For more than a year, Democrats and their pals in the abusively biased press have been breathlessly talking about Russia-Trump collusion as if it were the worst scandal in American history.



After a year, the best they can do is somberly insist there is smoke, but no fire. The truth is, there is no smoke.




Not that there wasn’t Russian collusion with a 2016 presidential candidate. It’s just that her name was not Trump. We now have real evidence that the FBI uncovered a Russian plot dating back to 2009 that involved bribery, extortion, blackmail, money laundering and racketeering. It all came a year before Hillary Clinton and the Obama Administration approved the corrupt Uranium One deal.

An FBI informant in this case who infiltrated this Putin network right here in America is offering evidence. He has emails, personal recordings and documents. He has insider knowledge that America's national security was compromised at the highest level. Our country was sold out, right in front of our faces. Clinton and Obama let it happen.

 

Now that all the world has what is an American way of making news, fals accusation, tomahawk strike. What comes after ? but who cares. its all over already.You ppl are cheated and manipulated. Some day you may start a war with us makin another fals news that we attac a moon

 

Uh Oh.
Wait for it..............

 

We aren't really worried about Russia. Russia will die on its own. No reason for the U.S. to do anything other than set back and watch.

 

According tot the Clinton campaign, "we just paid the money to the lawyer. The lawyer paid Fusion GPS. Fusion GPS hired Steele." Trey Gowdy: "Not that easy..."

 

In the famous words of Jackie Gleason, "How Sweet It Is!"

 

How Hillary and the Democrats Played the Russia Card


10/29/17

In 1939, Winston Churchill famously described Russia as “a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma,” which is proving an apt description of the scandal playing out nearly eight decades later about Russian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential elections.

As it turns out, our very own Democratic Party was doing some meddling of its own—using some of the Russians’ own tactics—while using Russians as a foil. That’s the latest twist in a plot line that makes a John le Carré novel look like a kids’ coloring book.

The story started, as you recall, in late July of 2016, during the Republican nominating convention in Cleveland, when the international whistleblowing outfit WikiLeaks published thousands of purloined emails from the Democratic National Committee. Their content was somewhat embarrassing to the Democratic establishment, inasmuch as it bolstered the suspicions of the Bernie Sanders faithful, who believed that under party Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz the DNC had engaged in various subterfuges to help Hillary Clinton quell the Sanders insurrection.

These efforts included dispatching moles to his campaign events and paying Hillary supporters to troll Bernie on social media. Although Wasserman Schultz was forced out, the DNC hierarchy and the Clinton campaign needed to respond. They could have simply told the truth and apologized, the truth being that of course party regulars favored Clinton over Sanders: Bernie hadn’t even called himself a Democrat until he began running for the party’s nomination while Hillary Clinton was Mrs. Democrat. That admission could have been accompanied by expression of regret for their excesses.

But repentance is not in the Clintons’ playbook. In this case, neither was candor. Instead, the campaign’s top officials formulated their lines of attack. First, they cast aspersions on the veracity of the WikiLeaks emails. Second, they insisted this was all a Russian plot to help Donald Trump. It was a calculated one-two punch. By calling into question the authenticity of the emails, Clinton didn’t have to respond to their contents – the sabotaging of Sanders’ campaign. In boxing vernacular, that was the left jab setting up the right cross, which was the Russia angle. The jab was a lie: They knew the emails were accurate. Playing the Russia card was, at best, disingenuous. Thanks to the Washington Post, we now know that the Clinton organization had been plotting a preemptive strike against Trump for months when it hired an anti-Republican opposition research outfit called Fusion GPS to go to Russia and dig up dirt on him.

What emerged from those efforts was the salacious anti-Trump “dossier” produced by ex-British spy Christopher Steele and shopped around to liberal media outlets until BuzzFeed, an online site so hostile to Donald Trump that it refused to accept Republican ads in 2016, took the bait. Virtually everything Clinton and her surrogates have said about Russia and Trump from that day to this has been either a direct falsehood, or a lie of omission. Following up on a tip that Clinton and the DNC were paying Fusion GPS, New York Times reporters were told “vigorously” by Marc Elias, counsel to both the DNC and the Clinton campaign, that there was nothing to it. Yet, according to the Post expose, there was a lot to it—Elias was the one who hired Fusion GPS.

