Is that the best that you libs have to attack him on? His weight?

The main problem with him is that he's too much like you guys. He's too much of a RINO lib. He's Mittens 2.0.

 

Of course he is. He's from New Jersey after all. You think they would elect an actual conservative in New Jersey?

 

No. Just like the home of the late womanizer, drunk, and drowner of a woman in a lake Teddy Kennedy wouldn't elect an actual conservative governor. They elected Mittens instead.

 

I believe that you must be slipped of your ability to think using basic logic.You scream that I must be a liberal just because I make fun of an overweight man that happens to be Republican with out any knowledge of my political affiliations. Do you believe that anyone that does not walk in step with your opinions is automatically some level of evil Nazi Liberal Democrat? I find you to be lacking in intelligence and verbal skills, you bore me.

 

My point is that personal attacks are NOT arguments or sound reasons to be against someone for public office. The reason why I DON'T support Christie doesn't have jack to do with his weight or appearance. It's his IDEAS that I'm against.

My appraisal of you as a lib is based on reading various posts that you've written and not just the one that I responded to above.

 

No, you got me all wrong.

I made my comment because that post was ridiculously fragmented and came to an equally ridiculous conclusion, just as this one did.

You conclude that I was defending the deforestation of the planet, which I have not done. To the contrary, I am all for the preservation of forests, just as I am all for using nature in a kinder and gentler fashion.

What you seem to be blind to is that hemp and bamboo production require open land to grow, so you must be advocating cutting down forests to save them.

 

Rasta Hog built his house out of hemp and the wolf had bacon that day. It's the only reason he had to eat the two other pigs because that damn pig gave him the munchies.

 

Now that the Justice Dept. has said that Native Americans can grow, consume and sell marijuana on their land, a tribe has taken them up on it.
A Sioux Tribe in South Dakota will begin selling marijuana Jan 1, 2016 to anybody 21 and above. The problem is that you can't take it off the reservation so they are building a cannabis club where people can partake on site.

I don't like it as most people would rather take it home to consume but hey, it's South Dakota so this is a good start.

http://thejointblog.com/south-dakota-tribe-to-begin-selling-cannabis-to-everyone-21-by-january-1st/

 

The death draft solution warrants that many psychotropic illegal substances be leaked into the over populous.

 

[QUOTE="
Although illegal under federal law, the Obama administration has instructed the Department of Justice not to challenge states that move forward with legalization, so long as tight regulation accompanies a much looser stance towards the drug.

[/url][/QUOTE]

That RIGHT THERE is a VIOLATION by the President of his OATH of Office. He's Sworn to Enforce the Laws of the United States NOT to Ignore Them!

 

That RIGHT THERE is a VIOLATION by the President of his OATH of Office. He's Sworn to Enforce the Laws of the United States NOT to Ignore Them![/QUOTE]
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx_________________________________________________________________
A legal, regulated market for weed is far better than the criminal market for weed. Regulated business will now be able to continue creating good jobs and generating tax revenue in the states that voted to legalize. It's the will of the people in those states. In fact, more people voted for legalized weed than for the president in Colorado.

At any rate, Congress has passed three amendments preventing the DEA and the Justice Dept from undermining state marijuana laws.


"WASHINGTON, D.C.—Legislators passed three amendments today to prohibit the DEA and U.S. Department of Justice from undermining state marijuana laws, as part of the U.S. House of Representatives' consideration of the Fiscal Year 2016 Commerce, Justice, and Science Appropriations bill. A fourth amendment failed. The House also passed an amendment last night ending the DEA’s controversial bulk data collection program. It also passed three amendments cutting $23 million from the DEA’s budget, and shifted it to fighting child abuse, processing rape test kits, reducing the deficit, and paying for body cameras on police officers to reduce law enforcement abuses."
- See more at: http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/2015...ing-state-marijuana-laws#sthash.J4ZU28c4.dpuf

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx_________________________________________________________________
A legal, regulated market for weed is far better than the criminal market for weed. Regulated business will now be able to continue creating good jobs and generating tax revenue in the states that voted to legalize. It's the will of the people in those states. In fact, more people voted for legalized weed than for the president in Colorado.

At any rate, Congress has passed three amendments preventing the DEA and the Justice Dept from undermining state marijuana laws.


"WASHINGTON, D.C.—Legislators passed three amendments today to prohibit the DEA and U.S. Department of Justice from undermining state marijuana laws, as part of the U.S. House of Representatives' consideration of the Fiscal Year 2016 Commerce, Justice, and Science Appropriations bill. A fourth amendment failed. The House also passed an amendment last night ending the DEA’s controversial bulk data collection program. It also passed three amendments cutting $23 million from the DEA’s budget, and shifted it to fighting child abuse, processing rape test kits, reducing the deficit, and paying for body cameras on police officers to reduce law enforcement abuses."
- See more at: http://www.drugpolicy.org/news/2015...ing-state-marijuana-laws#sthash.J4ZU28c4.dpuf[/QUOTE]
This bill is not yet law.

 

Sorry Rixer, you can TRY to shift blame and coverup for Odumboears all you want, but Facts are Facts. Congress makes the LAWS, UNTILL Congress Changes the Laws, The President is OATH BOUND to uphold them; REGARDLESS OF IF HE AGREES WITH THEM OR NOT!

FDR didn't like Prohibition, and worked on getting it overturned. Yet he NONETHELESS Prosecuted Federal Alcohol Violations as the Law at the Time Required.

The SAME thing applies to Immigration! Guess you're FINE with the BP Ghestapo stopping and ID'ing CITIZENS IN OUR OWN COUNTRY, YET NOT DEPORTING ILLEGAL BOARDER CROSSERS! And IT WAS DER FEURER THAT STARTED THAT MESS!

 

And how much money and lives are you willing to lose to see Obama trample over state's rights and the will of the voters when history has shown us it doesn't work? Besides, Obama hasn't exactly been a friend to marijuana reform anyway.

At any rate, you might have to start typing in an even bigger font after the 2016 elections as there will likely be about 7 more states voting in legal recreational cannabis.

Massachusetts
California
Missouri
Hawaii
Maine
Nevada
Arizona