1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
  1. Bron Zeage

    Bron Zeage I am a river to my people

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2014
    Messages:
    13,615
    Military strategy, weapons engineering, and now healthcare, you've covered all the bases. It's too bad I'm the only person who listens to you.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #41
  2. msman

    msman Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    11,156
    Pearls before swine.
     
    #42
  3. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    105,091
    Hey @msman where are those complaints, you, Trump and his lawyer, and Fox News said were going to be filed?
     
    1. slutwolf
      buried under the wall perhaps ,

      or lost in all those instructions to his generals , on how to rid the world of IS ,
      which also seem to be lost somewhere
       
      slutwolf, Jun 16, 2017
      Trev1 likes this.
    #43
  4. M4MPetCock

    M4MPetCock Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    13,642
    "Long list"? Is it anywhere near as long as the list of
    coincidental cadavers.jpg
     
    #44
  5. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    105,091
    @slutwolf
    I don't care much for comments. But when I saw your name because ... well ... I guess because you said it, I decided to look. Dude, use the reply or multi quote. Other people ought to see what you have to say.

    To which:

    It was a bluff, it is still a bluff, and it will always be a bluff. Because the second they file an actual cmplaint the shit gets real and they are required to prove what they are saying. A very high legal bar because they are lying and they know it.

    And actually under Trump it is the "Generals" who get to decide troop levels, booming raids, anything they deem necessary anywhere in the world. Where has that ever gone wrong?

    But so far at least it hasn't turned too terrible because they are still doing basically the same thing President Obama was doing.
     
    1. shootersa
      Oh, not quite.
      Not quite at all.
      Obama was anal about being involved in military planning.

      Trump wisely said "I have experts for this, they know a lot more than I do about this, and I should rely on them".
      For one thing, they know it isn't "booming raids" but "bombing raids" :D
      Not that it meant anything to unsupporters. They even bitch about that.
       
      shootersa, Jun 17, 2017
    #45
  6. Mayling

    Mayling SEX FIEND

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2015
    Messages:
    8,710
    Stumbles --> Vote for Donald. I did. I think.

    politics 1.jpg
     
    #46
  7. Deleted User kekw

    Deleted User kekw Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    8,657
    Is a word salad of white text on red background superimposed on a black and white photograph enough evidence to convince you of something?
     
    #47
  8. M4MPetCock

    M4MPetCock Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    13,642
    It depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is. Also, can I get Russian dressing on the salad?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #48
  9. Deleted User kekw

    Deleted User kekw Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    8,657
    So, yes.

    You literally posted propaganda in the other thread. You're done.
     
    #49
  10. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    105,091
    It depends on what is the meaning of obstructionism of justice is.

    Oh sorry ...I guess that was more than one word.
     
    #50
  11. M4MPetCock

    M4MPetCock Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    13,642
    Ooohhh, is that a peanut in your pocket or are you just a little-dicked whiner?

    And how "done" am I? Medium rear? hystery.gif
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #51
  12. Deleted User kekw

    Deleted User kekw Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    8,657
    Everybody knows you like it raw. Slut.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #52
  13. M4MPetCock

    M4MPetCock Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    13,642
    Wow! How'd you know I like Sushi?
     
    #53
  14. Deleted User kekw

    Deleted User kekw Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    8,657
    Nigiri ;)
     
    1. deleted user 777 698
      Damn kid, you ARE a glutton for punishment aren't you? Hmm, I'll bet you like being tied up, don't you...
       
      deleted user 777 698, Jun 19, 2017
    #54
  15. Mayling

    Mayling SEX FIEND

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2015
    Messages:
    8,710
    Originalism . I think.
     
    1. Mayling
      You need some originalism stumbles. I think.
      politics 4.jpg
       
      Mayling, Jun 16, 2017
    #55
  16. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    105,091
    Hey guys where are those complaints you, Trump and his lawyer, and Fox News said were going to be filed?
     
    #56
  17. msman

    msman Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2010
    Messages:
    11,156
    Conservative watchdog Judicial Watch is calling on Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe to recover and release federal records and memos it claims were “unlawfully” removed by former Director James Comey, threatening the FBI with a lawsuit should the bureau not comply.



    Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, penned a letter to McCabe on June 14 warning of a potential violation of the Federal Records Act, which is the basis for the federal government’s policies regarding the “creating, maintaining, and disposing” of federal records.

    “As you may be aware, the Federal Records Act imposes a direct responsibility on you to take steps to recover any records unlawfully removed from the FBI,” Fitton wrote in the letter, claiming Comey unlawfully removed memos that could contain contents regarding the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election. “Upon learning that records have been unlawfully removed from the FBI, you then are required to initiate action through the Attorney General for the recovery of records.”
     
    #57
  18. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    105,091
    So Judaical Watch and CNN are both demanding the same thing. That's interesting.

    Now where are those complaints you, Trump and his lawyer, and Fox News said were going to be filed?
     
    #58
  19. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    105,091
    Honestly I have never seen such an insane clown show in my life.

    Last week Trump's personal attorney did something some claim is illegal and many legal experts say at the very least unetheical and a violation of state bar regulations when he held a meeting with members of the White House staff where among other things he told them they did not need to get their own personal lawyers. Which almost all legal experts say is just insane advice because as the investigations keep expanding and more and more White House staffers get called into talk to the Special Counsel having their own attorney is absolutely essential to keep them from getting into serious legal trouble and without their own attorny to advise theyt would be sitting ducks.

    But then yesterday it was revealed VP Mike Pence has hired his own personal attorney to deal with the investigations.

    And today it is being rep0rted that even Trump's own personal attorney has hired his own personal attorney to represent him as the investigations unfold.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    1. shootersa
      Well, but when there is a witch hunt afoot, it makes sense one would want a few fire extinguishers available to douse the flames the angry villagers show up with.

      No matter. Assuming your post is accurate, you'd be bitching if White House Staff were counseled to get legal representation, as in "What have they got to hide?"
       
      shootersa, Jun 17, 2017
    #59
  20. M4MPetCock

    M4MPetCock Porn Star Banned!

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    13,642
    Under Obama, no less.

    (Just a few snippets from a 25 page PDF.)

    Controlled Unclassified Information


    Background
    In November 2010, the President issued Executive Order 13556, Controlled Unclassified Information, 75 FR 68675 (November 4, 2010) (the Order) to “establish an open and uniform program for managing [unclassified] information that requires safeguarding or dissemination controls.” Prior to that time, more than 100 different markings for such information existed across the executive branch. This ad hoc, agency-specific approach created inefficiency and confusion, led to a patchwork system that failed to adequately safeguard information requiring protection, and unnecessarily restricted information-sharing.

    Subpart A—General Information
    § 2002.1
    Purpose and scope.
    (a) This part describes the executive branch's Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Program (the CUI Program) and establishes policy for designating, handling, and decontrolling information that qualifies as CUI.

    (b) The CUI Program standardizes the way the executive branch handles information that requires protection under laws, regulations, or Government-wide policies, but that does not qualify as classified under Executive Order 13526, Classified National Security Information, December 29, 2009 (3 CFR, 2010 Comp., p. 298), or any predecessor or successor order, or the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011, et seq.), as amended.
    ...
    (rr) Unauthorized disclosure occurs when an authorized holder of CUI intentionally or unintentionally discloses CUI without a lawful Government purpose, in violation of restrictions imposed by safeguarding or dissemination controls, or contrary to limited dissemination controls.
     
    1. M4MPetCock
      that[s leaking.gif
       
      M4MPetCock, Jun 16, 2017
    #60