Tea Party’s Image Turns More Negative

Pew Research Center OCTOBER 16, 2013

The Tea Party is less popular than ever, with even many Republicans now viewing the movement negatively. Overall, nearly half of the public (49%) has an unfavorable opinion of the Tea Party, while 30% have a favorable opinion...

Nationwide, 30% now say they have a very unfavorable opinion, up from 24% in June and just 10% in 2010. Meanwhile, the share expressing a very favorable opinion stands at 9% and is little changed over the past three years...

By a 50% to 31% margin, whites now have a more unfavorable than favorable view of the Tea Party.
http://www.people-press.org/2013/10/16/tea-partys-image-turns-more-negative/

 

I'd rather have a pot party...

 

Like I said... Oduma-Kare will make the Tea Party more popular than ever....

This will only help improve their numbers....

You really do have a hard time comprehending what you read huh DL?

 

The Tea Party exists only to be a thorn in your side, they serve no other useful purpose.

Really, do you take them that seriously, that you and the OP devote so much time to them that you ignore what your own party is doing?

 

You did not read my comment with comprehension. I will help you out. According to the Pew Research Center, which is not a left wing blog, the Tea Party is losing support. Now go back and read it again. No one where will notice when your lips move. Just read it slowly and enough times that you understand every syllable.

To help you out a little more, my comment is comment #141.

 

Hey DL... Dig up the same poll, but from March 1, 2014

 

Obama seems to be losing support right now also....
51% disapprove...
43% approve..

 

LOL, you are the one that desperately needs help. Your ignorance is only matched by your arrogance.:laughing:

Those are the only qualities you display here.....

 

WOW!

I really believe Obama could be butt fucking your mom, while eating the popes heart, while reading Mein Kampf, all while he has the Constitution shoved up his ass and you would defend him. You are absolutely comical. You can't believe half the bullshit you spout.

Since you like sources I will use some liberal sources to prove you wrong. We all know 60 minutes is left!

http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/1...azi-is-a-real-scandal-and-youve-been-lied-to/

http://www.dailynews.com/government...histleblower-book-on-fast-and-furious-scandal

Hmmm! I wonder why that is??

 

That's because people are idiots.

[YOUTUBE]DYgAxH2Nadw[/YOUTUBE]

 

Actually, it was because every now and then the voters surprise me by not behaving like idiots.

President Clinton had a consensual affair with a woman past the age of consent who took all of the initiative.

The only reason I am upset that the President lied under oath is that I do not think he should have allowed himself to be caught like that. The question never should have been asked.

My real objection is with Bill's taste. I believe that if the leader of the free world wanted a young and beautiful mistress with whom to relax from the cares of office, that was an indulgence that should have been given him. However, she should have been a beautiful and pencil thin Vassar graduate.

Ideally, she should have been a virgin. Nothing but the best for our Bill.

 

i have to argue against lewinskey as a mistress fit for a president
at least the kennedeys had marylin monroe

 

See, you keep missing the point. At first I thought it was because you are just blinded by your ideology. Then I decided you just like to divert attention from the real issue.

PRESIDENT Clinton was married when he had his "affair" with Monica. He not only pissed on his marriage, but when confronted, looked right into the camera at America and flat LIED to us. His "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" will go down in history as one of the greatest presidential gaffs in history. Right up there with Nixons "I am not a crook."

Then, he lied to Congress. Again.

And as to his "taste" in women? He married Hillary. nuff said.

Pencil thin Vassar virgin indeed. He didn't deserve Monica.

But then, I think you know all that.

 

Just my opinion but if Clinton did not have the power he did and still has he would be on the sex offenders list. Look at what he had to settle for before he had any power.

 

And he murdered 1 person directly and wounded 11 others with a cruise missile strike on the Al-Shifa pharmaceutical factory, solely to divert attention away from his sexual behavior. If he hadn't have acted in haste, against his advisers and the advice of the head of the CIA, the 20 or so thousand people that died in the Sudan because of lack of medication would have lived.

 

Were the Sudanese Making Chemical Weapons?

U.S. foreign policy critics maintain that President Clinton bombed a Sudanese pharmaceutical factory in 1998 without sufficient evidence that it produced chemical weapons...

If the lab results showing EMPTA in the soil are legitimate, there's very little doubt that the Sudanese factory was somehow involved with the production or the shipment of VX.

The lab results weren't obtained using a reliable sampling and analysis protocol, Barletta notes, and he speculates that the results could be a false positive. But it's unclear how the United States could be expected to follow a reliable sampling and analysis protocol using covert operatives in Sudan.

Still, at the very least, U.S. intelligence was shaky, and the Clinton administration may have let the desire for a quick strike supersede the need to finish its homework before taking action.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...ere_the_sudanese_making_chemical_weapons.html

----------

Gallup June 4, 1999

Bill Clinton received the highest job approval ratings of his administration during the Lewinsky/impeachment controversy. As the Lewinsky situation unfolded, Clinton's job approval went up, not down, and his ratings remained high for the duration of the impeachment proceedings...

Bill Clinton's mean job approval rating, 1st quarter 1993 through 1st quarter, 1999 was 53.8
Bill Clinton's mean job approval rating for the five years preceding 1998 was 51.3
Bill Clinton's mean job approval rating in 1998 was 63.8
Bill Clinton's average job approval rating for 1998 was thus 10 points above his overall administration to-date average
Bill Clinton's average job approval rating for 1998 was thus 12.5 points above his administration average for the five years preceding 1998
Bill Clinton's average job approval rating for 1998 was 5.7 points above that of the previous year, 1997, which in turn was higher than that of any of the four years which preceded it
Bill Clinton's job approval rating in the first quarter during which the Lewinsky situation became public knowledge (1st quarter 1998 ) jumped 5.6 points compared to the immediately preceding quarter
http://www.gallup.com/poll/4609/presidential-job-approval-bill-clintons-high-ratings-midst.aspx


There is reason to believe that the Al-Shifa pharmaceutical factory was making chemical weapons. The evidence was inconclusive. If the factory was making chemical weapons, and if President Clinton allowed it to continue to exist, this would have been condemned by Republicans as weakness on the part of President Clinton.

At any rate, the President's approval rating was going up, so he had no reason to deflect attention to an unnecessary attack on an innocent pharmaceutical factory.

 

AND THIS HAS WHAT TO DO WITH THE TEA PARTY??

 

And this is a very good example of why the U.S. is in the shape we are in.

 

The coffee party is there as a sane alternative to the extreme beliefs of the tea party.