Yes, it will, on Friday, Jan. 20, 2017. I imagine the sales of Prilosec to sections of the American population will soar; I'd buy shares now was I you.

 

Majority think Hillary Clinton should have been charged

WASHINGTON, Dc (CNN) —A majority of Americans say they disagree with the FBI's decision not to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, according to a new poll.

A Washington Post/ABC News poll, released Monday, found that 56% of American adults disapprove of the FBI's decision, while 35% said they approved. But a majority -- 58% -- also said the issue would not affect their vote in the 2016 presidential election.

Opinions on the FBI's decision were sharply divided along partisan lines. According to the poll, nearly 90% of Republicans said Clinton should have been charged, while only about 30% of Democrats said the same.

 

With the Clinton haters the hate came first. The excuses came later. Hatred of Bill was lingering fallout from the War in Vietnam. During the 1990's millions of white men were angry that the United States had lost the war in Vietnam, and that many who protested against the war were doing well in life.

Hatred of Hillary is connected to that, and to the fact that she is a woman.

During the first Clinton administration I would sometimes ask a Clinton hater why he hated the President. He would go through the usually litany: travelgate, filegate, Vince Foster. Etc., etc, growl, growl, growl.

Eventually it came down to, "He expressed contempt for the military!"

 

Distant lover said... With the Clintons, the hate came first.

So, what are you saying.... that people started hating Bill Clinton before he showed us what a lying, corrupt and greedy bastard he was?.... Interesting logic.

I did not blame Bill for Vietnam. I voted for Ross Perot because I thought a business man with a proven record of success would make a good president. I didn't start disliking Clinton until I looked at Whitewater and all the other scandals that popped up about him. Paula Johns etc... However Monica was the straw. I started to see a pattern of bad behavior and that pattern has continued with NAFT and all the crooks he pardoned at the end of his term. Two old expressions came to mind. "Birds of feather...". and "Where there is smoke..... "

Bill and Hillary Clinton have become poster children for Political corruption and greed. Bottom line is that I don't trust them and I think Hillary as president would be a worst mistake then Obama. Voting for her because she is a woman would be just as stupid as the people that voted for Obama because he was black and it was time we had a black president.

No, I think it's time we had a president that knows how to get things done. Yes, I expect the politicians will give Trump a hard time but with the support of the people he'll push hard to get it done... and it he can't get it done, he'll tell us why and what we the people have to do to gets our agenda through. open the doors.

I'm not patrician and I don't support one party over another. I think they are both corrupt but putting into a leadership role someone we already know can't be trusted would be the height of stupidly. We have real problems that impact our country and they need a solution now... I'm talking about illegal immigration, Moslem invasion, jobs leaving the country, bad trade deals, bankers and Well Street running our country, National debt, urban crime, race relations, foreign influence directing our country's policies, globalization and a general distrust of government that is shared by most Americans, .... just to name a few. How can we possibly fix any of that with a person at the helm most people believe is a lying, greedy, inept and corrupt Politician.

Yes I know that Donald Trump is a little rough around the edges, he is not a PC Politician and has no experience being part of the Establishment... but that's what people like about him. He represents a chance for real change. Hillary Clinton will just be more of the same BS that we are sick and tired of.

 

On a number of occasions I have quoted Politifact in order to demonstrate that Hillary Clinton is quite a bit more honest than Donald Trump.

--------

Donald Trump's file

• 
  
  
  • True4 (2%)(4)
  • Mostly True14 (8%)(14)
  • Half True25 (14%)(25)
  • Mostly False30 (17%)(30)
  • False71 (40%)(71)

Pants on Fire34 (19%)


Hillary Clinton's file

• 
  
  
  • True52 (23%)(52)
  • Mostly True62 (28%)(62)
  • Half True47 (21%)(47)
  • Mostly False33 (15%)(33)
  • False25 (11%)(25)
  • Pants on Fire3 (1%)

----------

Trump's two most famous campaign promises are so unrealistic that he is either terribly dishonest, or terribly delusional. I am not sure which of these characteristics is worse for a president of the United States. He has promised to make Mexico pay for a wall to keep illegal immigrants out of the United States. He has promised to pay off the national debt in eight years while cutting income taxes for people in every tax bracket, and while not making any cuts to Social Security and Medicare.

