1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. toniter

    toniter No Limits

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    8,780
  2. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,722
    Jesus. Toniter is flitting all over the place today.
    And it isn't a diversion effort.
    Drugs, perhaps?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    1. mstrman
      Intervention time,
       
      mstrman, May 13, 2024
    2. toniter
      Oh look, the bromance is going to the movies together. It's nice to see, really. shooter buys the tickets, mstrman gets the popcorn.
       
      toniter, May 14, 2024
  3. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,722
    The problem isn't so much that Brandon likes to use our aid money to get his way, but rather that when Trump did it (like every other president before him) Trump got impeached.

    Goes back to the same old thing;
    What a despicable does is politics.
    What a deplorable does is criminal.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. toniter

    toniter No Limits

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    8,780
    But, Trump did it for his personal advantage. Therein lies the impeachment.
     
  5. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,722
    Biden did it for his personal advantage.
    Therin lies the hypocrisy.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  6. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,722
    If you think biden acted in our national interest when he threatened to withold congressionally approved aid you can try to make your case.
    It was extortion to call off the investigation into the company his son was on the board of.
    That we know he was on only because they wanted access to biden.
    Said so right there in the transcript.
    Look it up if you didn't already know that.
     
    1. toniter
      You seem to be stuck on this. We've been discussing trump withholding aid to Ukraine compared to Biden holding back bombs from Israel. Shake it off.
       
      toniter, May 15, 2024
  7. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,722
    Hey, you're the one who started comparing trump to biden.

    Seeing the trend with you diverting when you get rubbed in facts that don't match your perception.
     
  8. toniter

    toniter No Limits

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2011
    Messages:
    8,780
    Go to sleep, Bunky. You're all upset.
     
  9. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,722
    Diversion fail.
    Again.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
    1. toniter
      Just remember....Jesus loves you.
       
      toniter, May 15, 2024
  10. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    Go for it MTG. I triple dog dare you.

    Marjorie Taylor Greene to force Biden impeachment vote: 'That’s what we should be doing'

    David Edwards
    June 4, 2024 3:42PM ET



    [​IMG]
    Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene speaking with attendees at the 2022 Student Action Summit. (Gage Skidmore/Flickr)




    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) said she planned to force the U.S. House of Representatives to vote on the impeachment of President Joe Biden.

    While speaking to reporters on Tuesday, Greene criticized Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) for not taking more action after Donald Trump's conviction in New York. And she said that she would defy the speaker by forcing a vote on Biden's impeachment.

    "I'm happy to force everyone up here to vote, because that's what we should be doing," Greene said, according to The Washington Times.

    ALSO READ: Five questions you must ask yourself before voting in November

    Greene could force the vote with a privileged resolution, which does not require Johnson's approval.

    "That's what I'm gonna talk to Speaker Johnson about," Greene explained. "Does he actually really support President Trump? Does he actually mean what he says? And if so, he needs to leave this conference to do it."

    Greene has said that she wanted to impeach Biden because of his border policies.

    https://www.rawstory.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-impeachment-2668453491/
     
  11. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,722
    Didja see? Hunter and Jim biden have been referred for prosecution for lying to congress.
    Anyone taking bets on whether it actually happens?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. umpire2

    umpire2 Share-Man of the Board

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2007
    Messages:
    599,211
    There are more assholes in Congress than guys taking a shit at the SuperBowl.
     
  13. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    This time I'm really going to do it. How stupid, ignorant, and gullible do you have to be to even pretend you believe that at this point?



    [​IMG]
    Comer, after criminal referrals, pledges to go after Biden: ‘This is just the beginning’
    Sarah Fortinsky
    Sun, June 9, 2024 at 4:59 PM MDT·2 min read
    2.1k


    [​IMG]








    House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) said Sunday the criminal referrals against President Biden’s son and brother are “just the beginning,” as he pledged to focus on the president himself in the next stage of his impeachment inquiry.