Elias, now representing former Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta, also reportedly sat mute beside his client while Podesta told a Senate committee that he didn’t know who financed Steele’s efforts. Then there’s Clinton herself. She’s played up the Steele dossier while on book tour for “What Happened,” her post-election finger-pointing. In the book itself, she wrote:

“In the summer of 2016, according to The Washington Post, the FBI…began investigating a dossier prepared by a well-respected former British spy that contained explosive and salacious allegations about compromising information the Russians had on Trump. The intelligence community took the dossier seriously enough that it briefed both President Obama and President-elect Trump on its contents before the inauguration.”

Here's what’s missing from that account: Clinton’s campaign paid this “well-respected former British spy,” setting in the motion the entire affair. Let’s stop and consider what that means for a moment. Nobody has revealed how much money was involved—but Elias’ law firm was paid $12.4 million by the DNC and the campaign during the election. How much of that went to Steele? How much did Steele pay his former Russian contacts to spin their spicy tale of Trump cavorting with Russian prostitutes, masking real estate deals as bribes, and generally setting himself up to be blackmailed?

I don’t want to cast aspersions on Christopher Steele, whom many besides Hillary describe as “respected,” but there’s something about spreading so much cash around as part of an investigation that makes the information suspect. It’s why “checkbook journalism” is rarely considered investigative reporting at all: The money creates an incentive to make things up. Viewed through this prism, it all looks less like a genuine investigation and more like a sting operation orchestrated by the Democrats to win an election.

To this day, the only regret expressed by Clinton or her supporters is that they couldn’t place the Steele dossier in the media before the election, though it wasn’t for lack of trying. Even without it, nearly every prominent Democrat, including Clinton and President Obama, warned of Russian meddling during the last two weeks of the campaign. In the end, it wasn’t enough, so after the election, Team Clinton decided to keep using the Russian angle, both to excuse their failure and undermine the candidate who actually won.

Less than 24 hours after Hillary’s concession speech, Podesta and Campaign Manager Robby Mook convened a staff meeting at Clinton’s Brooklyn headquarters to formalize this attack. The effort was described by authors Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes in a book that explains “what happened” more insightfully than Mrs. Clinton’s memoir.

“For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public,” they wrote. “Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.”

 

Shooter does the happy dance!
Someone besides Shooter and Mueller are finally connecting the dots!

 

If it wasn't for XNXX's rules regarding scat pics, for which many have been punished in the past for pics so simple as a cartoon, I'd show the unedited pic. But for now, you can guess what's going on, can't ya?

 

I just laugh my ass off at people who try to discredit the Steele dossier over the report of the pissing prostitutes. No one has ever tried to claim everything in the dossier is true. And in fact I have always speculated the pissing prostitutes is actually a false flag that Putin deliberately planted so he could track the people who were Steele's sources. Which would certainly explain why there is a trail of dead Russians.

But the point is not what isn't true and proven in the dossier but how many things in it have been proven.

And just a few days ago when Carter Page was testifying in a congressional hearing he confirmed a couple more. The dossier says members of the Trump campaign were meeting with top Russian government officials. And Page admitted he did meet with top Russian government officials. And more specifically the dossier says that members of the Trump campaign were also being offered a huge stake in Russian state-owned oil giant Rosneft. And that also happened.

Also remember when Trump was standing there saying he had no business deals in Russia. The dossier says he did. And just a few weeks ago Trump was forced to admit that.

Forget the pissing prostitutes. That probably isn't true and even if it is its not illegal. But that doesn't mean that multiple other things in the dossier have already been proven true. Even admitted by Trump and some of his associates.

 

You keep rambling and rambling and rambling about how "most of the things in the dossier have been proven true". How much? What? Where? When? Name something! Name some fucking thing in the dossier that has proven true!



Match them to the quotes in the dossier. Put up or shutup!

 

First I see you are up to your old tricks of trying to put your words in my mouth. I never said once ever that "most" of the things in the dossier have proven to be true. I have always said multiple things. And I don't have time to research all of them right now. But below is the ones off the top of my head.

