Oh, actually - by def the sexual activity between the 17 and 18 year old would not be child molestation since the USA federal law says 14 and your state law says 16, right?? Remember, the incident involved a 13 year old and an adult, which again - is a crime.

 

It's not a crime in some states, and it's not a crime in most western countries. But if you think XNXX should be purged of criminal confessions, where do you think it should end?

1. Bestiality confessions?
2. Sodomy confessions?
3. Child molestation confessions (18 year old with 16 year old, happened 30 years ago)?
4. Incest confessions?

Is it just confessions in the forum, or is it every story marked "true" that has one of the above acts?

What if it's legal in their country, but not in the US? (Basically, should we ban Canadians?)

 

It depends on the state. My state allows sex with 16 year olds. A dozen states set the limit at 18. Most states don't have exceptions for "children" who are near in age, so someone who is 17 and 11 months with someone who is 18 and 2 months means that the 18 year old is a child molester.

 

It only matters what country the website is hosted in because it's government can shut the website down and ban them from doing business in that country. Yes, you can relocate and relaunch but the damage to the business will be heavy.

You know, why shouldn't they get rid of the sickos who made the non-fictional detailed criminal confessions?? I wouldn't want those people bragging about raping kids and fucking animals on my website. Frankly, I would ban them all because I wouldn't want the reputation of condoning that crap and possibly even putting my business in jeopardy.

 

Umm, ok - I don't know all of the pedo laws for every state... You know, it's still the law whatever it is until someone manages to get it changed. Again, this person was an adult and the child was 13 which is illegal in every USA state, I'm sure.

 

Have a great day, 3210... Thanks for the discussion and I'm now done with this topic.

 

In 20 years most of the sheep on here who currently decry sex with minors will be supporting it while they slander objectors as "thoughtless bigots and pedophobes who can't let their fellow man be happy even in the privacy of his own home. "And of course, "unscientific barbarians who don't understand 'sexual orientation.'"

Ahh, the predictability of time and change.

 

3210launch, You voted YES it is "Ok to Molest Children".

Your yes means you condone and support this,

You may nick pick and claim a "witch hunt" but when someone says they ruined a innocent childs life and has absolutely no conscience about it, that is bragging and show of pride!!! That was the topic that is the issue!!!

The Moderators and Admin have alowed an enormous amount of freedom and flexablity, they express that they still allow an large amount of freedom!!!!

 

14

I was at a stag do recently, ended up in a night club chatting to some girls who were obviously looking for free drink and some fun, a young guy we were with ended up out side with one of the girls in the car park, this was about 2 in the morning, he was giving her a good seeing to when the cops turned up, she immediatley said "you can't arrest me i'm only 14", he is now charged with statutory rape. Is it ok to have sex with underage girls, No, but when they are dressed up and know how to fuck and suck the living daylights out a guy and be out to all hour in the morning at the age of 14 it's time the parents were questioned on there parenting skills. Or maybe there's an other story.

 

Indeed.

I am looking at the poll and see that 16 people are either
a) Incapable of understanding the question
or
b) Thinks it's perfectly fine to molest children.

On the subject of parenting skills.
I fully agree it is up to the parents to inform and monitor their children.
That being said parents abilities are limited to their proximity to their child.
Parents don't know what their kids are up to away from home, at school, at a friends house, etc etc.

I read in a previous post someone said it was okay to molest children because it gave the child a valuable life lesson.

By that logic it's okay to toss you in jail to be raped by Bubba repeatedly as it will give you a life lesson in buttsecks.

It does say something about our society when parents must start giving their kids the "talk" simply to preserve them from sexual predators, like the 16 whom confessed on here.
The age of innocence appears to becoming shorter and shorter.

 

The age of innocence is a myth.

 

I disagree.

My interpretation of the age of innocence is that stage where the child is naive, trusting, honest and unconditionally loving.

What pedophiles do is destroy all that, leading to a lifetime of permanent psychological and emotional damage, all in the name of lust.

 

I agree with Krieg.

 

In a way that's all what needs to be said. I agree very much with this.

But peculiar things happen - I didn't follow closely that forum drama with that alleged woman who was very likely a pedophile man, but a scenario where a mature 13 year old and 19 year old teenagers would have sex is possible and it doesn't sound to me like an adult having sex with a child - they are both teenagers and in that age maturity is not solely defined by the age - I know I was more mature at 13 than quite some guys at 19 and there are many cases like that.

 

Again, I voted yes because the definition that was being used for a child was anyone under the age of 18 (or am I wrong?). There are cases where it is a grey area, therefore I cannot vote yes.
Most of the people who condemn agree that the law may be to strict.

 

The question included "molest" - even if the age limit was 25 to define children - or anyone else - the civilized answer is NO...

It is not ok to molest adults, either.

 

Therein lies the "grey area", however, this issue must be looked at by the eyes of the law, not by psychological definition.
By law, if you are having sex with a person under the age of consent you are molesting the child. Under the AoC, to my understanding means you are not fully understanding the issue at hand.

Yes there are "mature for their age" out there. However, that is a grey matter.
In the case of the person confessing to have sex with someone under the AoC the law is quite clear.

As for "Freedom of Speech" someone once told me it boils down to this..
You have Freedom of speech, yes, but you would not board a plane and in mid flight say "I have a Bomb". Now would you?

Common sense.
Going on to a porn site and professing your pedophilic crimes/ fantasies is bound to get much derision.
It is not infringing on your freedom of speech.
Say what you want, just be prepared for the backlash.

 

I understand all that - and it's stupid of those persons to talk about it - a normal teenage couple with such age difference would just do their thing together and not talk about it anywhere - ok, maybe to some friends; especially if you know that it's technically against the law. Many things that are psychologically normal or even useful are illegal (cannabis among others), but I equally think those are stupid and mechanistic laws, against nature. Molestation should be defined as when the act is not consensual, not proclaiming every sexual act as molestation - even if that 13 year old would be begging for a blowjob... Technical law terminology sucks sometimes and goes against the reality.

I am not defending that forum person - I just say that "psychologically" and "biologically" (or where does the sex maturity fit in) we cannot call every 19 year old an adult and every 13 year old a child. But that has been said here already many times. I'll fuck off now. :rose:

 

I understand the intent and reasoning behind your statement, and in some parts I agree. In this day and age it is difficult to define "maturity" simply by chronological age.
Molestation should be defined as when the act is not consensual. Granted. I fully agree.

However, I am hard pressed to believe anyone under the AoC as defined by both letter and spirit of the law is fully capable of making a completely informed decision regarding sex, especially when they are being coerced by a supposed authority figure.
A person whom they should be looking up to for guidance and life skills.

In my mind consent given under the influence of half truths and disinformation is not consent at all.

 

I agree fully. But I am probably looking from my eyes and I know that I would sell my soul for a blowjob from some of the 19 year old girls I knew when I was 13. It would be beyond consent.

Also - again subjective - you don't look at 19 year old girls for guidance and life skills when you are a 13 year old boy - you look at their asses and boobies.

I am talking about such cases, not the case when really some old "creep" tricks a young teenager into sexual act - that's much much different...