If the American public actually questioned the authenticity of their news instead of just believing anything that supports whichever side of the fence they sit, then their gullibility quotient would at least go down! They could then have an informed debate and make some fact based decisions rather than being righteously blind as most of them are right now!

Thinskin

 

The man loves platitudes... And whatever process he started, it's all about billionaires!

 

I hope you pick him.....

 

So... the Washington Post, which is against Trump, claims that a Consensus of Scientists at the CIA says it was the Russians. And won't cite a single authority. Or a single fact. Or anything whatsoever. Except their own opinion. On the Consensus of Climatologists or whatever they are.

And a "bipartisan" gang of thugs in the legislature want an investigation.

Trump won because most of the country no longer trusts the Washington Post anymore. (Or any of the other lamestream leftist rags.) Trump also won because no one cares what the "bipartisan" thugs in the legislature have to say, either.

No. We don't need an investigation. What we need is for the LOSERS to MOVVVVVVVVE ONNNNNNNNN.

 

John McCain was a never Trump guy and one big reason is that Trump remembers when McCain and Charles Keating
took down the savings and loan business in the entire USA....

McCain should have gone to prison in the late 80's.....

In his early days as a freshman senator, McCain was known for accepting contributions from Charles Keating Jr., flying to the banker's home in the Bahamas on company planes and taking up Keating's cause with U.S. financial regulators as they investigated him.

The Keating Five was the derisive name given McCain and four Democratic senators, including then-Sen. John Glenn of Ohio, who were defendants in a congressional ethics investigation of their connections to Keating. McCain is the only one still in the Senate. They were accused of trying to intimidate regulators on behalf of Keating, a real estate developer in Arizona and owner of Lincoln Savings and Loan based in Irvine, Calif.

Keating and his associates raised $1.3 million combined for the campaigns and political causes of all five. McCain's campaigns received $112,000.

McCain: The Most Reprehensible of the Keating Five

http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/mccain-the-most-reprehensible-of-the-keating-five-6431838

 

Stop whining you gonna be fine at least we wont nuke you for sure 8 yearsh

 

Shouldn't you be off sharing a troff somewhere with that pig brandi deciding which of you is a bigger cunt ???

What's this "we" shit, you got crabs or somethinjg ???

 

Bunny havent u suck no dick today to be so cross, have a patience may be some coloured will sprey some cum on you

 

So are you saying that John McCain is lying and there are no facts pointing to Russia's hacking or our presidential election?

 

There are no facts it was the Russians.....could have been anyone....could have been insiders leaking stuff out....
john McCains's opinion only.....when you say Facts are there, then present them......

i would like to know all the country's that are hacking us.....china-N korea-Israel-iran.....

But just maybe she lost because the DNC was just to too corrupt and their e-mails showed that the primary was rigged for Hillary and
why would you even run someone under investigation by the FBI that has withheld-destroyed evidence as well as lied repeatably to the american public..

 

On January 21, this tempest in a teapot dies with all the others. But the snowflakes are going to bitch and moan right up to the witching hour.

 

McCain! At CBS! Where the news is fake but accurate! ROFL

I think we can all agree that the facts are beyond John McCain's reach. Someone fetch a phonebook! Give him a boost!

 

The LIBS are just tring to do to Trump what they tried to do to Bush. Illegitimize his presidency.

 

College instructor tells students that Trump’s election was an ‘act of terrorism’
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...s-an-act-of-terrorism/?utm_term=.4a1f711c343a

Like many Americans, Olga Perez Stable Cox has strong feelings about the outcome of this year’s presidential election.

Unlike many Americans, her job offers the convenience of a captive audience with whom she can share those feelings.

Cox, a professor at Orange Coast College in Costa Mesa, Calif., did exactly that days after the election while standing in front of her students in a class — unleashing a multi-minute, hyperbole-filled harangue in which she called Donald Trump’s election an “act of terrorism,” referred to the president-elect as a “white supremacist” and said “we have been assaulted.”

Cox — a psychology professor who teaches a class on human sexuality — referred to Vice President-elect Mike Pence as “one of the most anti-gay humans in the country.” She also told her students that the nation is as divided now as it was “in Civil War times.”



The Orange Coast College Republicans in Costa Mesa, Calif.,
are filing a complaint against human sexuality professor Olga Perez Stable Cox
after video shows her criticizing the outcome of the election.

 

Note the clock directly below:


Barack Obama has ordered a "full review" of cyber-chicanery associated with the 2016 elections, under the belief that Russia may have tampered with our sacred voting process by somehow having created a 30 year history of corruption by Hillary Clinton and everyone she's ever been in contact with.

