A quick look on the internet garnered this information about Unintended Consequences:

"Those of you, and there seem to be many, who have endowed this book with five stars should be aware that Timothy McVeigh, the convicted Oklahoma City bomber, has embraced it totally, calling it his "New Testament." (See "American Terrorist, Timothy McVeigh and the Oklahoma City Bombing.") Perhaps you should be more careful whose ideas you choose to espouse. This book is the manifesto for every delusional paranoid who honestly believes the government is about to knock on his door and take away all his guns before enslaving him and selling his wife and daughters into white slavery. It was this very same set of delusions that led McVeigh to take the lives of 168 innocent people, including 19 babies, on that April morning in 1995. It sends shivers down my spine to know that Timothy McVeigh has so many kindred spirits out there, some of whom probably dream of carrying on his "work." View this book as the paranoid trash that it is."

And this:

"This was Timothy McVeigh's favorite book. Maybe that may be a good endorsement to some, it certainly is not for me.
Basically the book's plot is an elaborate justification for a group of people to go on a terroristic sniper campaign against cardboard 'evil' government officials.
It is an inadvertant indightment of the violent mindset of the extreme rightwing, who see their enemies through a simple black or white lens and view the probable resolution of the 2nd amendment debate in similiarely starkly violent terms.
It is a sick irony that the simplisticly atavistic mindset of those who enjoy this book is so similar to that of Muslim fundamentalism, given the fact that that movements is so uniquely despised by the american right.
Amazon should have some sort of 'Health Warning' for reader reviews. Who's really going to bother finishing a book they hate, let alone right a review on a website about one? if you are going to the bother of writing a review its way more likely your going to encourage others to read it then warn them off it.
Personally, I finished the book because I found it darkly fascinating and unintentionally hilarious in its ignorant and narrow-minded representation of these issues and the world in general.
On reading the reader reviews I was shocked to find only raves from gun-fanatics so Im writing this to warn anyone naive enough to go looking for this book thinking that its a fair representation of the issues it purports to deal with. It is not."

Unintended Consequences sounds suspiciously like The Turner Diaries.

 

book they hate, let alone right a review on a website about one?

Did you "right" this, doggo? Or did ya get it off Vanity Fair?

 

It's really leftist to denounce the reading of a book because a bad guy read it.

If that were a reading is FUNdamental requirement, we couldn't even read dear abby, or Dilbert.

 

Go back and read my post. I said I got it from the internet.

https://www.amazon.com/Unintended-C...r&reviewerType=all_reviews#reviews-filter-bar

 

It seems you didn't get it. There is no scientific meaning of Cro-Magnon Man. The term, and the concept to which you refer, does not exist in the scientific literature.

 

Not true. Everyone knows that the Cro-Magnons were in truth the blended hybrid decendants of the Battlestar Galactica fleet and the Cylon rebels that joined them after the final battle at the Colony.

 

You probably also believe that "Race is only a social construct."

Those who maintain this also maintain that the non race of Negroes deserves affirmative action policies and even reparations.

DNA evidence taken from Neanderthal and Cro Magnon fossils demonstrates that they were of the same species. Nevertheless, they were more different genetically than any of the existing races, which nevertheless are still different genetically.

 

Ah! So, we have a genetic definition of "Negro".
Finally!
Please, Dog, enlighten us.
What is the genetic definition of "Negro".
Don't forget to include sources in your response; Shooter will need to see them.

Oh, and have the scientific boys figured out, at what point is a "Negro" not a "Negro", you know, for the whole mixed race issue. We have to be able to clearly identify who is black, and who is a mutt.

 

Quick Answer
Most anthropologists recognize that there are four major race classifications in the world, which include caucasian, mongoloid or asian, negroid or black and australoid. The race classification was created by Carleston S. Coon in 1962. The four major races can then be further subdivided into 30 subgroups

 

According to the scientific consensus, based on fossil evidence and DNA evidence, modern humans emerged in Africa about 100,000 years ago. About 60,000 years ago one hundred to several hundred of these modern humans entered Asia, probably crossing the Sinai Peninsula. On the other side of the Sinai Peninsula these modern humans encountered different population pressures, so they evolved differently.

A Negro is descended from the modern humans who remained in Africa 100,000 years ago.

Negritos look similar to Negroes. Nigritos live in South East Asia, although in limited numbers.

The aboriginal inhabitants of New Guinea and Australia also look similar to Negroes.

Nevertheless, the Nigritos and the aboriginal inhabitants of New Guinea and Australia are very different genetically than Negroes. By that I mean that they have different allele frequencies. This is easy to demonstrate from DNA analysis.

 

In 1977, OMB issued the Race and Ethnic Standards for Federal Statistics and Administrative Reporting that are set forth in Statistical Policy Directive No. 15. The standards in this Directive have been used for almost two decades throughout the Federal government for recordkeeping, collection, and presentation of data on race and Hispanic origin. The standards have been used in two decennial censuses and in surveys of the population, data collections necessary for meeting statutory requirements associated with civil rights monitoring and enforcement, and in other administrative program reporting

 

The word 'Caucasian' comes from 'Kavkas', who is believed, according to ancient legends, to be the forefather of the Vainakh-speaking people (the Chechens, Ingush and Georgian Kist people), all of whom trace their ethnic origins to the Caucasus mountains, mainly along the North and South Caucasus regions. In essence, it means that either 'Kavkas' could have come from 'Caucasus' or vice versa.
The exact place of origin of the Caucasians is a matter of debate among anthropologists but most seem to agree with the aforementioned theory. The Caucasoids are further classified into various sub races such as Aryans (including some Indo-European populations), Semitic (Arabs, Hebrew speaking people), Hamitic (Berber-Cushitic-Egyptian native races), Nordic, Mediterranean, Dinaric, Alpine, Arabid, East Baltic, Turanid, Iranid and Armenoid. These sub races are primarily based upon geographic location and language. The Caucasian race and all its sub races are characterized by light skin color ranging from white to dark wheatish, straightish to wavy hair with color ranging from flaxen to brownish to dark ebony, prominent eyes, pronounced and well-shaped nose and sharp features, medium built and average to stocky musculature. Owing to the very cold conditions of the place of its origin, the Caucasian race has light and sparse skin pigmentation and, as a result, they are not very well suited to living in very hot equatorial climates and are ill-suited to remain exposed to strong sunlight for long.



NegroidThomas Huxley, the prominent Darwinian biologist, believed that Aborigines, Papuans, Negritos, and Melanesians should be categorized under the Australoid race, although a lot of his predecessors and contemporaries were unanimous about inclusion of these sub-races under the Negroid race.
The Negro race is subdivided into sub races such as Aborigines, Melanesians, Negritos, Papuans, Dravidians, etc. People belonging to the Negroid race are physically characterized by dark skin due to dense pigmentation, coarse black and wooly hair, wide noses and foreheads, broad, often thick lips, large built and broad skeletal structure. The Negro race people are known for their stamina and ability to survive in very adverse environmental conditions, especially extreme heat. The dense pigmentation of their skin equips them to face the intense heat and strong sun of the equatorial belt of the earth, which is where this race is believed to have originated. Even today, the maximum number of Negroid race people can be found in the equatorial regions such as Africa, Southern India, etc. Negroid sub-races also include the following:-~ The Nilotic people~ The Bantu race~ The Sudanic race~ The Pygmy people~ The Khoisan people
MongoloidDue to the vast and diverse geographical distribution of the Mongolian race, the term "Mongoloid" seems more appropriate than "Asian", as an umbrella term to refer to people belonging to this race.

