Actually I wouldn't be so cruel to these scumbags who sold the USA out for power and wealth as to separate their heads from their bodies. It might prove to be harmful to their health.

I'm a fair man.

I'll settle for just confiscating all of their wealth that they obtained by screwing the USA over and giving it back to the People, placing on them a lifetime ban for lobbying or serving in any political office, and giving them a 20 year prison term.

 

Giving wealth back to the people sounds just a tad Marxist!!

Thinskin

 

Oh.

Well...

In this one lone special circumstance I'll allow it.

 

Suppose you guys have one reason less to hate Russia. Though haters gonna hate any way.

 

FEC Complaint Filed Against Clinton Campaign, DNC For Hiding Russian Dossier Payment
October 25, 2017

An FEC complaint was filed Wednesday against the Clinton campaign and the DNC for violating campaign finance law because they failed to disclose payments for the Russian Dossier.


Today, Campaign Legal Center (CLC) filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) alleging the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign committee violated campaign finance law. They failed to accurately disclose the purpose and recipient of payments for the dossier of research alleging connections between then-candidate Donald Trump and Russia, effectively hiding these payments from public scrutiny, contrary to the requirements of federal law.

Adav Noti, senior director, trial litigation and strategy at CLC, who previously served as the FEC’s Associate General Counsel for Policy said:

“By filing misleading reports, the DNC and Clinton campaign undermined the vital public information role of campaign disclosures. Voters need campaign disclosure laws to be enforced so they can hold candidates accountable for how they raise and spend money. The FEC must investigate this apparent violation and take appropriate action.”

Brendan Fischer, director, federal and FEC reform at CLC said:

Questions about who paid for this dossier are the subject of intense public interest, and this is precisely the information that FEC reports are supposed to provide. Payments by a campaign or party committee to an opposition research firm are legal, as long as those payments are accurately disclosed. But describing payments for opposition research as ‘legal services’ is entirely misleading and subverts the reporting requirements.”

 

What is the appropriate action the FEC might take?

 

Oh no you don't RK!!

Thus far your entire support of the Chump has been based upon substance and not procedure and I have respected that.........I do not agree with that but I respected it. You support him for what he is going to do not how he is going to do it!!

Now you are reversing that emphasis to bash the cunt!!.........That's spineless!!!!

If we are going to examine the how question then we must ask about paying of criminal lawyers fees, loans, tax returns etc. etc.

Don't be spineless and leave this one alone until the dossier that the republicans commissioned has been validated!!

Thinskin

 

Still unable to explain your obsession of posting political bullshit on an anonymous porn forum...

 

Have you explained YOUR obsession of posting political bullshit on an anonymous porn forum?

 

I was not banned and then forced to create another account in order to get my fix... So, M4M, how's it working out for you?

 

You will have to give Brazile for trying. Even going as far as giving Hillary the debate questions in advance.
She gave it her best and lost her job in the process.

 

By the way, it's Hillary's birthday today.

 

Well, but it was you who expressed such shock and outrage that Trump Jr. was apparently willing to accept information embarrassing to Clinton from the RUSSIANS, and you who made much of the SERIOUS FEDERAL CAMPAIGN LAW violation that the meeting itself represented.
Remember?
The part about information that might have been provided by RUSSIAN NATIONALS to the Trump campaign representing a campaign contribution, and that was ILLEGAL??

Is Steele an American, or a foreign national?
Did the DNC pay for the dossier?
Is that a campaign law violation?

Remember that Shooter has been saying for months that the unsupporters needed to be careful what they wished for as the Trump/Russian investigation developed, and the unsupporters were hooting and frothing at every new rumor, innuendo, and whisper that was coming out of the investigation cause, you know, Trump was just days away from impeachment?

Remember?

 

Umm, nothing was hidden, it has been public knowledge since January that both Democrats and Republicans paid Steele.

The dossier was compiled by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele, and contains numerous serious allegations of Russia’s influence over Trump — including the now-notorious “pee tape” story alleging that Trump hired Russian prostitutes to urinate on a bed once slept in by President Barack Obama while Trump watched. That incident was allegedly recorded by the Russians to use as blackmail material. The dossier was originally commissioned by a Republican opponent of Trump in early 2016.


The fact that both Republicans and Democrats had contributed to funding Steele’s intelligence-gathering operation was reported as early as January, almost immediately after the dossier became public knowledge.

https://www.inquisitr.com/4579783/d...b&tse_id=INF_9e0b3d90ba7b11e78240a3a6bbddd67d

 

Seem to be some people on here that know all about the dossier.
Should be someone who knows who the republican was.
Anyone know or would like to make a guess?

 

Actually, Fusion GPS didni't hire Steele till after Democrats took over the smear campaign dastardly dossier deed.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/24/us/politics/clinton-dnc-russia-dossier.html

A spokesperson for a law firm said on Tuesday that it had hired Washington-based researchers last year to gather damaging information about Mr. Trump on numerous subjects — including possible ties to Russia — on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the D.N.C.

The revelation, which emerged from a letter filed in court on Tuesday, is likely to fuel new partisan attacks over federal and congressional investigations into Russia’s attempts to disrupt last year’s election and whether any of Mr. Trump’s associates assisted in the effort.

The president and his allies have argued for months that the investigations are politically motivated. They have challenged the information contained in the dossier, which was compiled by a former British spy who had been contracted by the Washington research firm Fusion GPS.

The letter that was filed in court said that Fusion GPS began working for the law firm, Perkins Coie, in April 2016. Written by the firm’s managing partner Matthew J. Gehringer, the letter said that Fusion GPS had already been conducting the research “for one or more other clients during the Republican primary contest.”

Perkins Coie was paid $12.4 million to represent the Clinton campaign and the D.N.C. during the 2016 campaign, according to filings. The role of the Clinton campaign and the national party in funding the research for the dossier was first reported on Tuesday by The Washington Post.

At the time that Democrats began paying for the research, Mr. Trump was in the process of clinching the Republican presidential nomination, and Ms. Clinton’s allies were scrambling to figure out how to run against a candidate who had already weathered attacks from Republican rivals about his shifting policy positions, his character and his business record.

Fusion GPS hired Christopher Steele, a respected former British spy with extensive experience in Russia, to conduct research into any possible connections between Mr. Trump, his businesses, campaign team and Russia.

Mr. Steele produced a series of memos that alleged a broad conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government to influence the 2016 election on behalf of Mr. Trump. The memos also contained unsubstantiated accounts of encounters between Mr. Trump and Russian prostitutes, and real estate deals that were intended as bribes.

-------------

 

Dossier Vidanya