And I will add that the reason Putin/Russia were trying to help win the election was because they wanted the sanctions lifted. Which has also been confirmed.

 

Oh, excuse me. You just took the words right out of Rachel Maddow's mouth and you didn't say a fucking word about how much has or hasn't been proven true.

You were only too happy to report that though, weren't you, huh? Let me play your game.

You were. Weren't you?

You did. Didn't you?

 

You moron... big deal.
She paid under a 100,000$ for it & didn't even use the info.
(Big whoop) you're HIGH on fake news buddy....
THAT's NOT A BIG DEAL, compared with the NATIONAL SPECTACLE, & ongoing BAFOONERY (& source of national SHAME);
of PREZ PUSSY-GRABBER!! ...
The stupidest, most retched, petchulent, petty, & shallow, piece of shit that ever was! PLLLUUU--eeezzze!!! Gimme a break.

IMPEACH ORANGE SASQUATCH!

 

Indictments are fake news

 

You've got nothing. Just stop

 

Ya how about all those Clinton indictments eh?

 

Hillary Clinton was and still is a pathological liar and is completely untrustworthy.... Remember her fainting spell at the 9/11 ceremony??? Remember how long it took for her to tell the truth? Just more undeniable proof that Hillary's first instinct is to lie..... Just like she did when she claimed she had taken sniper fire during her trip to Bosnia.... Just as she did when she said she never sent classified documents over her private email server.


Presented for your enjoyment is a list of 10 of Hillary Clinton’s recent and past lies.

Note that this list doesn’t include any of the misrepresentations relating to any of the many scandals she was involved in when while in the White House.

1. Hillary Clinton lied as a staff member of the House Judiciary Committee

Dan Calabrese reveals in his column that former general counsel and chief of staff of the House Judiciary Committee, Jerry Zeifman, indicated that he fired the 27 year old Hillary Rodham from the House Judiciary Committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation due to her lying and unethical conduct. Zeifman said that during the Watergate investigation Hillary lied in a legal brief, them removed evidence from public access that would document her conduct. (Source)

2. Hillary Clinton lied about flying into Bosina under sniper fire

“I remember landing under sniper fire,” she said in Washington on Monday. “There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base.”

News footage of the event however showed her claims to have been wide of the mark, and reporters who accompanied her stated that there was no sniper fire. Her account was ridiculed by ABC News as “like a scene from Saving Private Ryan”. (Source)

3. Hillary Clinton Misrepresented her Record opposing the Iraq War

In Eugene, Ore., Saturday, April 5, 2008, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., attempted to change the measure by which anyone might assess who criticized the Iraq war first, her or Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., by saying those keeping records should start in January 2005, when Obama joined the Senate. (A measure that conveniently avoids her October 2002 vote to authorize use of force against Iraq at a time that Obama was speaking out against the war.) She claimed that using that measure, she criticized the war in Iraq before Obama did.

But Clinton’s claim was false. (Source)

4. Hillary Clinton Misrepresented her Role in the Irish Peace Accord

The historian Tim Pat Coogan told The Chicago Tribune: “It was a nice thing to see her there, with the women’s groups. It helped, I suppose. But it was ancillary to the main thing. It was part of the stage effects, the optics.” Former SDLP man Brian Feeney said pithily: “The road to peace was carefully documented, and she wasn’t on it.” (Source)

5. Hillary Clinton Misrepresented the extent to which her daughter was in danger on 9/11

Clinton said Chelsea had gone on “what she thought was going to be a great jog. She was going to go down to Battery Park, she was going to go around the towers. She went to get a cup of coffee and, and, that’s when the plane hit.”

Responding to a question about whether her daughter heard the “rumble,” Clinton said, “She did hear it.”

