Donald J. Trump; Liar In Chief

conroe4 · May 30, 2020

Biden doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell.

Dearelliot · May 30, 2020

If

Distant Lover · May 30, 2020

conroe4 · May 30, 2020

Dearelliot said: ↑

If
Click to expand...

Even if hell freezes over.

Trev1 · May 30, 2020

In a democracy is it the place of the media to help or hinder any candidate's election or reelection bid?

Now, many media have some degree of bias, particularly in who they choose to publish in opinion pieces. These are clearly marked opinion. But the news should be reported as the news. And there are as many right-leaning outlets as left.

shootersa · May 31, 2020

News media's job is to report the news based on facts, without slanting it.

American news media fails, miserably.

gammaXray · Jun 5, 2020

stumbler · Jun 9, 2020

Barr Contradicts Trump’s Claim About ‘Inspecting’ White House Bunker

Attorney General Bill Barr on Monday contradicted President Donald Trump’s claim that he went into the White House bunker purely to do an inspection while protests were happening outside.

“We were reacting to three days of extremely violent demonstrations right across from the White House,” Barr said on Fox News. “A lot of injuries to police officers, arson. Things were so bad that the Secret Service recommended the president go down to the bunker. We can’t have that in our country.”

Trump said last week that he only went down to “inspect” the bunker and that he had done so several times before. The president reportedly spent an hour in the bunker during last week’s protests, which is reserved for emergencies.
Click to expand...

https://www.thedailybeast.com/christopher-frierson-films-police-pepper-spraying-his-face?ref=home

stumbler · Jun 18, 2020

The delusional rantings of a mad king dictator.

Trump falsely claims COVID-19 is ‘dying out’ in Oklahoma — as cases ‘soar far above anything the state has seen so far’

President Donald Trump told a Washington Post reporter Wednesday that he’s not worried about the coronavirus anymore because it’s “dying out.”

In a video posted by JM Rieger, Trump reveals that he believes that the numbers in Oklahoma, where he intends to hold a rally Saturday, are falling.

“If you look, the numbers are very minuscule compared to what it was,” Trump claimed.

It’s factually inaccurate, as Oklahoma’s COVID-19 cases have a record spike in just 24 hours.

“State health officials said 259 more Oklahomans have tested positive for COVID-19 as Oklahoma’s case totals soar far above anything the state has seen so far,” said KOCO about the last 24 hours in the state. “The good news is hospitalizations and death rates still remain low.”

Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt, a Republican, said that it’s a free society and people are free to stay home and not attend the rally. He does not account for whether those people who do attend the rally will then spread the virus to others they come in contact with.

Some have started mocking the rally with their own memes.
Click to expand...

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/tr...far-above-anything-the-state-has-seen-so-far/

stumbler · Jun 23, 2020

A history of government agencies twisting the truth to align with Trump misinformation

It has become a familiar pattern: President Donald Trump says something that doesn’t line up with the facts held by scientists and other experts at government agencies. Then, instead of pushing back, federal officials scramble to reconcile the fiction with their own public statements.

It happened in March, when Trump pushed his opinion that antimalarial drugs could treat COVID-19. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued an unusual directive that lent credence to the president’s perspective: “Although optimal dosing and duration of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 are unknown, some U.S. clinicians have reported anecdotally” on specific dosages that the CDC then lists. The CDC’s language — which the agency later retracted — shocked experts, who said the drug needed to be treated with caution. The CDC told Reuters the agency had prepared the guidance at the behest of the White House.

Perhaps the best known example of an agency twisting itself into a pretzel stems from “Sharpiegate.” After the National Weather Service’s Birmingham, Alabama, office contradicted Trump’s Sharpie fable that Hurricane Dorian threatened the state, the agency overseeing the office put out a statement backing the president over the scientists. Emails obtained by BuzzFeed and The Washington Post showed just how the episode roiled the agency. “You have no idea how hard I’m fighting to keep politics out of science,” one official wrote. Another email simply had one word: “HELP!!!”

