Im with you ,how did get here lol

 

Michael Cohen has spent at least 50 hours meeting with investigators: report

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...ohen-has-spent-at-least-50-hours-meeting-with

 

Has Stormy paid Trump's legal fees yet?

 

What A tangled web we weave

 

Who?????

 

Avenatti

 

Doesn't ring a bell.

 

Hey guys anybody seen Rudy lately? What ever happened to him?

 

Dont worry kid.

 

Michael Avenatti ordered by judge to hand over $4.85 million in back pay to attorney at his former law firm

By Greg Norman | Fox News


Federal judge dismisses Stormy Daniels' defamation lawsuit against President Trump, awards Trump attorneys' fees.

Michael Avenatti -- the lawyer who became famous representing porn star Stormy Daniels, later served as counsel for a woman whose claims of a gang rape ring run by a Supreme Court nominee were quickly cast into doubt and who is now mentioned as a possible 2020 Democratic presidential candidate -- was ordered to pay nearly $5 million to an attorney at his former firm, a California judge ruled Monday.



The judge at the hearing in Los Angeles County Superior Court – which Avenatti did not attend -- said Avenatti must pay $4.85 million because he personally guaranteed a settlement with attorney Jason Frank in a lawsuit over back pay.


Frank had alleged the firm misstated its profits and he was owed millions.

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Dennis Landin issued the ruling after turning down a request from Avenatti to have the matter moved to federal court, which the opposing side called a delay tactic.

Monday's decision also follows an earlier ruling from a U.S. bankruptcy court judge who ordered Avenatti's former firm to pay $10 million to Frank.

 

And that's only one out of two bad hair days (all in one day, even).


Michael Avenatti Insists He’s Not On the Hook for Old Firm’s Unpaid Rent but Won’t Say Who Is


10/22/18

Who is responsible for the old law firm that bore Michael Avenatti‘s name? That seems to be the big question as the Eagan Avenatti firm is being kicked out of its office space after not paying rent for four months.

The legal problem was first reported in an article by The Daily Beast, which said that the firm–named for Avenatti and attorney Michael Eagan–rented an 8,371-square-foot space and three storage facilities, with a claim that it owed $213,253 in back rent.

Exactly who is on the hook for that money remained a mystery, at least to the public. Law&Crime reached out to the Irvine Company, which is the management organization for the properties, but they have yet to respond.

When asked about all of this, Avenatti claimed he has nothing to do with it.

“Garbage. Old news. I have no responsibility for anything relating to the lease and haven’t for some time,” he said. Avenatti did not answer questions about who is currently responsible or whose name is on the lease.

Generally speaking, if Avenatti’s name is on the lease, he could still be on the hook, even if he sublet the property or assigned the lease to another party. If he was not personally named, and only the firm is listed, then whoever now controls the firm would be responsible.

Note: This article has been updated with the result of the trial and decision to evict.

 

Which is why I literally laugh at you fools saying Avenatti is going to run for president. Fucking hilarious.

 

Well, but us fools didn't make it up

Avenatti started running about drumming up support.

 

Any fool can run for president but only fools think they even have a chance.

Michael Avenatti Lived the High Life While Owing Millions to IRS
As Michael Avenatti floats a 2020 presidential run, court records reveal the lawyer and his companies owed millions in unpaid taxes and judgments.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/micha...igh-life-while-owing-millions-to-irs?ref=home

 

And I will speak for myself.

Yes I did post about Avenatti saying he was THINKING about running for president because the idea is just laughable to progressive/liberal/Democrats because there is no way we would support a mirror image of Trump. Yes we do get a kick out of him beating Trump at his own game and appreciate him proving Trump, Cohen, and others are just stupid liars.

But only fools, and you can see them right here, would think Avenatti has Democratic support.

And by the way I don't just call people liars. I PROVE they are.

 

Jeez.
Did we forget who started this thread? And who posted glowing reports of avenatti owning trump on a regular basis, and how avenatti doesn't bluff?

Course, now that avenatti has been caught with his thumb up his ass and the courts have started yanking his chain, the copy n paste and comments have taken a decidedly different tone.

A classic example of how one can go from hero to zero faster than a speeding bullet in despicable land.

 

Better buckle up buttercup....


Grassley sends criminal referral for attorney Michael Avenatti and Kavanaugh accuser

By Brooke Singman | Fox News



Julie Swetnick is the third woman to accuse Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley said Thursday he has referred attorney Michael Avenatti and client Julie Swetnick -- who accused Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct during confirmation proceedings -- for criminal investigation regarding a potential “conspiracy” to provide false statements to Congress and obstruct its investigation.



Avenatti, who also is a potential 2020 Democratic presidential candidate and works as the attorney for porn star Stormy Daniels, represented Swetnick, who accused Kavanaugh of being involved in or present at “gang” and “train” rapes at high school parties during the 1980s. He denied it.


Grassley penned a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and FBI Director Christopher Wray Thursday, claiming Swetnick and Avenatti’s allegations were leveled at a “suspicious” time.

“When a well-meaning citizen comes forward with information relevant to the committee’s work, I take it seriously. It takes courage to come forward, especially with allegations of sexual misconduct or personal trauma. I’m grateful for those who find that courage,” Grassley wrote.

“But in the heat of partisan moments, some do try to knowingly mislead the committee. That’s unfair to my colleagues, the nominees, and others providing information who are seeking the truth,” Grassley continued. “It stifles our ability to work on legitimate lines of inquiry. It also wastes time and resources for destructive reasons.”


Avenatti fired back: "It is ironic that Senator Grassley now is interested in investigations. He didn’t care when it came to putting a man on the SCOTUS for life. We welcome the investigation as now we can finally get to the bottom of Judge Kavanaugh’s lies and conduct. Let the truth be known."


In the letter, Grassley cited contradictory statements by both Avenatti and Swetnick in media interviews, specifically pointing to an NBC interview on Oct. 1, when Swentick walked back the claim that she watched Kavanaugh spike the punch at parties.

“I saw [Kavanaugh] giving red solo cups to quite a few girls,” Swetnick said in the interview, adding that she didn’t “know what he did.”

Swetnick merely claimed she “saw him” by the punch—a comment that contradicted her sworn statement to the committee.

Grassley also said that Avenatti and Swetnick provided “simply no credible evidence that Ms. Swetnick ever even met or socialized with Judge Kavanaugh,” but said “there is substantial evidence they did not know each other.”

Grassley blasted both Swetnick and Avenatti's credibility, citing past personal and financial dealings.

The Swentick allegations surfaced during an explosive confirmation process for President Trump’s then-Supreme Court nominee.

Kavanaugh was first accused of sexual assault by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who shared her testimony on Capitol Hill last month. Ford accused Kavanaugh of pinning her to a bed and trying to remove her clothing at a high school party more than 30 years ago.

Following Ford’s allegations, several other women—Swentick, and Deborah Ramirez, who claims Kavanaugh exposed himself to her while at a dorm party during their freshman year at Yale University—also came forward.

Kavanaugh vehemently denied the allegations, in sworn written statements and in testimony before the Judiciary Committee.

After bipartisan calls, the allegations were further investigated as part of an FBI supplemental background probe. Republican senators briefed on the findings said there was no evidence to support the allegations.

Earlier this month, Kavanaugh was confirmed by the Senate on a 50-48 margin to the high court, and sworn in by Trump at the White House.

Grassley’s criminal referral of Avenatti and Swetnick was not the first connected to the Kavanaugh confirmation process –last month, Grassley referred an individual who made false sexual assault allegations against Kavanaugh.

”Thankfully, the law prohibits such false statements to Congress and obstruction of congressional committee investigations,” Grassley wrote. “For the law to work, we can’t just brush aside potential violations. I don’t take lightly making a referral of this nature, but ignoring this behavior will just invite more of it in the future.”

 

Uh Oh!

 

hi are you available to chat some

 

I think he's talking to you, @shootersa. Wanna chat with George?