in the youtube version there is an audible phrase that does hae some sound like coons but it could have also been goons

but so what if he did call the asshole a coon? it was martin that acted as the aggressor when he approached zimmermans vehicle with his hands in his shirt or waistband as if he was holding a weapon

also listen to the call
as soon as the dispatcher stated "we do not need you to do that" zimmerman stopped the persuit
and as for the question of how martin struck zimmerman from behind that is easy he had gone through trees or bushes and lost zimmerman just to come back around to injure and assault him

 

I'm going to save everyone the trouble of doing the research;
1) "Nigras" is violent and stoopid
2) Clinton paid down the deficit
3) Reagan raised it
4) Bush started unnecessary wars
5) Obama is the savior returned
6) It's the Publicans fault that unemployment is so high
7) If unemployment had not been so high, both Martin and Zimmerman would have been employed and not wandering around in the dark
8) Therefore, it's the publicans fault.

Cmon people, let the process play out, then you can scream it's the publicans/Whites/Mexicans/Nigras/CIA fault

 

http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/06/28/2232681/witness-admission-zimmerman/?mobile=nc

Here's another witness that said Trayvon did not attacked Zimmerman

 

Point is there was a confrontation and a guy died. Travon had to do something to cause Zimmerman's injuries. Martin got shot why couldn't he have ran the hell away. He would have survived! In Florida there law states if you feel threatened you can shoot someone im in no means saying this incident is right or wrong. I'm not going to sit here playing Monday morning quarterback.


Stand-your-ground law
"Stand your ground" redirects here. For other uses, see Stand Your Ground (disambiguation).
In the United States of America, stand-your-ground law states that a person may justifiably use force in self-defense when there is reasonable belief of an unlawful threat, without an obligation to retreat first. The concept sometimes exists in statutory law and sometimes through common law precedents. One key distinction is whether the concept only applies to defending a home or vehicle, or whether it applies to all lawfully occupied locations.

Under these legal concepts, a person is justified in using deadly force in certain situations and the "stand your ground" law would be a defense or immunity to criminal charges and civil suit. The difference between immunity and a defense is that an immunity bars suit, charges, detention and arrest. A defense, such as an affirmative defense, permits a plaintiff or the state to seek civil damages or a criminal conviction but may offer mitigating circumstances that justifies the accused's conduct.

More than half of the states in the United States have adopted the Castle doctrine, stating that a person has no duty to retreat when their home is attacked. Some states go a step further, removing the duty of retreat from other locations. "Stand Your Ground", "Line In The Sand" or "No Duty To Retreat" laws thus state that a person has no duty or other requirement to abandon a place in which he has a right to be, or to give up ground to an assailant. Under such laws, there is no duty to retreat from anywhere the defender may legally be.[1] Other restrictions may still exist; such as when in public, a person must be carrying firearms in a legal manner, whether concealed or openly.

"Stand your ground" governs U.S. federal case law in which right of self-defense is asserted against a charge of criminal homicide. The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in Beard v. U.S. (158 U.S. 550 (1895)) that a man who was "on his premises" when he came under attack and "...did not provoke the assault, and had at the time reasonable grounds to believe, and in good faith believed, that the deceased intended to take his life, or do him great bodily harm...was not obliged to retreat, nor to consider whether he could safely retreat, but was entitled to stand his ground."[2][3]

Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. declared in Brown v. United States (1921) (256 U.S. 335, 343 (16 May 1921)), a case that upheld the "no duty to retreat" maxim, that "detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife".[4]

 

George Zimmerman did not only feel threatened. He felt the pain of Trayvon Martin's punches.

 

What do you think? Do you think black ghetto riots will be justified when George Zimmerman is acquired?

What about the fact that blacks have a rate of violent crime that is about eight times the white rate? Do you think whites are responsible for that?

 

So Trayvon deserve to get killed for defending himself? By the way there were blood on his hands. I have a picture of his body, I can show everyone here, that Trayvon did not touch Zimmerman.

 

By the way Zimmerman has run into trouble with the law before.

 

Obviously trayvon had to do something to cause Zimmerman's injuries. right?

 

Obviously Zimmerman is liar, and those things to himself. I highly doubt someone of Trayvon size, strength, and statue can do so little damage. Especially if Zimmerman head was bashed against concrete. Do you think his injuries would be more drastic?

 

I seen Ppl in some every ruff fights with smaller bigger Ppl and had same or less injuries. Hell I know two guys who got hit by the same car twice with scratches. I wasn't there all I know is both had injuries and one is dead. Why couldn't trayvon run the hell away?

 

and with this you positively, 100% show that you are just trolling. Thanks for playing.

 

He did not run away because he was too much of a black ghetto thug. He was too gansta. He felt that he had been dissed.

 

Defending himself against what? Being followed? That is not a crime.

 

​

 

Why do I hear Al Sharpton's voice whenever I read one of VV's posts?

 

If black ghetto riots follow the acquittal of George Zimmerman I think professional race hustlers like Al Sharpton will find it more difficult to raise money. Fewer white liberals will suffer the white liberal guilt complex. More white liberals will acknowledge that blacks have failed to live up to the hopes white liberals had for them during the civil rights movement.

 

Facts

You need to get caught up on some facts. George Zimmerman was on the bottom, nose broke with the back of his head lacerated. George Zimmerman was on his way back to his truck when Trayvon confronted him. He ended up on top of George slamming his head into the sidewalk. George Zimmerman shot from the bottom killing Marten. George Zimmerman was well within Floridas stand your ground law.

George Zimmerman is on trial to keep those niggers from burning and looting that town.

 

Burn in hell, asscunt. And take your fellow twat Klan members with you.

 

By the way pecker-wood, are you fucking one of the moderators on this site or something? Cause I have notice that you said the N-word many times on here, but yet you have yet to be called a racist or get banned? Answer honestly,now