Yep. Blame it all on Trump.
No matter.
If Democrats can't take back at least the house in the mid terms (and they should) nothing much else will matter to them.

 

If they stop throwing their kids across the boarder, they wouldn't get separated big dummies . I can't understand why anybody wants to come to this country anyway, reading how bad we are . Why would they still try to break into this country.

I would never go to the border,and throw my kids into Mexico lol.
And I bet you Mexico wouldn't let me anyway

 

This is What it's Really about.................

The U.S. is locking up more illegal immigrants than ever, generating lucrative profits for the nation's largest prison companies, and an Associated Press review shows the businesses have spent tens of millions of dollars lobbying lawmakers and contributing to campaigns.

The cost to American taxpayers is on track to top $2 billion for this year, and the companies are expecting their biggest cut of that yet in the next few years thanks to government plans for new facilities to house the 400,000 immigrants detained annually.

After a decade of expansion, the sprawling, private system runs detention centers everywhere from a Denver suburb to an industrial area flanking Newark's airport, and is largely controlled by just three companies.

The growth is far from over, despite the sheer drop in illegal immigration in recent years.

The companies also have raked in cash from subsidiaries that provide health care and transportation. And they are holding more immigrants convicted of federal crimes in their privately-run prisons.

The financial boom, which has helped save some of these companies from the brink of bankruptcy, has occurred even though federal officials acknowledge privatization isn't necessarily cheaper.

This seismic shift toward a privatized system happened quietly. While Congress' unsuccessful efforts to overhaul immigration laws drew headlines and sparked massive demonstrations, lawmakers' negotiations to boost detention dollars received far less attention.

The industry's giants — Corrections Corporation of America, The GEO Group, and Management and Training Corp. — have spent at least $45 million combined on campaign donations and lobbyists at the state and federal level in the last decade, the AP found.

CCA and GEO, who manage most private detention centers, insist they aren't trying to influence immigration policy to make more money, and their lobbying and campaign donations have been legal.

"As a matter of long-standing corporate policy, CCA does not lobby on issues that would determine the basis for an individual's detention or incarceration," CCA spokesman Steve Owen said in an email to the AP. The company has a website dedicated to debunking such allegations.

GEO, which was part of The Wackenhut Corp. security firm until 2003, and Management and Training Corp. declined repeated interview requests.

Advocates for immigrants are skeptical of claims that the lobbying is not meant to influence policy.

"That's a lot of money to listen quietly," said Peter Cervantes-Gautschi, who has helped lead a campaign to encourage large banks and mutual funds to divest from the prison companies.

The detention centers are located in cities and remote areas alike, often in low-slung buildings surrounded by chain-link fences and razor wire. U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement agents detain men, women and children suspected of violating civil immigration laws at these facilities. Most of those held at the 250 sites nationwide are illegal immigrants awaiting deportation, but some green card holders, asylum seekers and others are also there.

It's a millionaire's business, and they are living off profits from each one of the people who go through there every single night," said Guzman, now a cable installer in Durham, N.C. "It's our money that we earn as taxpayers every day that goes to finance this."

# MAGA .......................

 

Good. Excellent. Business is booming, we're locking up ILLEGAL imigrants and unsupporters are frothing.
What's not to like?

 

... and cheaper yet to just turn them back at the border, but contrary to the propoganda, we aren't heathens.

 

Trump detention move on immigrant families promises to draw court challenge

http://thehill.com/latino/405650-tr...ant-families-promises-to-draw-court-challenge

 

So now I guess Trump is just going to go with concentration camps.

