the DCNF, the missing equipment from Clarke’s office included iPhones and iPads.

    Charges against Imran force him to remain in the United States, while investigators continue to look into other aspects of the case. His wife, however, could become a fugitive if she does not return to the U.S. and misses her arraignment.

    -------------------------
     
    #18