On the same day last week, two separate agencies cut through the White House influence with their own factual conclusions.

The Food and Drug Administration announced last Monday that it was revoking emergency approval of the malaria drugs, saying that the dosing regimens promoted are “unlikely to produce an antiviral effect” and that their risks — which include potentially fatal cardiac side effects — outweigh the possible benefits.

Also that day, an independent panel investigating Sharpiegate on behalf of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration found that top officials — including acting chief Neil Jacobs — violated the policy that forbids political interference with NOAA’s scientific findings. Meanwhile, Trump nominated Jacobs to permanently lead the agency in December.

ProPublica catalogued other instances in which government entities have changed language or made other moves buttressing the White House’s unsupported assertions.

“Our Stockpile”
The morning after Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner asserted that the national stockpile is “our stockpile” and not for states, the government changed the wording on the stockpile’s website.

Before Kushner’s comments, it said the “stockpile ensures that the right medicines and supplies get to those who need them most.”

That became: The stockpile’s “role is to supplement state and local supplies,” and “many states have products stockpiled, as well.”

A government spokesman said the update had been in the works for a week before Kushner’s comments. The spokesperson did not allow their name to be used.

“No Proof of Anything”
In another instance, after Trump warned in a tweet of “unknown Middle Easterners” crossing the border from Mexico — a “National Emergy [sic]” — the Department of Homeland Security released figures to support the claim. Upon inspection, it became clear the figures did nothing of the sort.

A few days later, the president backed off his claim of suspicious Middle Easterners crossing the border. “There’s no proof of anything,” Trump said, “but there could very well be.”

Agencies’ attempts to bolster the White House haven’t always borne fruit. In late 2018, Trump again warned about dangers at the Mexican border. “Women are tied up, they’re bound, duct tape put around their faces, around their mouths, in many cases they can’t even breathe,” Trump said. “They’re put in the backs of cars or vans or trucks.”

It wasn’t at all clear what Trump was referring to, but a top Border Patrol official tried to be of assistance. He emailed agents asking them to pass along any such evidence. (The email was obtained by a Vox reporter, Dara Lind, who’s now at ProPublica.)

The Border Patrol never followed up with examples.

The Inaugural Example
And then there was Trump’s first day in office. He publicly complained about what he said were misleading photographs comparing the size of the audience at his inauguration with President Barack Obama’s, and then-White House Spokesman Sean Spicer falsely claimed a record crowd size.

The Post soon reported the president called the head of the National Park Service to demand it release photos that would counter what he saw as the misleading comparisons. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the deputy spokesperson, said the call was simply a reflection of a president who is “so accessible, and constantly in touch.”

A government investigation later found that after the call a National Park Service photographer cropped photos to take out empty areas. As the report noted, “He selected a number of photos, based on his professional judgment, that concentrated on the area of the national mall where most of the crowd was standing.”

The report noted that no one ordered him to do so.

The 10% Tax Cut for the Middle Class
Congress has also gotten involved. Right before the 2018 elections, Trump made unplanned comments that middle-class Americans would be getting a 10% tax cut. “We’ll be putting it in next week,” Trump said at a campaign rally in Houston. Nobody in the White House or Capitol Hill had even heard Trump talk about it before.

Republicans responded by saying they were working on rolling out something — reportedly a nonbinding resolution — “over the coming weeks,” as one congressman put it.

The cuts never happened.
Click to expand...

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/a-...the-truth-to-align-with-trump-misinformation/

stumbler · Jun 28, 2020

I think this might actually be the most sickening, disgusting, and outrageous lie Trump has told yet. My God he is lying about the deaths of American troops.

Trump rages at Russian bounty on US soldiers reports with claim there ‘have not been many attacks on us’

Donald Trump broke his silence on Sunday morning at reports that he has been aware that Russia has been paying a bounty for the killing of American soldiers in Afghanistan, calling it fake news even though it has been confirmed by multiple news outlets including Fox News.

