Maybe Clarise is Rick?

Relax ROM in the last year I have seen countless PM content floating around and there are at least 3 regular members here who got away with it on a weekly basis even though a mod was contacted.

 

Probably all clarise since the old mod team had a hard on for her and let her get away with several...and the inexplicable fact that when "she" bitches and moans for help.. people show up.

 

You're such a squealer, and I'm not implying that in any form of sexual content.

 

Eye of the beholder.

Maybe they ignored you because you're nuts?

You know what the old hippies used to say, Brandi: "Just because you say I'm paranoid, it doesn't mean there's no one following me."

 

P.s. There was pedo shit yesterday so you ready to accesses now? You know like you said you would in the other thread, see it didn't take long for another pedo to show up what was that only a week went by.

 

Pedo shit where?

I saw nothing.

But that's not what I'm talking about. Listen to yourself, Brandi. You're actually reporting people on the belief that they must have insider information, just because they're onto YOU?

I know most of the people on this place are high, but that doesn't make them deaf blind and stupid.

 

Have you ever seen a volcanic eruption? Island formation?

Just because you didn't see something doesn't mean it didn't happen.

 

But you two see figments of your imagination all the time. That's why the moderators laugh at you and tell you to sit down. So why should I believe either of you about seeing pedo shit? I've never seen anything like that on this site. Heck, I understand this place has a rule about kids appearing in photos and stuff, but with the way some of you zealots examine every pixel with a magnifying glass I honestly don't see the point of moderators. This place for the most part is cleaner than Disney Club Penguin.

 

Pictures of sex with a newborn baby? Where? Not here on GD.

(Full disclosure: I never visit the Pictures/Videos area; porn sort of skeeves me out.)

If someone's posting that sort of picture, the scumbag should be reported to the FBI (wait that's USA) or InterPol or whatever.

 

I didn't see it, but I'm not so petty that I'll deny the claimant just because of who they are. It doesn't surprise me and things have happened in the past.

We don't have any moderators. If you're going to insult me, at least be aware of current events. I also couldn't care less what anybody thinks of me.

This just reeks of desperation, by the way. At least I don't need to make things up; your poor character gives me plenty.

 

No it wasn't pulled for anything of the sort, skank. I pulled it. You need lots of work on the reading comprehension thing.

 

Well if what you say is true it's the same thing as a picture, because as I understand it the sexuality section is autobiographical, so the perve was possibly describing something he really did (i.e. hurting a child).

When I said I don't like porn I meant the pictures and videos. You know. Pornography. Sort of icky and creepy, and besides it's a shame that so much human potential is wasted that way. Of course I feel the same way about whores.

As for why I wrote the deer sex stories? (shrug) people like them, and I write stuff sometimes so I wrote them. I know they're about deer but they're hot right?

 

Awful. Horrible. You would think she would have gotten the message to quit from all the negative comments people posted...in that one story alone.

And one person even gave it a

I guess the poor deer couldn't see the forest for the trees and see that her readers were telling her how horrible it was.

8566 views, 47 replies, and none of then negative.



Hmmm...I wonder what that says about the other writers and their stories.

 

Thanks. I appreciate your candor with regards to the deer stories. They are not my thing at all. Obviously well written though.

So do you not consider written accounts of sex to be pornography then?

Also may I ask why you are questioning my honesty? Acesn8 did the same thing. I dont understand why you would think I would make up something so vile and heinous. There seems to be a culture of denial about content of that type on this forum. In my view a proactive approach would help to stamp it out. Denying it even takes place isn't going to help eradicate it.

For what it's worth in my fairly short time here it was the first time I'd seen any content referring to infants.

 

That's just because most people here are stupid.

 

I'm not questioning your honesty. Others are. I don't even know you. I just phrase my remarks with conditionals, because I'm not familiar with your writing or your ideas at all. (No offense meant.)

I pulled my novels from here in protest to the rule change. They are not porn. They are actually about 21st centry industrialization and the ascendence of meritocracy. But there is sex in them (which I'm told is pretty good), so they had a big audience here.

Can the written word be pornography?

Hmm.

Wrong question. The question should be, does the stifling and muzzling of creative expression confer more benefit to society than harm? See, I'm a free speech/freedom of expression advocate. One should be free to think and write as one pleases. Period.

Whether this forum chooses to host one idea or another is another question. This is a privately owned venue, and to censor speech is the owner's prerogative. They have a right to censor as they wish, and we as writers have the prerogative to remove our work as we see fit. We also have the prerogative to leave in place, should we so choose, trashy sex stories about deer, to press the point that such trash is the best that this place deserves.

Would my books be bannable here under the new rules? I suppose. But so would The Fault in Our Stars, and Bridge to Terabithia, so I suppose it's nothing to be ashamed of. My books are at Barnes & Noble online and Amazon Prime.

Sex with babies.

Another hmm.

I have, on my bookshelf, bound hardcover copies of de Sade's 120 Days of Sodom as well as Juliette, both of which graphically depict sex with babies, as well as infanticide.

I bought them at a mainstream retail bookstore in Harvard Square, Cambridge.

I also have extensive collections of everything else you can imagine.

I love Joseph Conrad. Heart of Darkness uses the word nigger dozens of times. One of Conrad's great novels is entitled, Nigger of the Narcissus.

Shall we censor Heart of Darkness? Shall we rename Nigger of the Narcissus?

Where does it end?

Shall we don brown shirts, assemble all that we find offensive into a great pile, and set a torch to the lot?

 

Yet another tune change from clarise.

With a bonus plug for the books.

 

Sit down and shut up, dweeb. I'm responding to a writer. Know thy place.

 

I think this is so cute. You think you're someone and that you can tell me what to do.
It's like a child throwing a temper tantrum.

 

No. I don't think so.

You're irritated. Or you would not have responded.

Tell me, smart-alek. Have you read Heart of Darkness?


What about The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn?