1. Hello,


    New users on the forum won't be able to send PM untill certain criteria are met (you need to have at least 6 posts in any sub forum).

    One more important message - Do not answer to people pretending to be from xnxx team or a member of the staff. If the email is not from forum@xnxx.com or the message on the forum is not from StanleyOG it's not an admin or member of the staff. Please be carefull who you give your information to.


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice

  2. Hello,


    You can now get verified on forum.

    The way it's gonna work is that you can send me a PM with a verification picture. The picture has to contain you and forum name on piece of paper or on your body and your username or my username instead of the website name, if you prefer that.

    I need to be able to recognize you in that picture. You need to have some pictures of your self in your gallery so I can compare that picture.

    Please note that verification is completely optional and it won't give you any extra features or access. You will have a check mark (as I have now, if you want to look) and verification will only mean that you are who you say you are.

    You may not use a fake pictures for verification. If you try to verify your account with a fake picture or someone else picture, or just spam me with fake pictures, you will get Banned!

    The pictures that you will send me for verification won't be public


    Best regards,

    StanleyOG.

    Dismiss Notice
PM change Verification
Page 57 of 87
  1. mstrman

    mstrman Porn Star

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2020
    Messages:
    29,919
    Oct 14, 2022
    WaPo, NY Times opinion pieces rip Jan 6. Committee as 'ineffective', 'tedious': Sermon that 'just won't end'.
    Both posts claimed the January 6th Committee is not convincing anyone new, just 'preaches to the choir'.

    jan-6th-committee-b9c2c5c0bd.jpg
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    1. toniter
      Hopefully, the Choir is the DOJ...
       
      toniter, Oct 15, 2022
      #link
      stumbler likes this.
    #1121
  2. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Oct 14, 2022
    We'll see how America rates the Nancy Antoinette star chamber when it issues it's report. Shooter predicts that it will be viewed as a political hit piece, where even rabid despicables will note that they missed a chance to bring him to justice with all of their political bullshit.

    We will never see any meaningful part of the testimony or documents the star chamber holds. Historians will judge it, but we'll not see it in our life times.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    1. View previous comments...
    2. toniter
      Well, documents don't lie (for the most part), is how the saying goes. I think the testimonies from those involved have been open and honest. After all, it is a crime to lie to congress, some have "taken the fifth", but many have been pretty revealing.... As it was said, "there is plenty of evidence to bring charges. It's not a matter of could they, but rather should they (speaking of the former president). That will be a tough decision.
       
      toniter, Oct 15, 2022
      #link
      stumbler likes this.
    3. shootersa
      But only looking at testimony and documents the star chamber minions want doj etal to see is worse than corruption.
      What could possibly justify sealing all but what they want us to see and hear?
      Why?
      Cause its all just a hit job. Justice and truth are the first victims.
       
      shootersa, Oct 16, 2022
      #link
    4. toniter
      the commission must, and certainly will, show all evidence and information gathered, to the DOJ. They won't be concealing anything. Nonetheless, the DOJ is conducting its own parallel investigation and has way more tools at its disposal than the J6 commission. Not to sweat about truth and justice just yet.
       
      toniter, Oct 16, 2022
      #link
      stumbler likes this.
    5. stumbler
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    6. shootersa
      A circus is always popular, eh?
       
      shootersa, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    #1122
  3. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    Oct 15, 2022
    So you didn't see the video of Pelosi and others calling the National Guard?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    1. stumbler
      That ridiculous and just laughable lie was exposed months ago. But now treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans have to try and deny even video evidence.
       
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    #1123
  4. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Oct 15, 2022
    <iframe width="542" height="305" src="" title="‘Plenty of evidence’ Nancy Pelosi knew and did nothing about January 6 riots" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

    The real issue is that she didn't call out the guard when she should have, eh?
    And the agenda until the J6 star chamber started leaking like a screen door on a submarine was that Nancy Antoinette wasn't in charge of security at the capital.
    What changed?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    1. View previous comments...
    2. stumbler
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
      toniter likes this.
    3. stumbler
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
      toniter likes this.
    4. stumbler
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
      toniter likes this.
    5. stumbler
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
      toniter likes this.
    6. stumbler
      See this for what it really is. Just a phony and dishonest game of @shootersa telling the same lies over and over and over again just to keep people going in nonsense circles when he undoubtedly knows better.
       