Taking to Twitter, the president wrote,”Nobody briefed or told me, @VP Pence, or Chief of Staff @MarkMeadows about the so-called attacks on our troops in Afghanistan by Russians, as reported through an ‘anonymous source’ by the Fake News @nytimes. Everybody is denying it & *there have not been many attacks on us,” before adding, “Nobody’s been tougher on Russia than the Trump Administration. With Corrupt Joe Biden & Obama, Russia had a field day, taking over important parts of Ukraine – Where’s Hunter? Probably just another phony Times hit job, just like their failed Russia Hoax. Who is their ‘source’?”

It should be noted that Mark Meadows was not White House chief of staff at the time when it was reported the president was briefed on the intelligence.

You can see the tweets below:
Click to expand...

*Just fucking sickening. We lost 20 troops in Afghanistan in 2019 and Trump says that's not many attacks. How many would be "many." 200 .... 2000? How many dead troops does Trump have to wipe his ass on before he would show the slightest concern?

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/tr...claim-there-have-not-been-many-attacks-on-us/

thinskin · Jun 28, 2020

stumbler said: ↑

I think this might actually be the most sickening, disgusting, and outrageous lie Trump has told yet. My God he is lying about the deaths of American troops.

Trump rages at Russian bounty on US soldiers reports with claim there ‘have not been many attacks on us’

*Just fucking sickening. We lost 20 troops in Afghanistan in 2019 and Trump says that's not many attacks. How many would be "many." 200 .... 2000? How many dead troops does Trump have to wipe his ass on before he would show the slightest concern?

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/06/tr...claim-there-have-not-been-many-attacks-on-us/
Click to expand...

Well apparently 125000 deaths is everything under control!

Thinskin

shootersa · Jun 28, 2020

You two just can't help but spew lies and propaganda about President Trump, can you??

First, those 20 deaths have not been attributed to Russian bounties and are the fewest American deaths in Afghanistan in years. But then, you could no more give Trump credit for that than fuck yourselves.

Second, not a single one of those 125,000 Covid deaths can be pinned on Trump, anymore than the 500,000 deaths worldwide.

Motherfuckers just blatantly and continuously lie cause ..... trump.

stumbler · Jun 29, 2020

shootersa said: ↑

You two just can't help but spew lies and propaganda about President Trump, can you??

First, those 20 deaths have not been attributed to Russian bounties and are the fewest American deaths in Afghanistan in years. But then, you could no more give Trump credit for that than fuck yourselves.

Second, not a single one of those 125,000 Covid deaths can be pinned on Trump, anymore than the 500,000 deaths worldwide.

Motherfuckers just blatantly and continuously lie cause ..... trump.
Click to expand...

Ok @shootersa you tell us how many dead US troops is "many"? Is it 2, 20, 200, 2000? Tell us you great revolutionary super patriot you. How many dead troops should it take to spark Trump's concern.

And if Putin is paying bounties on US soldiers what do you say Trump should do about that?

Tell us great revolutionary patriot.

And everyone take note of what a disgusting non-fucking liar @shootersa really is. The 20 US troops killed in Afghanistan last year were the most killed since 2015. But we can count on the great patriot @shootersa to even lie about deaths of our troops. Because Trump.

shootersa · Jun 29, 2020

Ok motherfucker, shooter will play your troll game
1) how many dead US troops is "many?" Any deaths is "many"
2) how many dead troops spark Trumps concern? Shooter doesn't know, but he'd guess any deaths would concern Trump.
3) if Putin has put a bounty on our troops, and Shooter was president, Shooter would call Putin out in a most public way and find a way to send in those pissed off 19 year old marines to make sure Putin (and the rest of the world) would understand the very severe consequences.

Now, motherfucker, Shooters turn
1) our fallen military overseas, who have not been recovered: what price would be your limit to bring them home?
2) what price would you pay Trump if he'd stick his dick up your ass?
3) what level are you prepared to sink to to get Trump?

shootersa · Jun 29, 2020

Oh, and those deaths in Afghanistan? Not all are or were combat deaths, which is what the discussion was about.
In any case, here are the total military deaths in afghanistanfrom 2001 through March, 2020.