    “Remember, this is an investigation of Joe Biden,” Comer said in an interview on Fox News’s “Sunday Morning Futures” with Maria Bartiromo. “ leaving the page." data-wf-tooltip-position="bottom" data-wf-reset-every="90">Hunter Biden, Jim Biden, Eric Schwerin, Devon Archer — these are all witnesses in an investigation of Joe Biden. This was always about Joe Biden.”

    “Now, we’re going to do everything we can to hold Hunter Biden and all the different shady associates accountable. This is just the beginning,” he continued. “But the next step will be accountability for Joe Biden.”


    The interview comes after GOP leaders of the impeachment investigation into Biden asked the Justice Department this past Wednesday to bring criminal charges against the president’s son, Hunter, and his brother, James, accusing the duo of lying to lawmakers during conversations with investigators.

    The criminal referrals escalate the stakes of the impeachment inquiry, which has grown quiet in recent months as the investigation has failed to produce evidence of any criminal wrongdoing against Biden and as support for the inquiry appears to have died down.

    But in the Sunday interview, Comer suggested he has no intention of ending his inquiry, accusing Biden of committing “many crimes” and teasing a soon-to-be-released report updating the public on Biden’s alleged crimes.

    “And I think everyone that’s kept up with this investigation will be very eager to see what the next step is,” Comer said.

    Comer also suggested that if Attorney General Merrick Garland does not take up the criminal referrals against the president’s relatives, then former President Trump, who is challenging Biden for a second term in the White House, could appoint an attorney general who would investigate the charges.

    “This is the first step, these criminal referrals,” Comer said. “Everything that we refer to the Department of Justice is within the statute of limitations. In fact, there’s five-year statute of limitations. So, if Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice doesn’t take this up in an appropriate manner, then the next administration and a new attorney general certainly can.”

    The Hill has reached out to the White House for a response.


    https://www.yahoo.com/news/comer-criminal-referrals-pledges-biden-225904408.html
     
  14. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    The two things treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans have proven over and over again is their revenge hearings keep blowing up in their faces. And second they cannot govern. Not even a little bit.


    'Really disappointed': Comer's ethics bill falls apart as key players pull support

    Alex Henderson, AlterNet
    June 17, 2024 2:37PM ET



    [​IMG]
    WASHINGTON, DC - DECEMBER 5: (L-R) Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) speaks with House Oversight Committee chairman Rep. James Comer (R-KY) during a House Oversight Subcommittee on Health Care and Financial Services hearing on Capitol Hill December 5, 2023 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)




    Despite all their political differences, pro-Donald Trump House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) and liberal Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA) joined forces in May for a bipartisan White House ethics bill.

    But the bill, according to The Hill's Rebecca Beitsch, "fell apart" when three Democratic lawmakers withdrew their support for it. Porter believes that three Democratic lawmakers — Reps. Ro Khanna of California, Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois and Kweisi Mfume of Maryland — turned against the bill because of the Biden White House.

    Porter told The Hill, "I was excited to come to Washington to introduce my bill, and was proud that I had found three senior Democratic co-sponsors. When I landed, I was really disappointed to learn that those co-sponsors had decided not to support the bill and had had conversations with the White House."

    READ MORE:'Vacant look': Author alarmed by Trump’s 'severe memory issues'

    Khanna, however, is arguing that the bill wasn't genuinely bipartisan but says the Biden White House didn't influence his decision to withdraw support.

    The California Democrat told The Hill, "I don't think it was bipartisan enough, but I made the decision independently. No one called me."

    Similarly, Mfume — a former NAACP president — told The Hill, "I wanted to see a larger bipartisan effort. I was under the belief that there would be, and when there wasn't, I just said, 'Let me step off.'"

    Beitsch notes that the Comer/Porter bill would "impose a series of disclosure requirements on both presidents and vice presidents, including on any foreign income earned either by themselves or their relatives."

    READ MORE:'Ludicrous, ridiculous, dangerous and incendiary': Ex-Trump lawyer rips Judge Cannon's 'palpable bias'

    https://www.rawstory.com/james-comer-2668537493/
     
  15. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,722
    There's a point to this story, probably.

    It skewers deplorables investigating brandon, according to American hater, but skewers despicables who apparently think ethics for elected officials is a political game.
     
    • Like Like x 1