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
      toniter likes this.
    #1124
  5. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Oct 15, 2022
    There's a lot Trump coulda woulda shoulda done.
    But we'll never know the real truth because the nancy antoinette star chamber folks have grabbed everything up, sealed it from public eyes, and are only releasing the tidbits that fit their agenda.

    You understand that, right?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    1. stumbler
      And again this is just laughable and I can prove it with a simple question @shootersa will not answer.

      Hey @shootersa how many public hearings did the House and Senate intelligence committees hold when they were investigating the Trump campaign colluding with Russia?

      You remember those congressional investigations don't you? The ones where the Republican controlled Senate committee concluded. ......
       
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
      toniter likes this.
    2. stumbler
      https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/senate-panel-finds-russia-interfered-in-the-2016-us-election
       
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    #1125
  6. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    Oct 15, 2022
    I love how the narrative changes from "she didn't at all" to "she didn't do it soon enough"!

    Funny how the national guard is under state control, but Trump could have federalized them with a single phone call. It's his responsibility as commander in chief.

    Next thing you know, they'll be claiming she usurped Trump's authority by trying to call the National Guard!
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2022
    1. stumbler
      It is amazing to watch House Speaker Nancy Pelosi contact person after person and agency after agency to get the national guard to the Capitol only to be repeatedly told no.

      Until it was finally Mike Pence not Trump who ordered the guard to the Capitol.
       
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
      toniter likes this.
    #1126
  7. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Oct 15, 2022
    See, you don't get your own facts.
    From the post you so cleverly cut and edited;
    "The source said that if Trump complied with the subpoena and testified, he would "talk about how corrupt the election was, how corrupt the committee was, and how Nancy Pelosi did not call up the National Guard that Trump strongly recommended for her to do three days earlier on January 3, 2021."
    ​
    Keep trying to sell the despicable narrative. Midterms are still going to happen. You cannot stop them. You cannot win them.
     
    1. stumbler
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    2. shootersa
      Oh, you mean this "proof" ?

      "Lets clarify a few things. First, Shooter has never addressed whether Trump offered anyone troops. Shooter did address whether the house Sgt. at Arms requested troops before Jan. 6 and has shown that indeed, the subject did come up in meetings between the Sgt. at Arms, Paul Irving, the capitol police chief and the speakers office. The short answer was that they collectively decided they didn't want troops there. Now Paul Irving said he wanted them, but his request was refused by his boss, who would be Speaker Pelosi."​
       
      shootersa, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    #1127
  8. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    Oct 15, 2022
    You've not seen the video yet? It shows Nancy on the phone along with many other Congress people, including Steve Scalice who has done nothing but lie about this, and they are asking to have the National Guard sent in...

    Why would Trump ask HER to call them in, when, as the president, he could have done it himself?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    1. View previous comments...
    2. shootersa
      Keep that focus on the talking points.
      No fair thinking for yourself.
       
      shootersa, Oct 16, 2022
      #link
    3. stumbler
      It is an absolute waste of time playing @shootersa's phony and dishonest game of him just telling the same lies over and over and over again even after they are proven lies by multiple sources.

      It is nothing more than @shootersa's dishonest method of operation to just keep telling the same lies over and over and over again just to get people to waste their time engaging with him.
       
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
      anon_de_plume likes this.
    4. shootersa
      Shooter prefers not to engage with angry delusional trolls who hate America.
      Please don't bother responding to any of Shooter's posts, stumbler.
      You annoy.
       
      shootersa, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    5. anon_de_plume
      You choosing not to engage anyone still does not excuse your ignorance of facts.
       
      anon_de_plume, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    6. shootersa
      Ignorance of what facts, oh purveyor of truth and justice?
       
      shootersa, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    #1128
  9. CS natureboy

    CS natureboy Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    26,858
    Oct 15, 2022
     
    #1129
  10. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Oct 16, 2022
    Oh, you think so?
    The committee hasn't shared all of it with the DOJ yet have they? In fact, they've refused to do that, haven't they?

    The DOJ/FBI started investigating Jan. 6 on Jan. 7. So far they have identified, arrested and charged over 800 people involved in that obscenity. They have not arrested or charged anyone remotely close to the Presidents administration. For the most part they have been open and above board with their investigation and what they have learned. If the DOJ/FBI had any evidence that Trump or his administration was involved, they'd be interviewing them, don't you think? They'd be investigating that and we'd have heard about it, don't you think?
    They haven't have they?

    So, along comes Nancy Antoinette's star chamber proceeding. It operates in complete secrecy unless it wants to leak some juicy tidbit. We don't know everyone who has been called to testify. We don't know what documents or other evidence they have. We don't know what testimony they have collected. We don't know anything but what that bunch of witches want us to see and hear. And what they have let loose has mainly been focused on Trump, not on January 6. It's all been drama and carefully edited and timed to fit the 5 O'clock news schedule.

    Deplorables have requested and then demanded all of the surveillance camera footage from the capital for January 6.
    The committee has refused but has released carefully edited segments portraying our brave and honorable Nancy Antoinette stating she'll punch trump if he "trespasses" on the capital.

    Why won't the committee release all of the video?
    Why won't the committee release all of the testimony?
    Why won't the committee release all of their documents?

    Because it's a despicable witch hunt that is but one more chapter of the "get trump no matter what it takes" saga. Neither the committee or the despicables give a termite fart about getting to the bottom of the events on Jan. 6. They only want Trump.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    1. View previous comments...
    2. stumbler
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    3. shootersa
      Hey stumbler, why do you suppose the Nancy Antoinette star chamber proceeding is being so secretive? What are they hiding?
      Why do you suppose all you have is whataboutism instead of raging about all the secrecy and censorship we're seeing in Biden's administration?
      Why won't the committee share all of the testimony and documents they have?
       
      shootersa, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    4. toniter
      @shootersa... you say the J6 Commission is secretive. Well, you would think that because you never watched the hours of testimony.
       
      toniter, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
      stumbler likes this.
    5. shootersa
      Shooter does not need to watch hours of carefully choreographed and edited propaganda to have his opinions formed for him. He is fully capable of forming his own opinions.
      If you watch any of the prime time circus you realize right away just how carefully planned out it all is.
       
      shootersa, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    6. stumbler
      This is just hilarious. One the J6 committee is conducting their investigation just like all other committees to with the exception of holding EIGHT public hearings including some in prime time. More than 20 million people watched the last one. So @shootersa is simply inventing claims of secrecy when there are many better examples of treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans hiding behind secrecy.

      But the height of hilarity is @shootersa trying to claim what the J6 committee is or is not doing when he admits he hasn't even watched the hearings,

      Which I doubt he would even have the courage to do. Because if he had @shootersa would know there is no possible way he can accuse the investigation of being a partisan witch hunt because they have not had one Democrat as a witness yet, Every witness they have had are either Republicans or former members of the Trump administration.

      So the fraud @shootersa is running here is both obvious and laughable.
       
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    #1130
  11. stumbler

    stumbler Porn Star

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    106,322
    Oct 17, 2022
    Jan. 6 committee member says they have questions about advice witnesses were given the DOJ will be interested in

    Sarah K. Burris
    October 16, 2022


    [​IMG]
    House select committee official photo.


    Speaking to Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) on Sunday, CNN's Pamela Brown asked about former Secret Service Agent and former Trump White House aide Tony Ornato, who spoke to the House Select Committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on Congress and the attempt to overthrow the election in March 2022.

    Since then, former Mark Meadows aide Cassidy Hutchinson revealed several things that Ornato told her about what happened on Jan. 6 that it seems Ornato didn't say to the House Select Committee. Ornato's lawyer told CNN that the committee hasn't asked him to come back and testify about the things that Hutchinson said.

    "He will be," said Lofgren. "You know, we had a lot of questions, but we wanted to get through all the documentary evidence that we have now been provided, over a million documents. So, it took a lot of time to go through that. We have successfully gone through it. And now we're in a position — in the very near future — to call the witnesses from the Secret Service back in for a few additional questions."

    Hutchinson testified that Ornato told her Trump lunged at the Secret Service driver when he was told he wasn't going to lead his rally crowd to the Capitol. In the month that followed, behind the scenes, "sources" inside the Secret Service denied the take by Hutchinson.

    “Ornato is a red herring,” a Secret Service source claimed in a comment to The Hill this summer. The source claimed Ornato was in his office and not at the rally.

    “There are three people in that vehicle: Bobby Engel, President Trump and the limo driver,” the source claimed both agents are “saying that did not happen.”

    In truth, however, a Washington, D.C. officer backed up Hutchinson's details of the incident.

    "It's not just about the incident, but the testimony and I will say, we have broad questions about the advice given to some witnesses and whether all the witnesses were completely candid with the committee and that's something that we're interested in and I think the Department of Justice will be very interested in," Lofgren told CNN.

    "So, it sounds like what you're saying is you have evidence of witness tampering?" asked Brown.

    Lofgren said she couldn't go into it.

    See the interview below:




    https://www.rawstory.com/january-6-tony-ornato-lofgren/
     
    #1131
  12. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Oct 17, 2022
    Shooter's opinion is based on the activities of the Nancy Antoinette star chamber proceeding. That a congressional committee can hold secret hearings, refuse to release even witness lists, not to mention refusing to release testimony or documents, is dispositive of what we've come to in politics.

    Can you tell me the last time a congressional committee engaged in this level of secrecy?
    Why do they need this level of secrecy?
    What are they trying to hide from us?
    Why are we only hearing the testimony and witnesses that pillory Trump?

    If you need some kind of proof about what the committee is up to, look no further than Stumblers latest posts telling us about the "bombshell" news coming out of the committee.

    Shooters English teacher was a frumpy old maid. She did not give Shooter an F, but she did give him a C. Shooter deserved better.

    Shooters civics teacher would give Shooter an A+. His name was Ted Strickland. He taught at East High School in Denver, Colorado when Shooter attended. He also served in the Colorado Legislature and as Lieutenant governor. You can look him up. Shooter recalls him all but foaming at the mouth at students who tried to justify secrecy in government.

    Another civics teacher Shooter had was Regis Groff. You can look him up as well. Regis once told Shooter that the biggest enemy of democracy was secrecy, censorship and unrestricted power. The Nancy Antoinette star chamber proceeding is utilizing all three.
     
    1. View previous comments...
    2. shootersa
      That is NOT what shooter said. He said he prefers STEM and government sources over news sources.
      He watched enough of the first hearing to see what it was. A political hit job.
      Remember when the secret service immediately refuted hutchinson?
      Shooter said IF the agents testified we'd never hear it.
      Haven't testified have they?
      Haven't even been subpoenaed.
       
      shootersa, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    3. shootersa
      And did you know the agents did testify earlier?
      So did hutchinson.
      Wanna see what their testimony was?
      So would DOJ.

      Secrecy censure absolute power.
       
      shootersa, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    4. toniter
      Maybe I'll go back to your statement. You called ALL media propaganda, left and right. I then asked you where you get your trusted information and you told me government and STEM sources. I needed you to tell me what STEM sources are. Are you trying to wiggle out of that now?
       
      toniter, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    5. shootersa
      Your memory isn't so good then.
      Asked and answered..
      Science technology engineering math.

      Shooters opinion about the nancy antoinette star chamber has been formed by:
      The circus of forming the committee and its "charge" from nancy.
      The secrecy that started right away, mainly their refusal to hold open hearings, identify witnesses.
      The convenient leaks.
      The interviews with members who would say "can't tell you specifics but we have proof of ..."
      The prime time circus performances.
       
      shootersa, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    6. shootersa
      The committee refusal to release all of the security footage from jan. 6 even with foia demands.
      The refusal of the committee to share much of the documentation.

      The so careful editing of everything the committee releases, either as a leak or otherwise.

      Using the token deplorables as front men(women) for the press spots.

      Need me to go on?

      America is being conned by nancy and her minions in shooters opinion.
       
      shootersa, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    #1132
  13. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Oct 17, 2022
    You mean this video?
    If you go to about 3 minutes, you can hear Nancy threatening to punch Trump, and she's even willing to go to jail! How can we fail as a nation with such brave and mature leaders!!

    <iframe width="677" height="381" src="" title="'I'm gonna punch him out': Pelosi fumes over Trump's Jan. 6 speech" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
    1. View previous comments...
    2. shootersa
      Remember the screeching from the despicables when he said that?
      Where's the outrage now?

      But yeah, Shooter would like to see that corrupt old witch take a poke at Trump.
      Trump would laugh so hard she'd be able to get a couple swings in.
      Shooter doubts Trump would even notice.
       
      shootersa, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    3. toniter
      If she had the chance, she'd put a knee in his balls. He wouldn't be laughing.
       
      toniter, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    4. shootersa
      She peobably couldn't get her knee that high:p

      Seriously.
      You can see the hypocrisy of despicables who twirled and stamped their feet at trump but now give Nancy sainthood for saying she'd go all gangsta on trump?
       
      shootersa, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    5. toniter
      Not really. trump was standing tall and proud in front of thousands of his supporters when he told them to kick the shit out of a heckler and he'd pay for the legal bills. Pelosi was hiding from rioters with others pleading for law enforcement support. She knew trump was doing nothing to call off his dogs.
       
      toniter, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    6. shootersa
      Of course.
      That makes it all OK.
      Trump was standing tall and proud!
      Nancy was in fear for her life and the nation!

      We find that smoking gun we been promised yet?
      Maybe that decoder ring? That would do it, eh?

      Remember when schiff said he had seen absolute proof of trumps conspiracy with Putin?
      Maybe the smoking gun is with the russian thingy proof.
       
      shootersa, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    #1133
  14. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Oct 17, 2022
    And lest anyone think this is a bit of fluff prepared for mid terms, one should keep in mind that the "documentary" on Nancy was made by Nancy's daughter.
     
    #1134
  15. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Oct 17, 2022
    Mueller finds no proof of Trump collusion with Russia; AG Barr says evidence 'not sufficient' to prosecute (nbcnews.com)
    Special counsel Robert Mueller found no proof that President Donald Trump criminally colluded with Russia and reached no conclusion about whether Trump obstructed justice, Attorney General William Barr told Congress on Sunday, while also announcing that he found insufficient evidence to pursue the matter further.

    The bombshell findings were contained in a letter that Barr sent to lawmakers summarizing Mueller's report and that was made public.


    Barr quoted Mueller's report, which he said stated: "(T)he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
     
    1. View previous comments...
    2. shootersa
      So then, trump didn't conspire with russia.
      The russian thingy was a hoax.
       
      shootersa, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    3. stumbler
      stumbler, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
      toniter likes this.
    4. stumbler
      I would think anyone who actually read the Mueller report would know he said:

      https://rollcall.com/2019/04/19/mueller-says-messaging-apps-likely-destroyed-trump-russia-evidence/
       
      stumbler, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    5. stumbler
      And people who read the Mueller report know one of the main reasons they could not establish enough evidence to indict people for criminal conspiracy is because witnesses lied and destroyed evidence.

      https://rollcall.com/2019/04/19/mueller-says-messaging-apps-likely-destroyed-trump-russia-evidence/
       
      stumbler, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    6. stumbler
      People who have actually read the Mueller report also know that the only reason Mueller declined to charge Don Jr with criminal conspiracy is because he said he was too ignorant to know he was committing a felony when he eagerly took the meeting with the Russian spies hoping to get dirt on Hillary Clinton from them.

      Which was kind of a first for me because where I live ignorance of the law is no excuse. But according to Mueller it is when it comes to Trump's kids.
       
      stumbler, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    #1135
  16. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    Oct 17, 2022
    1. shootersa
      ah. Shooter sees the problem.
      Shooter says; "The committee hasn't shared all of it with the DOJ yet have they?
      And anon wants to change it to; "And what proof do you have that they have refused to share anything with the DOJ?"

      You see, the committee is sharing their information with America, you know, cause publicly televised prime time circus acts, and there have been those carefully edited and orchestrated leaks, eh?

      But getting only what the committee wants us to see, or for that matter what they want the DOJ to see, isn't the whole story is it? And the question becomes, what is it they don't want us to see?

      You can see the problem now, right?
       
      shootersa, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    2. anon_de_plume
      You have no clue what is actually happening. This is you making shit up!
       
      anon_de_plume, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    #1136
  17. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Oct 17, 2022
    1. View previous comments...
    2. stumbler
      If the J6 committee was simply working hand and glove with the DOJ and handing over everything they had @shootersa would be screaming its all just one big conspiracy between the committee and Merrick Garland to get his Chosen One Traitor Trump.

      But thanks for linking a RAWSTOIRY article. I got a special laugh our of that.
       
      stumbler, Oct 17, 2022
      #link
    3. shootersa
      Well, in Shooter's opinion 30 31 32 33 34 35 investigations over 7 years with not a single indictment of Trump, no trial, no guilty verdict, no jail time, and especially no perp walk is indeed indicative of a conspiracy to get trump, no matter what it takes.

      What do you think, @stumbler?
      Is Trump really that innocent, or are his persecutors really that incompetent?
       
      shootersa, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    4. stumbler
      This is another one of your lies you just telling over and over again. I have the proven that many times.
       
      stumbler, Oct 19, 2022
      #link
    5. stumbler
      .
       
      stumbler, Oct 19, 2022
      #link
    6. stumbler
      .
       
      stumbler, Oct 19, 2022
      #link
    #1137
  18. anon_de_plume

    anon_de_plume Porn Star

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2012
    Messages:
    50,169
    Oct 17, 2022
    You really think she was serious about actually punching Trump?

    And for all the violence Trump has urged, that you would get upset that others might express their frustration is just too funny.

    Your hypocrisy is full on display!
     
    • Like Like x 2
    1. View previous comments...
    2. toniter
      @Scotchlass, I was thinking how so many politicians and those following politics twist and change words to demonize their opponents, ie disinfectant vs bleach, as you say. It's frustrating for all of us. You say anon claimed trump suggested drinking bleach. Sorry, I don't find where anon said that. Can you point it out to me, please?
       
      toniter, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
      anon_de_plume likes this.
    3. stumbler
      This is a really interesting diversion @Scotchlass. The reply was about Nancy Peloci wanting to punch Trump in the face for inciting an armed insurrection while the Capitol was under attack by his domestic terrorists.

      And then just out of the blue you come up with ....


      ....
      That is one of the biggest leaps to a derail I've seen in a very long time.
       
      stumbler, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
      toniter likes this.
    4. stumbler
      But if you are going to do that let's at least get the facts straight. Here's the exact quote.

      https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/apr/24/context-what-donald-trump-said-about-disinfectant-/
       
      stumbler, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
      toniter likes this.
    5. stumbler
      Trump did not say to drink bleach. But since he was as always just babbling nonsense thinking it made him look smart his cult followers took it that way and poisonings from ingesting disinfectants skyrocketed.

      https://time.com/5835244/accidental-poisonings-trump/

      The result of a literally and clinically mentally ill president babbling incoherent nonsense instead of just listening to the health experts and scientists. Which resulted in hundreds of thousands unnecessary COVID deaths. A few of them from ingesting disinfectants.
       
      stumbler, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
      toniter likes this.
    6. Scotchlass
      To both @tonite and @Anon,
      And I replied, You really think Trump wanted people to drink bleach?
      This was incorrect, and I admitted this. Democrats mocked Trump for the disinfectant thing, but it was Biden who said Trump said it was bleach.
      My reply to @Anon was a direct reference to the lengths of which political opponents will go to demonize each other.
      @Anon was pointing out the ridiculousness of Pelosi punching out Trump.
      I was doing the same thing with the Dems suggestions that Trump actually meant people should go to the local grocery store to get disinfectant to IV.
       
      Scotchlass, Oct 19, 2022
      #link
    7. View next comments...
    #1138
  19. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Oct 17, 2022
    Poor anon. He missed Shooter's humor and sarcasm again.
    Wonder did he watch the whole thing, even the part about the National Guard?
    It's quite long, almost 5 minutes.
     
    1. anon_de_plume
      Yawn!
       
      anon_de_plume, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
      stumbler likes this.
    2. shootersa
      Shoulda watched the whole thing.
       
      shootersa, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    #1139
  20. shootersa

    shootersa Frisky Feline

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    84,743
    Oct 17, 2022
    Well, tell you what there @stumbler, if you have access to the Nancy Antoinette star chamber witness roster, the transcripts of all testimony given, and all the documents and other evidence it has in hand, share that with us, would you?
    Heck we could even give it to the DOJ. Cause, see, they aren't getting it all either.
    DOJ: Jan. 6 committee’s refusal to share transcripts ‘complicates’ investigation | The Hill
    Reminder: the J6 committee altered and leaked evidence | CPAC (conservative.org)
    DOJ felt ‘blindsided’ by Hutchinson testimony J6 committee had not provided them: NYT - Raw Story - Celebrating 18 Years of Independent Journalism

    As far as the investigation into the trump/russian thingy, we do have this to start with .......
    Russia Investigation Transcripts and Documents | Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (house.gov)

    After House Intel Report, Here’s a List of All the Trump-Russia Investigations - Roll Call
     
    1. stumbler
      .
       
      Last edited: Oct 18, 2022
      stumbler, Oct 18, 2022
      #link
    #1140
Page 57 of 87