HHS Expands 360-Bed Migrant Children Tent Shelter To 3,600 Beds

 

Why yes.
And after he gets rid of the kids hes gonna start rounding up unsupporters....
Jesus

 

FUCK AlL Those Kids And Thier Families

They Shouldn't Come To OUR Hatefull
Lol. This is a terrible place to live why would they want to live here.
( there is a solution)
All you good hearted Libby folk could adopt these children take them into your home. Feed them clothe them. Welcome them into your neighborhood , especially if you live in Canada. Lm fucking ass off
Lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol
Please hear the cry of the children
All libs unite go to the border. And take these children home . Show the good you have in your heart but use your own money to do it

 

Detention of Migrant Children Has Skyrocketed to Highest Levels Ever
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...o-highest-levels-ever/ar-BBNfvAM?ocid=U220DHP

Even though hundreds of children separated from their families after crossing the border have been released under court order, the overall number of migrant children under detention has exploded to the highest ever recorded — a significant counternarrative to the Trump administration’s efforts to reduce the number of undocumented families coming to the United States.

Population levels at federally contracted shelters for migrant children have quietly shot up more than fivefold since last summer, according to data obtained by The New York Times, reaching a total of 12,800 this month. There were 2,400 such children in custody in May 2017.

The huge increases, which have placed the federal shelter system near capacity, are due not to an influx of children entering the country, but a reduction in the number being released to live with families and other sponsors, the data collected by the Department of Health and Human Services suggests. Some of those who work in the migrant shelter network say the bottleneck is straining both the children and the system that cares for them.

Sign Up for the Morning Briefing Newsletter

Most of the children crossed the border alone, without their parents. Many are teenagers from Central America, and they are housed in a system of more than 100 shelters across the United States, with the highest concentration near the southwest border.

The new data was reported to members of Congress, who shared it with The Times. It shows that despite the Trump administration’s efforts to discourage Central American migrants, roughly the same number of children are crossing the border as in years past. The big difference, said those familiar with the shelter system, is that red tape and fear brought on by stricter immigration enforcement have discouraged relatives and family friends from coming forward to sponsor children.

Shelter capacities have hovered close to 90 percent since at least May, compared to about 30 percent a year ago. Any new surge in border crossings, which could happen at any time, could quickly overwhelm the system, operators say.

“The closer they get to 100 percent, the less ability they will have to address anything unforeseen,” said Mark Greenberg, who oversaw the care of migrant children for the Health and Human Services Department under President Barack Obama. “Even if there’s not a sudden influx, they will be running out of capacity soon unless something changes.”

The administration appeared to move to address that on Tuesday, when it announced that it will triple the size of a temporary “tent city” in Tornillo, Tex., to house up to 3,800 children through the end of the year. Immigrant advocates and members of Congress reacted to the news with distress, because conditions are comparatively harsh in such large overflow facilities, compared with traditional shelters.

Facilities like the one in Tornillo are also more expensive to operate, according to Representative Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut, the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations subcommittee that funds the shelter program. She said such facilities cost about $750 per child per day, or three times the amount of a typical shelter.

“You are flying in the face of child welfare, and we’re doing it by design,” Ms. DeLauro said. “You drive up the cost and you prolong the trauma on these children.”

Federal authorities said they were dealing with high levels of illegal border crossings and requests for asylum. “The number of unaccompanied alien children apprehended are a symptom of the larger issue of a broken immigration system,” Evelyn Stauffer, press secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services, said in a statement. “That is why H.H.S. joins the president in calling on Congress to address this broken system and the pull factors that have led to increasing numbers at the U.S. border.”

The system for sheltering migrant children came under scrutiny this summer, when more than 2,500 children who were separated from their parents were housed in federally contracted shelters under the Trump administration’s zero tolerance border enforcement policy. But those children were only a fraction of the total number of children who are currently detained.

Historically, children categorized as “unaccompanied” have been placed with sponsors, such as parents already in the United States, extended family members or family friends, as soon as the sponsors can be vetted by federal authorities. But the new data shows that the placement process has slowed significantly. Monthly releases have plummeted by about two-thirds since last year.

The delays in vetting sponsors relate, in part, to changes the Trump administration has made in how the process works. In June, the authorities announced that potential sponsors and other adult members of their households would have to submit fingerprints, and that the data would be shared with immigration authorities.

