DEFUND THE POLICE!!!!



‘Defund the FBI!’ Marjorie Taylor Greene Melts Down Over Mar-a-Lago Raid
By Kipp JonesAug 8th, 2022, 10:28 pm
276 comments



Alex Wong/Getty Images

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) called for the defunding of federal law enforcement for the second time in as many weeks Monday after former President Donald Trump’s home was raided by the FBI.

A call to “defund the FBI” was published on her Twitter page amid a full meltdown in the hours after it was reported Mar-a-Lago was searched by federal agents seeking documents on behalf of the National Archives.


Trump posted a statement notifying the world early Monday evening his estate was teeming with feds.

“These are dark times for our Nation, as my beautiful home, Mar-A-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, is currently under siege, raided, and occupied by a large group of FBI agents,” he said. “They even broke into my safe!”

Trump was immediately defended by prominent conservatives who railed against President Joe Biden, Democrats and what many perceived as a politicized Justice Department.

Greene, a strong supporter of Trump, jumped to his defense on Twitter through a series of posts.

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/d...aylor-greene-melts-down-over-mar-a-lago-raid/

 

The FBI is the Gazpacho.

 

Which is also why all of a sudden its the Republicans running around screaming DEFUND THE POLICE.

 

To treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans Traitor Trump is their Chosen One. Trump is infallible and untouchable. No laws, the Constitution, or even national security can be applied to him. That is how much they hate the United States of America.


Marjorie Taylor Greene files articles of impeachment against Garland

• 
  

Caroline Vakil
Fri, August 12, 2022 at 5:09 PM·1 min read


In this article:

• 
  

• 
  

• Merrick Garland
  American judge and 86th United States Attorney General

• 
  Donald Trump
  45th President of the United States

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) announced on Friday that she had filed articles of impeachment against Attorney General Merrick Garland as the FBI’s search of the former president’s Florida residence roils Republicans.

Greene’s resolution claims that the attorney general’s “personal approval to seek a search warrant for the raid on the home of the 45th President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, constitutes a blatant attempt to persecute a political opponent.”

The search warrant was approved by a federal judge and was unsealed on Friday after the Justice Department and Trump’s attorneys agreed.

The warrant showed that the FBI secured classified materials that were taken to Mar-a-Lago and suggests the former president is being investigated for possible violations of the Espionage Act.


Republicans, including Greene, have repeatedly accused the Justice Department of going after Trump for political reasons.

Her resolution claims that Garland’s “effort to unseal the search warrant for the home of former President Donald J. Trump constitutes an attempt to intimidate, harass, and potentially disqualify a political challenger to President Joseph R. Biden, Jr.”

The White House has said Biden had no knowledge of the FBI’s search, and no evidence has been presented to dispute that. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment to The Hill.

Articles of impeachment against Garland are unlikely to pass in Congress given the Democratic majority, and it’s not clear how many Republicans would support the resolution.



https://www.yahoo.com/news/marjorie-taylor-greene-files-articles-230944790.html

 

But stumbler already explained in another thread how the timing and decision to raid Trump's residence was politically based.

You agree with stumbler, Don't you?

 

First of all this is a lie. I am white and I watch porn because I love fucking. And I can always learn something new.

But the men Green knows probably watch porn because they are the poor poor pitiful me eternally wounded little snowflake victims. And that repulses most women so they sit home fuckless, Just like the ones we see around here.

Marjorie Taylor Greene: White men watch porn because they are 'most persecuted identity' in US

David Edwards
August 15, 2022



Facebook/screen grab

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) asserted over the weekend that white men watch pornography and play video games because they are the "most persecuted" group in the United States.

In an interview with podcaster Daniel Schmidt, Greene lashed out at what she said was an attack on white males.

"I believe that white men are the most persecuted identity in America," Greene claimed. "And that's a bold statement to make but I'll break that down."

"Let's talk about why white men and young white men, in particular, are really, they're put, you guys are put bottom on the list of so many things," she continued. "The reason I stick up for white men is I know for a fact when you guys apply to college, you're put down at the bottom of the list and everyone is allowed to be accepted and admitted into college and then they finally move on to the white men."

Greene also claimed that the persecution of white men caused them to spend time alone watching pornography and playing video games.

"Through our entire culture, white men are bad," the lawmaker complained. "But what that's done to your generation and even some of those a little older than you and those definitely younger than you is it's created hopelessness in many of these guys."

Greene added: "No one is there for them as they are growing up. They spend hours and hours alone, which is what do they do with their time when they are alone? They don't have an after-school job if they are in high school. Maybe they probably don't play a sport. So they're spending hours and hours time alone, which turns them to all kinds of bad things: porn on the internet, reading crazy stuff in chat rooms and God knows who's in there and saying what they're saying. A lot of time playing video games."

