i say the more stories the better
besides who can honestly say wen there driving they dont look at scool girls

 

Thoughtful guy

I like that you think out what you are saying. I don't join in these arguments much but your posts have made me think more about the topic.

 

Wow, someone brought this thread back to life? Why? This thread is meaningless now that the underage stories have been banned.

 

And that's what makes it so funny... They are banned yet they still remain some of the most popular stories on the boards... so raise your glass to contrabanned...

 

Your right about that. I still see them around. All of my stories involve someone under the age of 18. But I don't remember hearing what the cut off age was. Or I missed it. I still see people writing about 11 year olds and that's new stories.

 

I praise the US for Democracy and freedom of speech and believe in it. I DON'T believe in censorship. Willis88 has the only viable answer : Freedom of Speech, freedom to READ what you like AND castrate the bastards who try to rape or molest girls under about 12. Twelve is the age of consent in some countries.

 

Yeah still no line in the sand

 

No, but a know that some stories have been deleted from the stories site because they got one of mine.
The fucked up thing is that it was the only one that I know of that was stolen, and posted on other sites.
Call in the irony police!

 

You know, Eric, that got me to thinking. I had originally planned to have some of the chapters of 2 of the books I have posted on XN taken down because one of those books has went to print and the other is going to print later in the year. However, because I have had my stories and chapters of these books stolen off of XN and posted elsewhere, I decided against asking for anything to be removed from this site because I need the timestamp that appears on them to prove that I am the original author of the stories. Since XN gets farmed on a regular basis, any stories that get taken down from here that were not posted by the original author on another site at the same time or before the story got posted to XN will be losing some, if not all of, their evidence that they are the orignal author of the work by being able to point to the timestamp on the story posted on XN.

I have only ever posted to XN, which makes it very easy to discover when my work has been plagiarized. And while I do not write anything that is currently being censored with the new rules, due to XN being farmed on a regular basis, I am actually a bit wary of posting anything new on this site. And for those authors who have had their works removed and have not posted them any where else on the web, if those same stories have been plagiarized on other websites, once the timestamp is gone from XN then they have lost their online proof to being the author of the stories. Between the stories being removed and the farming that goes on of erotic websites, I wouldn't be surprised if more authors decide to not post their stories online any more due to the immense acts of plagiarism that is going on across the web.

Edit Note: I know this is going to be brought up, so I will go ahead and address it here. While I know that a timestamp is not ultimate proof for ownership of a story, when it comes to proving who posted it first online, the timestamp is the only thing that the posting author has to use for proof aside from sending in a copy of the copyright registration information. After all, if someone tried to say that they were the original author of "Now That's Fucking Hardcore!" they would have to be able to show where THEY posted the story on another website before I posted mine on XN, which means that if my posting has the earliest known timestamp, obviously all other postings were copies made from that original posting.

 

I still have the original rough draft written in pen, (Yes, people still do that.) and that along with what I feel is my pretty distinctive writting style should help me if it comes to that, and it just might.

 

Eric - As I have said previously on this forum what I do to try and protect the integrity of what I write is to burn a copy to a CD before I post my original work to xnxx. This gives me hard evidence of ownership. So far I haven't had to use it, but there is one site that has lifted entire chapters of my continuing series Full Circle. Had they bothered to ask it's probable that I would have given them my OK to re-post them, but to do so without my permission just really pisses me off. -- THX

Fix'm

 

As 4 middle aged females writing under the AmandaP name, we, see no problem writing or reading stories involving under aged as long as the work is identified properly as fiction. We've read many of the works on the Web Site that were identified as real (actually happened) and would bet that by far the greater majority are in reality the work of someone's imagination.

We read the results of some studies some years ago (probably 7 or 8 years), and the study proposed that the number of people reading pedophilia who actually acted the stories out in reality was a very small percentage, only 2 to 3 percent. The study also noted that most who did were already involved with young people, both in and out of family before they began reading the stories.

[FONT=&quot]Each person is allowed their opinion, but when they try to force it onto what others may read and write, it begins to interfere with the legal rights of others.[/FONT]

 

I've had a story reposted on more than one site, but what really chaps my ass is that a few of them are pay sites which means that somebody is making money off of my writing, and it isn't me.

Hello, thank you.
I have no problem with people thinking that my stuff is sick, or depraved.
They are fully entitled to their opinion, but when they say that nobody should be able to read them, and start calling me a child molester, then they have crossed a line with me from which there is no return.

 

ok but where is the story

 

=============================================
It is here, this is what the fuss is all about.

http://stories.xnxx.com/story/26005/Family_Only



============================================

 

For me, I just can't understand why this is even an issue. No one wants to ban stories of murders (or worse, i.e. snuff) BDSM or bestiality, so why are stories that contain underage sex a problem? It's a story, period. Someone here said these stories are bad because pedophiles read them. Say what? Where are the stats that support that? And even if that were so, what would be the harm? For years now, I've combed the internet, paid attention to TV psychiatrists and psychologists and hundreds of well intentioned do-gooders and not once has any even hinted that such stories abet pedophiles in any way. In fact, the only time I ever heard the issue addressed, it was suggested that such stories might have just the opposite effect. People who are reading this crap are getting their relief with their hand and mind.
I suspect that if any author who writes such stories were to find out that there is a dangerous potential that such stories encourage pedophiles, he/she would cease posting immediately and request all stories already posted, be taken down. I know I would.
However, if it is indeed just a story, and it's not your cup of tea, pass on it. Simple.
I would suggest that the brightest and best of the psychiatric community be the ones that figure out if smut is harmful, so that responsible people can act responsibly. If anyone knows of such a study and can point to it, I'd be gratefully obliged if they could post that information here or PM me.

 

The whole idea that stories like that encourage child molestation is just a smokescreen, and a way of painting those that disagree as monsters.
"It's for the safety of the children! You don't hate children, do you?"

The real reason that some people are so vehement about banning them is because they find the subject matter to be gross.
It's really just that simple.
It's like with beastiality.
From a legal standpoint it's about informed consent, or lack thereof, but considering the way we, as a society, treat, and often eat animals, that is obviously bullshit.
No, the real reason there is a law against sucking your dog's dick is that a lot of people just think it's gross.

 

Of course I totally agree. The thing that bothers me the most is that because our society still has a mindset of an age when people were burned at the stak for being witches, we send people to jail, brand them for life, destroy them and their families all in the name of it's for the children.

I think some of your writings mirror mine, and I feel comfortable saying that you undoubtedly care for children much as I do. I don't want to see a one of them harmed and would gladly hang any adult that actually molested one. Still, many of my readers think I'm what I write.

 

I voted for 'God no' but I think there's a third way.
I personally think we, as writers, shouldn't write realistic stories involving minors, I think that just satisfies pedophiles. Therefore I don't write about characters under 10 years, and don't include realistic rape unless the character is 18+. I do write about teens, but always in such way nobody gets hurt or the rapist is an alien or something. To make it so unrealistic everybody can see I'm not serious.

 

Sheesh.

Here we go again.

I guess it's time to revive Replicator. Here you go, folks. A completely unrealistic non-pedo story. Enjoy.