Traditionally, most sponsors have been undocumented themselves, and therefore are wary of risking deportation by stepping forward to claim sponsorship of a child. Even those who are willing to become sponsors have had to wait months to be fingerprinted and otherwise reviewed.

Federal officials say their vetting procedures are designed to safeguard the children in their care.

“Children who enter the country illegally are at high risk for exploitation by traffickers and smugglers,” Ms. Stauffer said in her statement.

But the longer children are detained, the more anxious and depressed they are likely to become, according to Mr. Wagner, who oversaw the program under Mr. Obama. When that happens, children may try to harm themselves or escape, and can become violent with the staff and with one another, he said.

Stories of such behavior have emerged through reporting in recent months as the shelter system has faced intense criticism by members of Congress and the public.

“Being in congregate care for an extended period of time is not a good thing. It increases the likelihood of things going wrong,” Mr. Wagner said.

The administration funneled children who were separated from their parents into the shelter system this summer under the earlier policy, without any apparent collaboration with the officials who oversee the shelter program.

The separated children injected a new degree of chaos into the facilities, according to several shelter operators, who spoke anonymously because they are barred by the government from speaking to the news media. The children were younger and more traumatized than those the shelters were used to dealing with, and they arrived without a plan for when they could be released or to whom.

But the system had already been overwhelmed for months, operators said, as children continued to flow in while fewer were being discharged.

The shelter system has overflowed before. In 2014, when unaccompanied children flooded across the border in unprecedented numbers, a lack of shelter space led to a backup of children at the border in what authorities referred to at the time as a humanitarian crisis.

Since then, new facilities have been constructed or arranged by contract — and they are now nearing capacity.


Hush....an alias

 

Feel free to get your Liberal ass is down there with your own money and take care of those children.
Second option, tell what horrible people we are. Tell them there's a non sympathetic regime in power now ,with common sense . And America is a terrible place to live . tell them go back to your third world country where life is so much better lol lol lol
You hypocrites crack me up if you feel so bad start sending your Paychex down there that I'm some houses in their own countries.

 

Start sending your Paychex down there so they can build houses in their own countries.

 

You are just such a stupid, ignorant (two different things) fool.

There are people all over the country willing to take those kids in. Or even parents and kids while they await their asylum hearings. And the Trump administration refuses to release those kids to anyone which is why they are now holding a record number of kids.

While in the meantime ....

Arrests of migrant families surged 38% in August, data show

https://www.oregonlive.com/today/index.ssf/2018/09/2018_primaries_rematch_for_rho.html

 

Why yes.
Over 600,000 AMERICAN kids in foster care, and some 120,000 of them will never be reunited with their families or adopted. But lets race to place ILLEGAL immigrants with American families, cause you know, they are more deserving and important than AMERICAN kids.

 

Yeah so let's put those non American kids in concentration camps on the border and just hold them there indefinitely.

Because you know... Trump must be supported in all things.

 

It's not a Trump issue. It's an immigration issue. Trump is dealing with it, unlike the previous presidents.

Turn them around and send them back to where they belong.

 

So tell me STUMBLES how much money have sent to your special cause . How many kids are you going adopt.
Let me answer for you , and all the rest the gang crying about the pour children.
You have sent ZERO and you are going to send ZERO. How many immigrant children are you going to adopt? ZERO

The best thing to do is buy bus tickets to Canada . For the mothers fathers and the children. that way they can all be together in a civilized country. But I bet the citizens of Canada would not like that

 

And in the meantime the owner of the mushroom plant near where I live is in danger of losing his crop because he can't find pickers. Crops in California are also in danger of being lost for the same reason. Which increases the price of food for all of us.

While we tax payers are spending millions of dollars a day to hold women and kids and people who know how to do those jobs.

And some think that is a pretty good deal. And if it is then what you need to do is get a job picking crops.

Or at least get a fucking job.

 

Jesus

The general spews about fat greedy employers taking advantage of poor ILLEGAL immigrants.

But, it turns out, only when it fits his narrative.

Lying hypocrite