http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVIoz-CzDrk

 

Most unusual. Well, it is for me. First cannibalism story I think I ever read. Was eating a bacon sandwich while doing it.

One criticism, when they cut Abby open and pulled her intestines out she would have died pretty quickly and if not then, then certainly from shock when the poles were slid through her with her belly sliced open. Either way she wouldnt have survived til the spit roast.

 

Most likely. Adding local anesthetics wouldn't have made for as good a story though, I think. Pain and shock are the two causes of death I tend to ignore in all my stories, for the purposes of plot.

This is part of why I don't usually use spit-roasting though. It's got far too many issues for keeping someone alive on it. Thanks to Dolcett's artwork though, it's become the standard in the genre, so I pretty much had to use it somewhere. I think people just like the imagery of a long, hard, phallus through the woman's entire body.

It may be possible to survive... People have survived amputations without anesthetic in battlefield situations. Some people, long ago, were executed by impaling them on a spike like this, and managed to survive for hours, at least. But it's certainly stretching the bounds of what's humanly possible, if it even is humanly possible.

 

I must say it's preety good story, but human meat isn't that much tasty, trust me.

 

You would know?

Everything I've read has basically said that we taste similar to pork, but sweeter, which sounds great. All the artificial chemicals that we eat though would decrease our meat quality. So it's hard to be sure.

Also don't forget, something is going to taste better if the idea of eating it gives the eater sexual pleasure.

I hope that I taste great, but I'll never know for sure.

 

You never know that you'll never know.

And, because Dolcett's artwork encourages a standard, that doesnt mean you cant break away and create your own. This is how genres of art are created. Do something brilliant dinner!:excited:

 

I liked, too. I am not a voraphile, but I can see how you characterize the pain of loss and the desire to sample the taboo... I read your vore stories because I like how you work with the characters, and while I do squick, at some point I get over it and start to see how you sensualize it and make what is usually repellent an intriguing concept.

 

That's true.

Oh, I know I don't HAVE to... But I pretty much have to once, if you understand my meaning. It's hard to explain exactly. This is that once.

- Sarah

 

I'm glad you like them despite the squicking. I really do try to get the mentality of the characters right for the story. I think about what my mind would do if I was in their exact situation. It's great to hear that I've been good at doing that.

- Sarah

 

Different but a good read.

 

I enjoyed this story, even though there are some aspects of it that are too unbelievable. A mother would be driven by revenge and fury at the loss of her daughter. However, I love consensual torture and death stories, which you really did touch on well in the second part of the story. I write Dolcett stories myself and I like to focus on the slave or victims point of view...the tension between submission and fear.

 

i love u

 

There are a lot of possible reactions to things. Fury is one possible reaction to losing one's child, but for some the trauma of it may be so much that the person mentally shuts down and becomes complacent. Especially with the added trauma of watching her get cooked and eating some of her. Add to that the fact that the person who bought her isn't actually responsible for Abby's death, that everything Sarah was (a mother) is now gone leaving an empty void where her purpose in life was, and Sarah's new owner providing her with a constant distraction from what just happened (which she doesn't want to have to think about), and she winds up with Stockholm Syndrome.

 

I couldnt read it all, I felt like crying. I skipped to then to see if there was a "happy" ending but none. YOUR FUCKEN AWESOME! Im a pretty messed up person but I couldnt handle this. Kudos!

 

Was this how your daughter looked the last time you saw her?

 

Submission, Torture and Death....

Dinner....

There are two decidedly different stories here. The first is the kidnapping and the death of Abby in front of her mother's eyes. This on its own is compelling but is much more nonconsensual for my personal tastes.

Also, one of the longstanding myths of Dolcett, what I call "Dolcett Sexual Romanticism", is that girls impaled and disemboweled somehow survive to be cooked alive. This is simply beyond reality for me. The trauma from the opening of the wound would be enough to render shock and death. Also, just as a practical note for your future stories, disembowelment must be accompanied by the cutting out of the bung hole (anus) first, so that the bowels are released from the flesh. The bowels are supported by the stomach at the top and the bung at the bottom. As I studied butchering for hunters, I learned this.

The second part of the stories which echoes of the movie and novel "Boxing Helena" is very different in its tone. The woman is completely enthralled with her submission to her Master. There is no transition for this from the killing of her daughter, so the story doesn't seem in context.
Also, since we know that this was non-consensual at the beginining, her consent in the latter half is incongruous with the rest of the story. Having doled out that criticism, I found the second part of the story very erotic and enjoyed myself on more than one occaision rereading. The complete acknowledgement that she has no control over her own life or even any sense of personhood is deeply submissive and exciting to me.

What I find happens is that I get excited when I am writing this stuff and I race ahead and don't take the time to develop the stuff in between. One of the reasons I like Dolcett is that the backstory is already preexistent and I just have to put characters into it.

Keep working. I will keep reading.

 

Weird but interesting