Watch the video clips below.

https://www.rawstory.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-white-men/

 

What the fuck do these two things have in common? NOTHING!

 

OH no, Shooter isn't lying. Here's the post Shooter referred to. Now, Shooter is always fair in providing someone with the opportunity to reply and explain themselves when Shooter catches them in a lie. So, Stumbler, can you point to the part(s) of your post that explain the LEGAL basis for the search warrant, you know, rather than the POLITICAL basis?

​

 

Poor Maggie....

 

I am not kidding one bit when I say it is just fucking hilarious the way you prove yourself a blatant liar for all the board to see. And I do mean as in literally just make me laugh my ass off.

@shootersa I am literally laughing out loud at you trying to claim that I said the raid was politically based when everything in that post proves the opposite. If the decision to get the search warrant was politically based they never would have searched Mar a Lago before the mid terms. Because just as I said they knew Trump and treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans would just go ape shit crazy over the FBI searching Mar a Lago the home of their Chosen One Traitor Trump who all you believe is infallible and untouchable i.e. kicking a political hornets nest. Which it did. Not only resulting in demonizing the FBI and DOJ and treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans screaming to DEFUND the FBI but also threats of violence and civil war including one actual instance of a Trump supporting Truth Social member actually attacking an FBI office and getting killed over it.

And while I didn't spell it out in that particular post I have made multiple posts proving that what made Garland and the FBI resort to getting a search warrant to search Mar a Lago is they had an informant on the inside that told them Trump was not only hiding TS/SCI documents including what is believed to include our nuclear weapons program he was also preparing to destroy evidence. That is what made Garland decide to get a search warrant after what is reported to be weeks of deliberations. What their informant told them left Garland with no choice but to go into Mar a Lago and remove the national security threat.

_Proving the last thing it was was political.

 

@stumbler
So then what part of your post highlighted the LEGAL points of getting a search warrant?
It all talked about the POLITICAL considerations, eh?

Double down. The forum mem ers are laughing as well.

 

See how it works? Treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans constantly scream about government overreach and our personal freedo0ms. Except they demand the state be able to dictate what a woman does with her own body and parents belong in prison if they violate Sharia Law for Christians.

Marjorie Taylor Greene introduces bill to make gender-affirming care for transgender youth a felony

Brooke Migdon
Fri, August 19, 2022 at 9:30 AM


Story at a glance

• 
  Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Friday introduced a measure that would make it a felony to provide gender-affirming medical care including puberty blockers and hormones to transgender youth under 18.
  

• The measure would also prohibit using federal funds for gender-affirming health care, including in Affordable Healthcare Act plans, and bar colleges and universities from offering instruction on gender-affirming care.
  

• The bill has 12 Republican co-sponsors so far.
  

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) introduced a bill Friday that would make providing gender-affirming medical care to transgender minors a felony, punishable by up to 25 years in prison.


Greene’s “Protect Children’s Innocence Act” outlaws more than a dozen medical interventions and procedures used to treat gender dysphoria in transgender young people, including puberty blockers, hormone therapy and certain kinds of surgeries done “for the purpose of changing the body of such individual to correspond to a sex that differs from their biological sex.”

The measure would also prohibit using federal funds for gender-affirming health care, including in Affordable Healthcare Act plans.

“When it comes to ‘gender-affirming care,’ which is really child abuse, this is actually an assault and it’s child abuse,” Greene said Thursday evening during an appearance on Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”

America is changing faster than ever! Add Changing America to your Facebook or Twitter feed to stay on top of the news.

“This practice should never happen,” Greene told host Tucker Carlson. “It’s so disgusting and appalling … this needs to be illegal.”

Under Greene’s bill, anyone who “knowingly performs any gender-affirming care on a minor” is guilty of a class C felony, carrying a punishment of 10 to 25 years in prison and a maximum fine of $250,000, Greene’s office said.

The measure is similar to a first-of-its-kind Alabama law passed earlier this year that makes it a felony, punishable by up to a decade in prison, for doctors or others to assist transgender youth younger than 19 in accessing gender-affirming medical care, including puberty blockers or hormone therapy.

A federal judge in May partially blocked state officials from enforcing the law, ruling that Alabama had not produced any credible evidence that gender-affirming health care is “experimental” and parents – not the states or the federal courts – play the primary role in caring for their children.

Attorneys for the state have sought to appeal the decision.

Greene’s bill would also prohibit institutions of higher education from providing instruction on gender-affirming care and bar doctors that have provided gender-affirming care to a minor from receiving visas or being admitted to the U.S.