Year J F M A M J J A S O N D Total
2001 – – – – – – – – – 2 2 3 7
2002 10 1 9 4 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 30
2003 4 1 8 2 1 2 1 4 1 3 6 0 33
2004 9 2 3 1 8 4 2 3 4 5 7 1 49
2005 2 1 5 18 4 26 2 15 11 4 2 3 93
2006 1 7 7 1 11 18 9 10 6 10 7 1 88
2007 0 12 3 8 11 12 13 18 8 9 11 6 111
2008 7 1 7 5 16 28 20 22 27 16 1 3 153
2009 14 15 13 6 12 24 44 51 37 59 17 18 310
2010 30 31 24 19 34 60 65 55 42 60 53 33 496
2011 24 18 29 46 35 47 37 70 42 31 18 15 412
2012 26 10 18 34 39 29 41 39 19 17 16 13 301
2013 3 1 15 13 19 17 11 11 8 9 3 10 120
2014 7 6 0 4 4 13 3 5 5 2 3 3 54
2015 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 3 1 8 0 6 22
2016 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 4 1 14
2017 0 0 1 3 0 3 1 3 2 1 2 1 17
2018 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 2 1 5 2 15
2019 2 0 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 0 2 1 22
2020 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

stumbler · Jun 29, 2020

shootersa said: ↑

Ok motherfucker, shooter will play your troll game
1) how many dead US troops is "many?" Any deaths is "many"
Click to expand...

So was Trump telling the truth when he said there weren't "many" attacks on our troops in Afghanistan?

shootersa said:

2) how many dead troops spark Trumps concern? Shooter doesn't know, but he'd guess any deaths would concern Trump.
Click to expand...

Did Trump show concern for the 20 US troops killed in Afghanistan last year. Or did he just day there weren't many?

shootersa said:

3) if Putin has put a bounty on our troops, and Shooter was president, Shooter would call Putin out in a most public way and find a way to send in those pissed off 19 year old marines to make sure Putin (and the rest of the world) would understand the very severe consequences.
Click to expand...

Will you continue to support Trump if he does not do any of those things?

shootersa said:

Now, motherfucker, Shooters turn
1) our fallen military overseas, who have not been recovered: what price would be your limit to bring them home?
Click to expand...

You mean like Normandy? Should we bring them home? How about Iwo Jima and all the other Pacific Islands where our Troops are buried in unmarked mass graves?

I would not bring them home. We have tens of thousands of troops buried and lost over seas. Tens of thousands from World War I, World War II, Korea and Vietnam. Nobody is even trying to look for them let alone bring them home. And to show just what a phony emotionally based argument you are making here what about US troop lost at sea? Anyone trying to bring them home? Or they don't count?

And just to show what a disgusting pull your heart strings support Trump at all costs hysterical use our troops for props you are trying to make here this whole thing revolves around our fallen troops in North Korea. We still have more than 5,000 troops missing in South Korea and no one is looking for them because it wouldn't make a good Trump photo-op.

shootersa said:

2) what price would you pay Trump if he'd stick his dick up your ass?
3) what level are you prepared to sink to to get Trump?
Click to expand...

None. I have no sexual attraction to Trump whatsoever. I just know he is the worst, most corrupt and mentally ill president in US history and you are the one sucking his dick. Because Trump.

Trump is your Chosen One and can do no wrong.

shootersa said: ↑

Oh, and those deaths in Afghanistan? Not all are or were combat deaths, which is what the discussion was about.
In any case, here are the total military deaths in afghanistanfrom 2001 through March, 2020.