Where do we even begin? The CIA - no doubt under orders and perhaps the threat of waterboarding - has issued a strong but factually vague statement that people who may have connections to people who may be Russian may have provided Wikileaks with vast amounts of hacked information about Hillary's decades-long history of sleazy deals and ineptitude, which may have influenced the election because (unlike most information given to voters) it was all true.

The accusations would be more plausible if the CIA, FBI, and DOJ weren't so thoroughly compromised by their own political cover-ups and scandals at this point. As their main mission is now the protection of undeserving Democratic asses, we're not exactly impressed with anything they're saying now.

And just how "meta" is the accusation that Russia tried to corrupt our election process by releasing proof (and plenty of it) that Hillary and the DNC had already corrupted the election process? Who's the actual criminal here, and who's simply a witness?

Hope n' Change actually thinks it pretty unlikely that Russia had anything to do with the release of damning information about Hillary and her cohorts in crime. After all, if they had hacked all this dirt (not to mention every Top Secret hosted on her email server) wouldn't they want Hillary to win so that they'd own an American President because of all the blackmail potential?

That's why we think it far more likely that the source of the hacked material was an individual patriot from the Democratic party or a domestic intelligence agency who saw this as the only way to save America from a corrupt, shrieking, money-grubbing, two-faced, brain-damaged harpy with a gift for screwing up every policy issue she's ever touched.

Obama's highly publicized demand for a report on computer espionage is supposed to be rushed to his Oval Office desk (no doubt to be left between his fingernail clippings and scuff marks from the heels of his shoes), but the results may never be made public. Which is hardly surprising, considering that the actual purpose of Obama's call for an investigation is simply to delegitimize the upcoming Presidency of Donald Trump.

In other words, a hostile government really is trying to subvert the will of American voters. It just happens to be the government currently in Washington.

 

cliffs notes




(What? Well, a little post-inaugural bounce would be normal.)

Aaand there’s the media/pundit/fake-news/ministry-of-truth cabal, of course

​

Seems that Progressivism has passed its (wait for it…) acme.

 

Are you saying this is not a fact?

CIA has high confidence Russians tried to influence election in Trump's favor

Intelligence sources confirm that the CIA has high confidence that the Russians tried to influence the presidential election and that they favored Donald Trump, CBS News’ Jeff Pegues reports.

 

Electors demand intelligence report on Russian hacking before Electoral College vote

group of bipartisan electors are calling on U.S. intelligence officials to release findings on Russia’s involvement in the U.S. election prior to the Electoral College vote that will make Donald Trump’s presidential election official.

In an open letter to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on Monday, a group of nine electors representing both parties vow to discharge their duties by the standard described in Alexander Hamilton’s The Federalist Paper No. 68.

“We intend to discharge our duties as Electors by ensuring that we select a candidate for president who, as our Founding Fathers envisioned, would be ‘endowed with the requisite qualifications,'” the letter states. “[T]he Constitution envisions the Electoral College as a deliberative body that plays a critical role in our system of government — ensuring that the American people elect a president who is constitutionally qualified and fit to serve.”

The electors note that the intelligence community has concluded with “high confidence” that Russia acted to interfere in the U.S. election to the benefit of Trump.

“According to reports in the Washington Post, New York Times, and other outlets, the United States intelligence community has now concluded definitively that the Russian interference was performed to help Donald Trump get elected, yet even today Mr. Trump is refusing to accept that finding,” the letter states. “Separate from Mr. Trump’s own denials of Russian involvement in the election, the confirmed communication between Trump’s aides and those associated with the Russian election interference activity raise serious concerns that must be addressed before we cast our votes.”

nt
Among the electors’ concerns are allegations that Russian government officials “maintained contact with the Trump campaign during the election,” reports of a propaganda operation to “sway American public opinion in favor of Ukraine’s pro-Putin government” and relationships between Trump associations and Russia President Vladimir Putin.

The letter continues:

The Electors require to know from the intelligence community whether there are ongoing investigations into ties between Donald Trump, his campaign or associates, and Russian government interference in the election, the scope of those investigations, how far those investigations may have reached, and who was involved in those investigations. We further require a briefing on all investigative findings, as these matters directly impact the core factors in our deliberations of whether Mr. Trump is fit to serve as President of the United States.

The electors also demand that Trump provide “conclusive evidence that he and his staff and advisors did not accept Russian interference, or otherwise collaborate during the campaign, and conclusive disavowal and repudiation of such collaboration and interference going forward.”