Thank you Stanley for taking out the trash in the gm thread.

 

Whats with all the same name on so many posts....

 

!!!

 

Before the Admin has another minor update the Rules again they might want to hire an adult IT guy to unfuck up the forum first.

A Dedication Page To Petite and Small Breasted Girls

 

Question for you @StanleyOG , who reviews the threads here, on a regular basis, and moves the threads to their proper forums. It appears that you and your staff are relying on the members to report, as opposed to monitoring the activity here. Is that the solution to having moderators?

 

You know my Dad always told me, before you complain about someone try walking a mile in THEIR shoes...

 

So why don't they? We're the ones who have to put up with the postings and the spam. It was much better here when there were moderators located all around the globe.

 

Well @Mr Smith 36 I did walk in the Mod shoes for 3 1/2 yrs and I totally agree with HBG.

There's now 2 staff and a paid Mod they should be able to cover the forums better than what they're doing now.

 

Then there was the time when someone at xnxx headquarters made a boo boo and for a short time banned every member at once.

 

That was most likely a nice break for most members. Others such as JPT, D.L. and Stumbler most likey were in a severe state of depression. I'm so glad the folks at XNXX managed to get the site back up, I was extremely concerned about our members that practically live here.

 

I've never been banned and been here since 11 years. Perhaps it happened when I was traveling. I just never saw it.

 

1. Moderators were not always babysat. And many of us know a lot about how the moderators worked because they were our friends, even after they were no longer mods. The moderators from a long time ago were not babysat and not until ILMJ took over as admin did that happen. Up until that point, they were trained and respected to do the job, without being paid. When they got rid of the volunteers, none of the paid mods worked out.

2. Who assigned a 5 minute response time? It was not mentioned in my question at all. If you had read my question instead of quoting CA, you would have know that I asked if you were relying on reports from the members as opposed to have mods who were proactive, spotted offenses and took care of them.

3. I have not talked about this non-stop, and I very rarely address you at all. I am normally saying good morning and then moving onto the other threads. I asked a question. I was not rude and then I was rudely spoken to by CA. When Randy Knight notes that it was rude, then it really was, because he's not known for being warm and fuzzy.

And 4, because there is always a #4, I asked you the question, not CA. Had I wanted an answer from CA, I would have asked CA. As CA pointed out, he apparently does not count as staff. I questioned the administrator because I wanted to know they truth, and yet my simply question was never answered.

Tell me, what was so rude or invasive about my question that you still didn't answer it?: Who reviews the threads here, on a regular basis, and moves the threads to their proper forums? It appears that you and your staff are relying on the members to report, as opposed to monitoring the activity here. Is that the solution to having moderators?

 

In no way am I trying to be disrespectful, BUT..............
In my humble opinion for what it's worth, on a Website with forums, Moderators are needed.
The reason they're needed you answered yourself in your post being "And before I forget, I didn't answer you because I thought that @CollectiveArbiter answer was enough and at the time I had a lot of work to do, which you know nothing about".

The thing is, many of us are aware of the work needed in administering to a Website.
Such as Website security, (i.e., malware distribution, spam, phishing, etc..), vulnerability in code, content, advertising, content legalities, data theft, IT management, web servers, web software, user accounts, passwords, and the list goes on, and on!

Your workload is immense, and I'm sorry that it's the position your caught in, but that's where Moderators come in. As long as Moderators have been given strict guidelines to follow, as well as limitations on the actions they can impose, your workload could be seriously reduced, and issues which are your main concern, will then have the time to be dealt with, and with a lot less stress for you.

The vast majority of members on any site won't report posts with content that could have legal implications for a Website. Moderators cruising forums, and content posted by other sites, and members which could have legal implications could be noted by your Moderators, and reported for review by Administration for potential removal, saving untold dollars in potential legal fees, fines, or possible imprisonment for potentially illegal content.

The use of Moderators of course is purely at the discretion of a sites Administration, but the advantages more often than not, would far out-way any discomfort in their use.

Part of any basic directive given to Moderators in identifying posts which breach a sites rules would be,
"if it walks and talks like a duck, it’s probably a duck". Deal with it. Then you wouldn't have to.

Just my opinion. I'm hoping it's something you'll continue discussing.
.
Moderated Forums clean up! LOL Sorry, couldn't resist.

 

You need to take a few minutes out of your oh so busy day and get some pussy...your'e about a grouchy mother fucker.

AND... it's ''too''...not ''to''

Lets all think about that.

 

You people must not have learned anything by watching the rabbit.
Maybe it would be a good idea to go to his forum.

 

You think Stanley scares me?

His bag full of shit aint no different than any other bag of shit.

 

Isn't that about what the rabbit said?