Mr Smith has often commented that you cannot take anything liberals say seriously because they don't even believe what they profess to believe. Just like all the liberal Hollywood actors and actresses, singers, groups, etc. not one liberal here has condemned the behavior of Harvey Weinstein. Hillary Clinton and Elizabeth Warren's silence is shocking to say the least. Eventually I believe they will have to condemn his despicable actions.

The bottom line here is our liberal friends are all the biggest hypocrites imaginable.

 

There is already an existing thread that you have no respect to post in Mr Hypocrite ...

Even I respect others that have threads unlike you and RK. IF I do start one that may have been around it is because they don't maintain it like I can and do like my sports threads.

Just thought I would add that to save you the trouble of trying to defend your actions.

 

Or you know, lots of "liberals" (i.e. those who don't align 1:1 with your hate-driven views) actually have condemned him but because the two you quoted haven't, that must mean all "liberals" must agree with what Weinstein has done, right?

 

You are too worried about silly stuff. I want to hear why you leftist people CONDONE atrocious behavior. You crucified Donald Trump for merely talking like a school boy. WTF is wrong with you people??? You want respect???? Start earning it!!!!!!

 

You mean bigger than somebody preaching capitalism but belongs to a socialist organization like the union brotherhood that takes as much as they can for themselves from the very businesses that hire them until they eventually have to throw in the towel and go belly up?

Kind of like that, Mr. Smith old buddy? hehe

 

Elizabeth Warren, Booker, Franken More Democrats to Donate Campaign Cash from Harvey Weinstein


Hillary says she will keep her money from him.....

 

The problem here is that people are losing focus of the fact that 1000's of woman (and maybe men too) have fallen prey to this monster and the political aspect is a separate issue but EVERYONE in the entertainment industry needs to call this prick out as well ... BUT be sensitive to the feeling of the victims here people.

Trump is still fair game and is little better !!!

 

I'm waiting for Smitty to start a thread about married conservative Republicans that preach against abortion, then knock up their girlfriends and encourage them to get one...

 

Conservatives always call out despicable behavior.

 

When he was asked if any woman aborted the result of what she did with Trump, Trump refused to answer. At least he did not lie.

 

Well? We're waiting...

 

For what? There are many degenerates out there on both sides. When one is proven to be guilty Mr Smith never attempts to protect them. I called out the pervert Bill Clinton didn't I?

 

You haven't called out the biggest degenerate of all, your man Trump. Instead, it seems like your lips are super-glued to his ass.

 

Call out donnie, why????.

According to smithy his dear leader was only talking like a school boy.

Tell us @Mr Smith 36 which school did you go to?....let me guess, it was a school that groomed you to be a hypocritical, sanctimonious, sexist fucker...

 

Bull!

 

More two faced hypocrisy from the corrupt and phony liberal leftwing hacks... This woman might be funny if she wasn't so pathetic....


Hypocrisy: Women’s rights champion Lisa Bloom teams up with Harvey Weinstein
Attorney Lisa Bloom is known for representing victims of sexual assault, now she’s defending the accused
Integrity has a price. That is the lesson Attorney Lisa Bloom affirms, as she pivots from being an advocate for victims of sexual assault by high-profile men, to defending the wealthy accused.



Bloom was the vocal and visible lawyer behind many of the women alleging sexual misconduct from Bill Cosby, President Donald Trump and Bill O'Reilly.


Now, after a new report by the New York Times detailed decades of sexual harassment accusations against Hollywood heavyweight Harvey Weinstein, she's not only defending him, but "tutoring" him on how to be a decent, non-toxic human being. Oh, and he's turning one of her books into a television series, so . . .


The Times discovered that Weinstein had reached at least eight settlements with women for sexual misconduct spanning over 30 years.
The award-winning producer responded to the Times with a statement: "I appreciate the way I’ve behaved with colleagues in the past has caused a lot of pain, and I sincerely apologize for it. Though I’m trying to do better, I know I have a long way to go." It's since been reported that Weinstein plans to sue the Times for "false" and "defamatory statements."

Lawyer Bloom released a statement of her own and claimed that Weinstein "denies many of the accusations as patently false," and said, aside from just representing him, Bloom is also tutoring him on power and gender dynamics. She described him as "an old dinosaur learning new ways."