Hatred of the Clinton's can only be understood psychologically. They are not evil. Their politics are not extreme.

 

Paying the wall is real easy......

we lose 58 billion to them each year in trade.....

straighten out 20% of that and mexico paid for it.....

Mexico changes its tune on Trump

Mexican officials are focusing on the positives in the U.S.-Mexico relationship, avoiding direct references to the presidential campaign.

In an interview with The Hill Monday, Secretary of the Economy Ildefonso Guajardo said "it's not very convenient for foreign officials" to comment on U.S. elections. He said they will instead focus on the massive economic potential of the U.S.-Mexico partnership.

"The mere fact that Mexico has become an item in the debate should be an opportunity to reinforce the U.S-Mexico relationship. In a way, underlying that reality is the fact that whatever happens in Mexico has an impact in the U.S. That in itself is good," said Guajardo.

========================================

How immigrants in America are sending $120 BILLION to their struggling families back home
Migrants working in the United States sent a staggering $120 billion back to their families last year, it was revealed today.

The amount of money being sent by migrants across the entire world reached $530 billion last year, making it a larger economy than Iran or Argentina, the data from the World Bank showed.

This worldwide figure has tripled in the last ten years and is now three times bigger than the total aid budgets given by countries around the world. It has sparked debate whether this so-called remittance money could be a viable alternative to relying on help from other governments.

In the United States last year, more than $120 billion was sent by workers to families abroad - making it the largest sender of remittances in the world. More than $23 billion went to Mexico, $13.45 billion to China, $10.84 billion to India and $10 billion to the Philippines, among other recipients.

 

You don't say.

 

Hello...... He works for Obamanation, what other decision do you think he would make. One Democrap protecting another.

 

What I'd like to know is why the FBI investors in the case were told to sign a nondisclosure document. Something they are not normally ask/told to do. There are a lot of rotten eggs in Denmark.
What did billiary and the attorney general really talk about in their so call accidental meeting?

 

President Bush says, "Hello, hello, hello... Damn, these secure lines never work. I'm going start using a blackberry on my personal server like Hillary does."

 

Did you know...that here in the U.S. a cop(Comey), doesn't tell a Lawyer(Lynch) how to do their job?

What the fuck was I thinking...of course you knew....just wondering why Comey didn't.

 

Hard for me to understand with all the talk about Clintons and Obama and their criminal activities, and why after almost two years of control of both house and senate and their very own special hand picked Attorney General, who didn't recluse himself from that area, Why hasn't Trump managed to indict one person associated with the two, much less the two worse criminals in American History Clinton and Obama,. He hasn't even gotten as far as managing to find anyone to look into their criminal activities. I mean after almost two years is it possible there isn't a shred of evidence...What possible excuse could the man have since he has raved on and on non stop about how terrible these people are and they should be in Jail...I honestly ask does anyone maybe think Trump is constantly raving about the two of them, for some other unknown reason? I think if the Democrats had had both houses and Presidency The Republicans would have been screaming their lungs out about why these two were not under indictment! BTW interesting Vegas odds are Kushner indicted before Hillary!

 

How do we lose anything to them in trade? Do they charge high tariffs on imported goods from the United States? I doubt it.

Mexicans who are here legally have the right to send money they earn legally to relatives and friends in Mexico.

So again I say, Trump either lied about Mexico paying for the wall, or he was delusional. Right now he wants to make the tax payers pay for the wall, even though he cut taxes for rich people and corporations.

 

Hillary will not be indicted. She has been investigated and investigated. They have found nothing to indict. The notion that Hillary is some kind of hardened criminal is a delusion of the Clinton haters.

 

''republicans insist they can increase military spending while also cutting taxes for the rich''

 

''''in the 50's taxes were at 92%''

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/hillary-clinton-maintains-2016-election-160716779.html

And still, four years after she lost, she's revealing just how butt hurt she is/was.