Year J F M A M J J A S O N D Total
2001 – – – – – – – – – 2 2 3 7
2002 10 1 9 4 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 30
2003 4 1 8 2 1 2 1 4 1 3 6 0 33
2004 9 2 3 1 8 4 2 3 4 5 7 1 49
2005 2 1 5 18 4 26 2 15 11 4 2 3 93
2006 1 7 7 1 11 18 9 10 6 10 7 1 88
2007 0 12 3 8 11 12 13 18 8 9 11 6 111
2008 7 1 7 5 16 28 20 22 27 16 1 3 153
2009 14 15 13 6 12 24 44 51 37 59 17 18 310
2010 30 31 24 19 34 60 65 55 42 60 53 33 496
2011 24 18 29 46 35 47 37 70 42 31 18 15 412
2012 26 10 18 34 39 29 41 39 19 17 16 13 301
2013 3 1 15 13 19 17 11 11 8 9 3 10 120
2014 7 6 0 4 4 13 3 5 5 2 3 3 54
2015 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 3 1 8 0 6 22
2016 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 4 1 14
2017 0 0 1 3 0 3 1 3 2 1 2 1 17
2018 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 2 1 5 2 15
2019 2 0 2 3 2 2 3 3 2 0 2 1 22
2020 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Click to expand...

And here again. First you tell just a disgusting lie to try and defend Trump and are perfectly willing to use our troops living and dead for props in your pro-Trump political agenda which is the the literal definition of despicable.

Just non-fuck you you disgusting fraudulent lying political hack.

Intelligence suggests Russian bounties led to deaths of several US troops in Afghanistan: report

Russian bounties on coalition forces in Afghanistan are thought to have resulted in the deaths of several U.S. service members, according to intelligence findings reported on by The Washington Post on Sunday.

Evidence obtained during interrogations of enemy combatants linked the recently reported program — which Russia has denied ever existed — to multiple incidents in which U.S. forces were killed, the Post reported. It was unclear how many service members were targeted or how many deaths were specifically linked to the alleged Russian policy.

A spokesperson for the National Security Council told the Post that "the veracity of the underlying allegations continue to be evaluated." The White House has claimed that President Trump was never briefed on the program's existence. The information did lead to a high-level meeting in the White House over how to respond after it was confirmed by the CIA, the Post reported Sunday.

"Nobody briefed or told me, @VP Pence, or Chief of Staff @MarkMeadows about the so-called attacks on our troops in Afghanistan by Russians, as reported through an 'anonymous source' by the Fake News @nytimes. Everybody is denying it & there have not been many attacks on us," Trump tweeted.

One person familiar with the intelligence defended the idea that Trump had not been briefed in an interview with the Post, citing a lack of options determined by the National Security Council.

"I don’t think that anybody withheld anything and screwed up by not getting to the president on time.” the official said, adding that until “you were absolutely sure of the intelligence and the NSC had drawn up policy options, you weren’t going to walk into the Oval Office."

Between 15 and 30 U.S. service members have died every year in Afghanistan since 2015, while eight have been killed so far in 2020, according to iCasualties.org. In February, the Trump administration and the Taliban signed an agreement mandating the withdrawal of about 3,400 troops from the country, while around 8,600 will remain in the country to continue anti-terrorism efforts. In exchange, the Taliban agreed to not allow attacks against U.S. forces to be based in Afghanistan.
Click to expand...

https://thehill.com/policy/national...-russian-bounties-led-to-deaths-of-several-us

shootersa · Jun 29, 2020

stumbler said: ↑

So was Trump telling the truth when he said there weren't "many" attacks on our troops in Afghanistan?

Well, Shooter doesn't know, but what we now know is you happily push the lie that Trump has known about bounties for months.

Did Trump show concern for the 20 US troops killed in Afghanistan last year. Or did he just day there weren't many?

Shooter believes Trump cares about those lives one hell of a lot more than you, the NYT or.despicables do.

Will you continue to support Trump if he does not do any of those things?

Given the alternative, yes. If despicables had tried a little harder they could have had a better option than Trump. What are they offering? Biden.
Jesus

You mean like Normandy? Should we bring them home? How about Iwo Jima and all the other Pacific Islands where our Troops are buried in unmarked mass graves?