Report Ad


Here is my statement about advising Harvey Weinstein. pic.twitter.com/tGC13ZbOE3

— Lisa Bloom (@LisaBloom) October 5, 2017

Bloom's statement is posted to Twitter and currently sits directly under a pinned tweet at the top of her timeline that links to an MSNBC news segment about the termination of disgraced Fox News host Bill O'Reilly. She quotes the article and says, "You really floored me with this @Lawrence I am used to fighting for others, and here you . . . well

 

Alright. There: I condemn him. I don't know who he is, or if he's even "liberal" or whatever. But he shall be condemned. Happy?

 

It's obvious that many upper level Democrats and main stream media elites knew of Weinstein's sexual misconduct for years. As a result, they all did one of two things, they either helped the man cover up what he had done to so many women, or they just ignored it... Either way, it speaks volumes about the leftwing medias credibility and political bias....

Harvey Weinstein scandal: Ex-Times reporter says Oscar winners called in to help Weinstein out of 2004 jam


The New York Times shocked Hollywood last week with the explosive story of sexual harassment accusations against Harvey Weinstein, which resulted in the mogul being fired from his own company. Now a former Times reporter claims the paper could have exposed Weinstein over a decade ago but the story was watered down by editors after a visit from Weinstein, and calls from two of Hollywood's biggest names.



TheWrap CEO and Editor-in-Chief Sharon Waxman published a story on Sunday night detailing a 2004 incident in which she was given “the green light to look into oft-repeated allegations of sexual misconduct by Weinstein,” when she was a “fairly new reporter at The New York Times” but the story was never published.


Waxman said it was “believed that many” of the allegations against Weinstein occurred overseas, so she traveled to Rome and tracked down Fabrizio Lombardo, the person who ran Miramax Italy. Citing “multiple accounts,” Lombardo “had no film experience and his real job was to take care of Weinstein’s women needs,” she wrote.

TheWrap founder claimed she also “tracked down a woman in London who had been paid off after an unwanted sexual encounter with Weinstein” but was called directly by Weinstein associates such as Matt Damon and Russell Crowe to vouch for Lombardo. In addition, Waxman reported that Weinstein even visited the Times’ newsroom personally to express displeasure at the story she was working on and the story was gutted after he spoke with people above her head at the paper.


Damon's and Crowe's reps did not immediately reply to requests for comment.

“The story was stripped of any reference to sexual favors or coercion and buried on the inside of the Culture section, an obscure story about Miramax firing an Italian executive," Waxman wrote. "Who cared?”


Current Bloomberg editor Jon Landman was the paper’s culture editor at the time and told Waxman that the story wasn’t interesting, according to her report. She said that the Times enabled Weinstein before it eventually exposed him.

“So pardon me for having a deeply ambivalent response about the current heroism of the Times,” Waxman wrote.

Waxman said she “simply gagged” when she read a follow-up Times piece about media enablers who “kept this story from the public” for decades because the paper is one of the news organizations who covered up Weinstein’s history.

Landman declined Fox News’ request for comment, but told Politico: "“Sharon has now had more than a decade to pursue this story unencumbered by me or any New York Times editor. Why, if she had the goods on Weinstein in 2004, has she been unable or unwilling to publish something in the Wrap, where she was in charge? Could it be because she didn’t actually have the goods then, now or in between?” The Times also fired back at Waxman, noting that her 2004 story may not have met the paper’s standards for publication.

"The Times newsroom has a long history of exposing corruption and abuse by powerful people and institutions. Our newsroom was the first to publish a meticulously reported investigation of Mr. Weinstein revealing numerous settlements for sexual harassment,” a Times spokesperson told Fox News. “Our former colleague Sharon Waxman wrote about a story that was published in The Times in 2004. No one currently at The Times has knowledge of editorial decisions made on that story. But in general the only reason a story or specific information would be held is if it did not meet our standards for publication."

Some media industry insiders have asked why Waxman, who runs an outlet that covers the entertainment industry, didn’t publish an updated version of the “gutted” 2004 story detailing the woman in London who had been paid off when she founded TheWrap.

Waxman added an update to her report to address why she didn’t report the story at TheWrap: “Fair question. Five years later, 2009, the moment had passed to go back and write the missing piece about Lombardo, who was no longer on the scene and whose story had been half-published in the Times. Miramax was no longer part of the Walt Disney Company. And I did not have sufficient evidence to write about a pay-off, even though I knew one existed. My focus was on raising money, building a website and starting a media company. In the subsequent years since then I did not hear about further pay-offs or harassment and thought the issue was in the past. Weinstein had made a big effort, supposedly, to curb his temper and behavior, which was reflected in other areas of his public life.”

 

Smitty, do you acknowledge that Trump is also guilty of making unwanted sexual advances to women other than his wife?
Yes or no will be sufficient.