Greene’s bill has 12 Republican cosponsors so far: Reps. Mary Miller (Ill.), Jeff Duncan (S.C.), Bob Good (Va.), Ralph Norman (S.C.), Matt Gaetz (Fla.), Tony Gonzales (Texas), Rep. Diana Harshbarger (Tenn.), Clay Higgins (La.), Burgess Owens (Utah), Claudia Tenney (N.Y.), Andrew Clyde (Ga.) and Lance Gooden (Texas).

House Republican leaders have started to lean into culture war fights regarding transgender individuals, with House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) pledging to bring up a bill that prohibits transgender athletes from competing in women’s sports if Republicans win the House majority.

Greene on Friday tweeted that two Republican U.S. Senate candidates – J.D. Vance of Ohio and Blake Masters of Arizona – have promised to support her bill if they are elected.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/marjorie-taylor-greene-introduces-bill-153040163.html

 

From "Marjorie Taylor Greene introduces bill to make gender-affirming care for transgender youth a felony"

This is a short article. The term "gender-affirming" appears 9 times in it, almost once for every 2 sentences.
I do not think that gender-affirming means the same thing to the author and to most of the rest of us.
Finally, when does something go from news to becoming propaganda, and how do we tell?

 

Guess stumbler isn't going to explain further how his post about the warrant thingy was legal and not political.

 

Does anyone really need to explain it to you?

1. Trump took government material
2. The government asked for it back
3. Trump refused
4. The government got a warrant to get their stuff
5. Now Trump whines "it's political", when everything appears to be done by the book

 

Anon drank the Kool aid.
We got that.
Good for you.

But while we have you here, did stumbler send you to answer for him, or are you just lonely?

 

Marjorie Taylor Green thinks we should end NATO and let the Russians conquer Ukraine.

 

You laugh out loud a lot. Please continue "LOL" even though nothing that you wrote in what was posted above proves anything about the raid not being political. There is literally "no proof" to support your claim.
That's an assertion on your part, which is okay. Just recognize it for what it is.

That is another assertion you've made. May be true, may not be true. It may make sense to you and others too, but it ignores the possibility that there might have been other political factors or goals which forced their hand. For sure, when the government tells us now that they do not want the Mar-a-Lago search warrant affidavit released to the public because the investigation is in its "early stages," every Federal prosecutor, active or retired, reminds us that that is not true. Federal warrants are almost always procured late in the investigation...so perhaps someone considered the mid-terms to not be a factor. Like you, I just don't know.

I am pretty sure that that might be what was leaked anonymously, but I don't think it is part of what Garland has told us on the record, so far anyway -- as far as I am aware. For example, "...a report said Thursday. People familiar with the investigation told The Washington Post..." Certainly, no one in authority has said on the record that this material was the driving factor in authorizing the raid. If I am wrong about this, I will apologize.

By itself, this unsourced leak(s) sounds ominous, just as it was meant to, but it could relate to anything up to and including out of date material on the Iranian nuclear program. And note how reporters are always parsing their words, are always careful to say that the documents have "classified" (or whatever) stamped at the top, which literally could just be explained as being copies of classified documents which were later declassified but still retain the old heading.

I think you're speculating here, but we still remain most appreciative of your mind reading skills.

 

No! Anon follows the News. If you took your Trump goggles off for one moment, you just might see reality for once!

Not lonely, just trying to educate the rabble that ignore reality.

 

Taking these one at a time:

1. Trump took government material -- Agreed, as all presidents have done.
2. The government asked for it back -- Agreed. Trump representatives met with govt employees at least twice that we know of.
3. Trump refused -- We've reached the sticky wicket with this assertion. You take for granted that what is being leaked to the press is true, Trump says it's not true.
4. The government got a warrant to get their stuff -- Agreed. An unprecedented step, given how the FBI has treated others, all Democrats, in the same situation.
5. Now Trump whines "it's political", when everything appears to be done by the book -- Kind of a harsh evaluation, given that you are just assuming that the side you prefer is telling the truth. And what do you mean, "when everything appears to be done by the book?" Unless you are in the inside, you have no more idea than I do if everything is being done by the book.

Given the FBI history over the last 6 years (actually going back for decades), and all of the anonymous leaking which only supports one side of the story (just like we have previously seen in the RussiaGate Probe, the Mueller Investigation, Impeachment 1, Impeachment 2, the J6 Committee and now the Mar-a-Lago Raid), assuming that you are getting the truth now, this time, seems to be a bit of a dangerous stretch. Anonymous leaks like these almost always end up being some type of disinformation campaign driving someone's unknown agenda.

The fact that you are still willing to continue accepting this kind of unverified and anonymous leaking after everything that has happened, just to drive your politics, speaks volumes about your partisanship.

PS How do you guys like my yellow text?