That reminds me of a funny clip I saw I wish I could remember where. It was an office setting also, but there were all these GQ looking guys being really lewd with the women there and they were all getting turned on by it. Some average to geeky looking guy says something that could be taken as a light flirt and one of the girls starts screaming sexual harasssment. It goes off by saying something like "It is only sexual harassment if you aren't attractive."

 

lol

-S-

 

What people do nowadays so wrong. Think if we went back in time and brought back some of the punishments.

 

Remind me never to piss you off.

On topic:
Thats just fucked

 

I'd be the torturer and I'd never get fined.

 

did they cum

 

Fuck me dead, sick fucks. People like that should be shot.

 

like how all the thought is on the rape and not how thay carved her back as thay played a game

 

I love how casually some members of this forum talk of committing torture and murder, but I get frowned upon for making somewhat of a tasteless joke. A sarcastic sense of humor is apparently more upsetting than another person saying they want to beat in the head of another with a bat or castrate them.

Gotta love the irony.

-S-

 

......admit it you still want to know who won

 

Actually no, I really was just making a joke. I don't care about the woman, the two men or the game. Although I will say it takes an unusually sadistic sense of humor to play tic-tac-toe on a person's back. It's nice to know all the psychos aren't in my neck of the woods; that the Brits still have a few. At least I assume the perpetrators were British. You didn't post the article source so I suppose they could be Canadians. I just know that Americans don't call it noughts and crosses.

-S-

 

thay were british and sorry hold on http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/Noughts-and-crosses-39carved39-into.3402289.jp

that better

 

YES!!! Shake we have way to much in common. i think the same thing to. its hypocritical if you ask me.

 

im not letting you turn my thread in to another flame war

 

How's that a flame?

-S-

 

because he know im going to challange his words then he will start flame wars i have seen it

 

Takes two to tango, babe. However you don't find it just a little bit hypocritical (to use Inc's word) or ironic (to use my word) that some people who've replied to this thread advocate getting justice for a heinous crime by committing another heinous crime?

-S-

 

I agree but what you call hypocritical alot of people call justice a person made somone suffer in turn should suffer (karma gods at work)
not that I agree but its hard not to sypothise with the victim and want her to have revenge
(once again id like to say not my words)

 

That's all Inc and I were saying. Why would you have to challenge him if you agree with his opinion. I think mayhap you're looking for a fight where one wasn't intended. Inc seems a decent enough sort of guy, just not high on the compassion scale, especially where stupid people are concerned. That he says things that might rub people the wrong way doesn't mean he's trying to start a fight or a flame war. It is perhaps peoples quickness to criticize him so harshly that leads to his over-the-top defenses and the ignition of flame wars.

Baller and Lisa were the same way, quick to attack on the slightest insult, whether intentional or accidental and all it led to was stress and them having to take a self-imposed time out. Now they are back and much more calm and I think the happier for it. Don't always assume a guy like Inc is picking a fight and chances are there won't be any.

-S-

 

its probavly ok anyway last time I herd he blocked me so its not that I care its just every thread he goes to he rubbs someone the wrong way and then a fight begins and i just dont want it I dont want fights or anything like that im tierd dealing with stupid people all day, i just wanna relax
and this whole thing is moving away from the point of the thread

but its nice to think that my wole paragraph you focused on 2 words