Weeks later, Chelsea Clinton told a magazine that she was in an apartment 12 blocks away when the first plane hit. A UPI article said she was outdoors closer to the site when “she heard the rumble of the second tower collapsing.” (Source)

6. Hillary Clinton Claimed she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary

During a stop in Nepal while on a south Asian goodwill tour in April 1995, First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton engaged in a brief (and reportedly coincidental) meeting with Sir Edmund Hillary (who, along with Tenzing Norgay, became the first person to reach the summit of the world’s highest mountain, Mt. Everest, in 1953) and told reporters she had been named after the famed mountain climber. The notion that Ms. Clinton’s given name was inspired by the man who conquered Everest was almost certainly a bit of fiction invented for political expediency (as many critics have noted, Edmund Hillary didn’t become world-famous until six years after Hillary Rodham was born). (Source)

7. Hillary Clinton Lied about supporting NAFTA

On November 1, 1996, United Press International reported that on a trip to Brownsville, Texas, Clinton “touted the president’s support for the North American Free Trade Agreement, saying it would reap widespread benefits in the region.”

The Associated Press followed up the next day noting that Hillary Clinton touted the fact that “the president would continue to support economic growth in South Texas through initiatives such as the North American Free Trade Agreement.”

In her memoir, Clinton wrote, “Senator Dole was genuinely interested in health care reform but wanted to run for president in 1996. He couldn’t hand incumbent Bill Clinton any more legislative victories, particularly after Bill’s successes on the budget, the Brady bill and NAFTA.”

Yes, we are all expected to just forget that, so that Hillary Clinton’s campaign can manufacture supposed “outrage” that anyone would say she supported NAFTA – all at a time her chief strategist, Mark Penn, simultaneously heads a firm that is right now pushing to expand NAFTA into South America.

Penn was recently fired by both Columbia and the Clinton campaign. (Source)

8. Hillary Clinton Lied about her role in the passage of the Family and Medical Leave Act

Her campaign Web site boasts that her record includes “helping to pass the Family and Medical Leave Act.”

But the bill was pushed in Congress for years and passed twice, only to be vetoed by former President George H.W. Bush. Congress passed it a third time as Bill Clinton took office. He signed it into law on Feb. 5, 1993, barely two weeks after he became president.

Hillary Clinton’s own White House schedules, recently released, make no mention of any meetings on the bill. (Source)

9. Hillary Clinton Lied about her trip to Africa

Speaking in Pennsylvania two weeks ago, Clinton introduced former U.S. Ambassador Joe Wilson. “He and I did travel together to Africa and, sort of, paved the way for the president’s trip the following year, which was historic,” Clinton said.

But Wilson didn’t accompany Clinton on her March 1997 trip to Africa. Wilson did accompany both Clintons on the president’s 1998 Africa visit.

“She made a mistake on that,” Wilson said. “She misspoke on that. I worked closely with her and her staff on the president’s trip, which she went on.”

The Clinton administration official who accompanied Clinton on her 1997 trip was Susan Rice, who’s now a senior foreign policy adviser to the Obama campaign. (Source)

10. Hillary Clinton Lied about the “uninsured” woman who died after childbirth

Over the last five weeks, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York has featured in her campaign stump speeches the story of a health care horror: an uninsured pregnant woman who lost her baby and died herself after being denied care by an Ohio hospital because she could not come up with a $100 fee.

The woman, Trina Bachtel, did die last August, two weeks after her baby boy was stillborn at O’Bleness Memorial Hospital in Athens, Ohio. But hospital administrators said Friday that Ms. Bachtel was under the care of an obstetrics practice affiliated with the hospital, that she was never refused treatment and that she was, in fact, insured…

Linda M. Weiss, a spokeswoman for the not-for-profit hospital, said the Clinton campaign had never contacted the hospital to check the accuracy of the story, which Mrs. Clinton had first heard from a Meigs County, Ohio, sheriff’s deputy in late February 2008.

A Clinton spokesman, Mo Elleithee, said candidates would frequently retell stories relayed to them, vetting them when possible. “In this case, we did try but were not able to fully vet it,” Mr. Elleithee said. “If the hospital claims it did not happen that way, we respect that. (Source)

April 7, 2008, Clinton partly vindicated.

Clinton erred in telling audiences that the Ohio woman lacked insurance when seeking help for her troubled pregnancy. But according to Casto’s account, Bachtel’s medical tragedy began with circumstances very close to the essence of Clinton’s now-abandoned account: the lack of insurance created a $100 barrier to needed medical attention close to home. (Source)

 

Have yourself a merry little Friday!