The Mongoloid race include all those people who are classified under the sub races East Asian, North Asian and Native American. Mongoloids are characterized by yellowish or light wheatish skin, extremely straight and black hair, very less hair growth upon their bodies, small, almond-shaped eyes, slight built and very lean musculature. The facial features are usually small but clear. The regions of the world that are regarded as the homelands of Mongoloid race people are the far Orients, Northeastern India, certain American countries where Native American people can still be found, etc. The Mongoloid race can be classified into - the Neo-Mongoloids, which include ethic groups like Eskimos, Buryats, Chinese, and Chukchis. These groups have physical features that are extremely Mongoloid in appearance and are typically found in Mongoloid populations that have adapted to living in extremely low temperatures and cold climatic conditions. The second category is the Paleo-Mongoloids, which include ethnic groups such as Polynesians, Filipinos, Burmese, certain Native American people, Jōmons, etc. The physical features of these ethnic and genetic groups are less Mongoloid in appearance and such features are usually found in Mongolian populations whose lifestyles are adapted for living in warm to temperate climatic conditions over several generations.



AustraloidAccording to the 'Out of Africa Theory', Proto-Australoids (believed to be ancestors of the Australoid races) are thought to have migrated from the African continent and moved along the Southeast Asian coast towards the Australian landmass
The Aborigines, Melanesians, Papuans, and Negritos come under the Australoid race. In short, the original native races local to the Australian subcontinent come under this category. Most anthropologists debate the distinctiveness of this race as they believe that sub races like Aborigines, Negritos, etc., are genetically and physiologically very close to the Negroid race. This belief conforms to the Out of Africa theory. This could be the reason behind the racial similarities between the Australian aborigines and the native inhabitants of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands in the Indian Ocean. Hence, many anthropologists and genetic biologists believe that these should be categorized as sub races of the Negroid race. Therefore, it is believed that the Australoid race is a classification of humanity which is based upon geographical location and regional culture rather than genetic and biological traits.

 

Excellent copy and paste.
Unfortunately, it doesn't help us genetically define "race".
How is Shooter supposed to know if he's dealing with a "Negro" or a Jew, or a Mexican?

 

Why should you worry about it? You are the one who does not believe in races.
If you are being robbed there is one that is much more likely to be pointing the gun at you.
If you are trying to borrow there is one more likely to have the money you need.
And if you want a job done for a cheap price there is one that will likely fill the bill.

There has always been races of people. There is an organization that decided we should not call them that. I will let you look up the name of the organization.

 

Even if the differences are minor, they exist and so can be used to tell someone's race from their DNA. In fact, the FBI used a genetic test to figure out that a serial killer in Louisiana was black and not white, as they had initially thought. This helped the FBI redirect their efforts and catch the serial killer.

 

Please notice scientists can tell a new species of great ape. What makes people think they cannot do the same thing with humans and the same thing could not have happened with the human species?

The great ape, found in the Batang Toru area of North Sumatra, Indonesia, was only a rumor until 1997, when scientists caught their first glimpse of one, and it wasn’t until 2013 that researchers were able to obtain the skull of one of the animals. Only now, after years of research, are they confident that the Tapanuli’s behavior and genetic characteristics — consistent differences in its skull and teeth — distinguish it from the Sumatran orangutan, making it a unique species.


"The Batang Toru orangutans appear to be direct descendants of the initial orangutans that had migrated from mainland Asia, and thus constitute the oldest evolutionary line within the genus Pongo," said Alexander Nater of the University of Zurich, in a statement. "The Batang Toru population was connected to populations to the north until 10,000 or 20,000 years ago, after which it became isolated."

"It isn't an everyday event that we find a new species of great ape, so indeed the discovery is very exciting," said the study’s senior author, Michael Krutzen of the University of Zurich in Switzerland.

 

Books like The Catcher in the Rye would like a word with you regarding "leftist" book bannings....

 

Can you tell me exactly what the point of this post is?

What does an article about great apes have to do with the race of human beings?

 

How come you're going to keep engaging DL about his racism when msman got this:

 

"Niggers is violent and stupid".

- shootersa

You're the one who keeps saying that, not me, and not msman.

My opinion of Negroes is nuanced, and based on facts I document. You distort my opinion in order to make it easy to refute, but you are not refuting my opinion, but your distortion of it.