I would not bring them home. We have tens of thousands of troops buried and lost over seas. Tens of thousands from World War I, World War II, Korea and Vietnam. Nobody is even trying to look for them let alone bring them home. And to show just what a phony emotionally based argument you are making here what about US troop lost at sea? Anyone trying to bring them home? Or they don't count?

And just to show what a disgusting pull your heart strings support Trump at all costs hysterical use our troops for props you are trying to make here this whole thing revolves around our fallen troops in North Korea. We still have more than 5,000 troops missing in South Korea and no one is looking for them because it wouldn't make a good Trump photo-op.

Now see how you defer motherfucker? You know we're talking about our military MIA who are not entombed with full honors in US cemeteries overseas.

And, cause you don't know this, Shooter will educate you; families decide if their loved ones are brought home or buried with honors overseas. Those are not unmarked mass graves. That part you do fucking know.
Asshole.

And our dead buried at sea? You know goddam well that the tradition was born of necessity, you know, before embalming and refrigeration. Shooter believes sailors who die at sea now are brought home.

As for the MIA of any war, we still, to this day, work at bringing them home. All of them. Its part of the deal made with our service members.

A part of the deal you'd break cause it might give Trump a photo op.

So, don't ever pull your fake patriotism around here because Shooter will remind everyone everytime about your old bones bullshit.

None. I have no sexual attraction to Trump whatsoever. I just know he is the worst, most corrupt and mentally ill president in US history and you are the one sucking his dick. Because Trump.

Well, tell you what, motherfucker, more than anyone around here, you are very much obsessed with Trump's dick and where he's putting it, so you can see where it sure looks like your endless anger, lies, and attacks on Trump are more jealous jilted lover than political pundit.

Trump is your Chosen One and can do no wrong.

And as usual, you end your spew with yet another fucking lie.

And here again. First you tell just a disgusting lie to try and defend Trump and are perfectly willing to use our troops living and dead for props in your pro-Trump political agenda which is the the literal definition of despicable.

Just non-fuck you you disgusting fraudulent lying political hack.

Intelligence suggests Russian bounties led to deaths of several US troops in Afghanistan: report

https://thehill.com/policy/national...-russian-bounties-led-to-deaths-of-several-us
Click to expand...

stumbler · Jun 29, 2020

I have told you before @shootersa. I will not even address one of these posts because its just part of your total fraud. You know how to quote. You know the format. And this is just another one of your phony lying frauds.

Keep using our troops deaths to suck Trumps dick.

shootersa · Jun 29, 2020

Oh,.and the rest of your spew.is dismissed.

Log in or Sign up

conroe4 Lake Lover In XNXX Heaven

Dearelliot Porn Star

Distant Lover Master of Facts

conroe4 Lake Lover In XNXX Heaven

Trev1 Porn Star

shootersa Frisky Feline

gammaXray Porn Star

stumbler Porn Star

stumbler Porn Star

stumbler Porn Star

stumbler Porn Star

thinskin Porn Star Banned!

shootersa Frisky Feline

stumbler Porn Star

shootersa Frisky Feline

shootersa Frisky Feline

stumbler Porn Star

shootersa Frisky Feline

stumbler Porn Star

shootersa Frisky Feline

Donald J. Trump; Liar In Chief

Log in or Sign up

conroe4 Lake Lover In XNXX Heaven

Dearelliot Porn Star

Distant Lover Master of Facts

conroe4 Lake Lover In XNXX Heaven

Trev1 Porn Star

shootersa Frisky Feline

gammaXray Porn Star

stumbler Porn Star

stumbler Porn Star

stumbler Porn Star

stumbler Porn Star

thinskin Porn Star Banned!

shootersa Frisky Feline

stumbler Porn Star

shootersa Frisky Feline

shootersa Frisky Feline

stumbler Porn Star

shootersa Frisky Feline

stumbler Porn Star

shootersa Frisky Feline

Useful Searches