Aw, look at you, spreading fake news and neo-nazi propaganda.

 

The New York Times is one of the most prestigious English language newspapers in the world. Only a fool dares to question the authority of The New York Times.

 

It WAS...

 

By publishing The Pentagon Papers The New York Times set in motion the events that destroyed the presidency of Richard Nixon. Now The New York Times is working to destroy the presidency of Donald Trump. Trump does not have a chance.

 

Oh what a fool you are... you STILL believe the MSM. Didn't you learn anything last November? I invite you to chastise Mr Smith in November of 2020. You can blow all the smoke you want now, just like the smoke you blew last October. President Trump is the PRESIDENT. He will remain president for the next 7+ years. You'll just have to resign to that FACT. Funny how you can't change facts, huh?

 

LOL, dream on.... Hillary Clinton will be behind bars before that happens....

 

the nyt is setting new subscribers records

 

LOL, New York Times = Graveyard of serious journalism.... This along with there quarterly earnings and ad revenues have been in a steady decline...

The funny part is, most of it's "new subscribers" are free one year subscriptions that the bathroom floor rag has sent out hoping to attracted readers to increase sponsors for ad revenue....

 

nyt profits are up 10 percent. Both ads and subscribers

 

From the WSJ
New York Times Profit Slumps; Print Ad Sales Drop 19%
Overall advertising revenue decreases 7.7% in the third quarter
By Tess Stynes and Lukas I. Alpert

 

If they survive another 5 years I'll be shocked. President Trump is doing all he can to help keep them relevant... but it doesn't appear to be helping.

 

old news. But you already know that. What i posred was from 7/27/17

 

I am glad. I have subscribed for years.

 

nyt 166 years old. Next 5 years no problem

 

The New York Times Will Seek Non-Profit Partners To Shore Up Revenue

by Jeremy Gerard
September 5, 2017 9:37am



3


BUSINESS
BREAKING NEWS
MEDIA
DEAN BAQUET
JOSEPH KAHN
NEW YORK TIMES
The New York Times
New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet and his No. 2, Joseph Kahn, told staff members this weekend that the company will seek non-profit partners to help offset the costs of its journalism at a time when advertising revenue continues its quicksand downward spiral.

RelatedSarah Palin's New York Times Defamation Lawsuit Ended By Judge
In a memo to staff that was remarkable in its forthright revelation of the economic challenges facing the paper, Baquet and Kahn said that NYT administrative veteran Janet Elder will “build an operation that will allow The Times to seek philanthropic funding for ambitious journalism.”

“Over the past year a host of philanthropies and universities have come forward asking to help support our journalism,” they wrote September 1. “Invariably, they say we are one of the few institutions with the independence and ambition to take on the largest subjects here and abroad. This is one of the most compelling developments in our business. Philanthropies across the country are providing money for big investigations, including our own ‘Fractured Lands,’ the magazine’s epic examination of the post-Arab Spring Middle East, which was funded in part by the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting.”

Read the full memo here.


Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP/REX/Shutterstock
The Times move to seek financial partners comes at a critical point for the paper, which is locked in a ferocious competition with the Washington Post over coverage of the Trump Administration. Trading scoops by the day, and sometimes by the hour, the two papers have beefed up their reporting staffs in some areas – particularly in their Washington and foreign bureaus – while trimming elsewhere. At 1,300 people, the Times staff is nearly double that of the Post‘s 750. Total subscriptions to The Times exceed 3 million, two-thirds of which are digital-only, while advertisers are diverting their dollars to online giants Facebook, Amazon and Alphabet. (The Post is owned by Amazon chief Jeff Bezos.)

In recent years, The Times, along with most major newspapers, has published reporting jointly produced by its reporters and non-profit journalism ventures including the foundation-supported ProPublica, The Center for Investigative Reporting and the Center for Public Integrity.

At the same time, the paper has shown a reluctance to cede control of its own standards, at a cost to its competitiveness. That was notably the case with the Panama Papers, in 2015, when some 11.5 million documents from Panama-based law firm Mossack Fonseca, detailing decades of barely legal off-shore companies created as tax shelters, were published by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. While the explosive story commanded headlines around the world, The Times held off for days as it conducted its own investigation of the documents, leading to criticism from both within and outside its Eighth Avenue headquarters.

In the digital age, two years is an eternity, however. The Baquet/Kahn memo acknowledges both the challenge of accepting outside help and the need to new revenue streams.

“Janet’s initial task will be to begin a dialogue, both internally and externally, about different types of nonprofit funding and the kinds of newsroom activities that might be supported, as well as addressing legal questions and potential ethical considerations in moving in this direction,” they wrote.

The leaked memo was immediately cast as an industry bellwether. “Being so forthright about its search for non-subscriber or non-advertising help is notable,” the Poynter Institute observed, “especially with self-sustaining future media business models so very unclear. This search is important and, as folks at The Times know, not without peril.

“Taking money from a group like the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting is one thing…But taking money directly from donors is inherently troublesome. Even if donors don’t make clear their desire for a particular thesis or ideological slant, there are the potentials for self-censorship. Money talks.”

 

The first sentence says it all... quicksand downward spiral.

 

This from people who link breitbart and info wars.

 

Poll: 'National Enquirer' Still More Accurate Than 'New York Times'

 

LOL! The geniuses at the NY Times.


New York Times offers new subscribers a free Google Home


10/4/17

The New York Times has been upping its tech game recently in hopes to keep subscription numbers up in an age of free internet news. It made digital access free during the 2016 election, bundled free Spotify accountsthis past February and bought a VR agency to help the Times create immersive news content. Now you can get a "free" Google Home smart speaker with a $17 per month All Access or $18 per month Home Delivery subscription.

While a $10 per month Basic subscription is available, you'll need to drop a little more cash to get the Google Home. With All Access, subscribers will also get the NYT Crossword, NYTimes Cooking, and a free subscription to give to someone else. Google Home retails at $130, so this option (which comes up to $204 for twelve months) is a pretty solid offer if you already want the NYT daily. The Home Delivery option gives you all of the above, plus an actual paper edition delivered to your home daily, along with some extra behind-the-scenes content and special print-only features like The New York Times for Kids and dedicated crossword sections. You'll get two All Access subscriptions to give away, too.

The Google Home offer is only available until December 31st of this year (or when supplies run out). When you pay for the subscription option, you'll get a code that can be redeemed at the Google store; it must be redeemed by March 18th, 2018.

Update: As noted by The Verge, it seems that the NYT has pulled the offer already after several people signed up, got a Google Home code, then canceled their subscription after paying only $17 for the first month of service. (h/t Joshua Allen)