Now first I readily admit I do not waste my time responding to your childish insults and name calling and only do respond to you or quote you when I think there is a valid point to make. Or when you make just a stupid false charge that I hide my reply to you by replying to someone else when I actually addressed my reply directly to you as noted below.

And finally FeltPlay there are just plain liars and then there are really delusional liars like you that say bullshit as stupid as me ever voting for Bush. I have been a very proud progressive/liberal/Democrat for more than 35 years and while I have never voted a straight party ticket in my life I sure never claimed to be a Republican after I took up the fight against the lie of conservatism back in about 1981 and damned sure never voted for a Bush in my life.

You and reality just never travel in the same circles do you?

 

You remain the delusional liar. I admitted to being a Republican until I was about 30 years-old and went into the newspaper business. That's when I happened to read the Constitution of the United States of America saw what genius it was and how badly the conservative/Republicans had rigged the game against everyone except the rich and have been a very proud progressive/liberal/Democrat ever since. And I am 65 now so that was 35 years ago.

But just to prove what a stupid lie you are trying to tell here where in the fuck do you come up with your claim I ever voted for Bush?

Just stupid.

Nope, again just a stupid lie and all anyone has to do is look at the time stamps on your comments to know that beyond a reasonable doubt. They are right above this.

Again just a really stupid lie. I am on record many, many places explaining that when I was first injured/disabled in 1995 I went back to college got an AA in education and am only 15 credit hours short of BA in education. But another oilfield boom came a long and I could make way more money working in the oilfield than I could teaching so even with my disability I went to back to work in the oilfield. Until I got a second disabling injury in my neck that threatened to paralyze me so then I did take disability but by that time I was almost 60 years old.

This is true. The back of my left shoulder was paralyzed in 1995 and I have had limited mobility in my left arm ever since. My right shoulder has detached tendons and rotator cuff so torn they don't think it can be repaired. And I have a tungsten plate in my neck holding my cervical spine together. And I have not had a day without pain since January -- 1995. So yes I am busted up.

Well no this is a lie. I've got a wife of nearly 45 years that loves me and still fucks me. We've got kids and grandkids who all love each other and will be having a great time over Christmas and New Years.

We own everything we have including our house and that garage you don't think exists and a nice little hideaway place up on the mountain we can retreat to.

Also as just a bonus as far as I am concerned in 1980 I walked off a drilling rig and with no formal college education back them published and edited my own little general circulation newspaper for nearly 10 years and I left it but the newspaper is still being published to this very day. And that's where I won those awards for fighting the lie of conservatism as it is preached and practiced in this nation.

And that is sure successful enough for me.

No that would be you. Just look at the hate, anger and bitterness in your posts.

And your last statement is a perfect example of it.

And PS Its not even like I am telling you my whole life's story because its all been told before somewhere in those more than 40,000 posts of mine.

 

On the daily show, the showed a Trump supporter saying that 9/11 was Obama's fault because he wasn't in the white house when it happened. No more words need to be said.

 

Ok once he was called out for bluffing Felt play did try to save face and run to another thread claiming he was answering as soon as he saw it but the time stamps show he was already responding to calling his bluff on this thread about 30 minutes before he claims he saw it. But none he less lets take a look at it.

But this is simply an obvious lie. Trump constantly threatens to sue people who offend him. But its only I lying bluff because he did what he is accused of and he can not afford to get on the witness stand under oath for all he does is make childish bluffs. Just like you.

It is Trump who nakes the bluster in bluffs and then doesn't follow though. Just like threatening to sue the women who assused him of sexual assualt,

 

Trump's aides also said earlier he remains committed to his underlying swamp-draining policies, such as banning outgoing Trump transition and administration members from lobbying for five years. Trump also prohibits any lobbyists from joining his transition team or administration unless they de-register.

"President-elect Trump's ethics reform policies are full speed ahead," transition spokesman Jason Miller said. "We're going to change the way business is done in Washington and start putting the American people first."

Furthermore, Lewandowski has no official title or connection to Trump, as his comments have no real meaning.

 

"...of the rich, by the rich, for the rich!"

 

What type of afflicition do you posses that hinders you from becoming wealthy?

 

from reading years of his posts....

I would say major negativity......

 

Good call....anon-sugar plum sure has a good share of pessimism.

 

While you people yammer on at each other will endless insults and false accusations the revolution is moving right along.
The goal of the revolution is to drive the robbers from Washington. Take away their special programs and self serving treatment. Get them paying attention to the peoples business, not their own.

A question for all;
Why does Congress deserve a separate, special pension and medical plan? Why isn't Social Security good enough for them, if it's good enough for the rest of us?

 

I have always had a problem with that.....

Really pissed me off when the govt workers where exempted from Obamacare.....

My biggest problem is they are allowed to use "insiders trading" tactics....

 

Wow! Lincoln just sat up in his grave...

 

They dont deserve any special treatment.

Every last one of them shit the same way I do.

So, what is it exactly that you propose the people do to stop this special set of programs for the government?

 

First, vote the robbers out.
Simple test; determine the net worth of your elected officials when they got the job. Then, determine their net worth during the next election. If they have done better than the national average, we know they have been taking care of their business, not our business. Vote the fuckers out.
Keep doing this until Congress is taking care of our business, not theirs.
Second; Ask Congress why they and government employees need a separate pension and medical plan from the rest of us. Keep asking until they get the message. One plan would be to require all new government and elected officials to participate only in Social Security. As we vote the fuckers out, new members will be in Social Security, old ones will suck off of their private, special plan, but no matter. Eventually we'll drive that special program into the gutter where it belongs.
Same with the medical plan.
Same with any other special programs they have, like the exemption from insider trading laws.

 

What does that mean?

 

means what it says...what part dont you understand?

 

April 04, 2012
FACT SHEET: The STOCK Act: Bans Members of Congress from Insider Trading

Today, the President signed into law the STOCK Act, a bipartisan bill that prevents Members of Congress from trading stocks based on nonpublic information they gleaned on Capitol Hill. While this is a good first step, the President will continue to work with Congress to do even more to help fight the destructive influence of money in politics and rebuild the trust between Washington and the American people.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Congress Quickly And Quietly Rolls Back Insider Trading Rules For Itself;

Of course, here we are in 2013 and, lo and behold, it is no longer an election year.

Congress had to act, and within months they had passed the STOCK Act with overwhelming support in Congress to make insider trading laws that apply to everyone else finally apply to Congress and Congressional staffers as well.

So... with very little fanfare, Congress quietly rolled back a big part of the law late last week. Specifically the part that required staffers to post disclosures about their financial transactions, so that the public could make sure there was no insider trading going on. Congress tried to cover up this fairly significant change because they, themselves, claimed that it would pose a "national risk" to have this information public. A national risk to their bank accounts.

It was such a national risk that Congress did the whole thing quietly, with no debate. The bill was introduced in the Senate on Thursday and quickly voted on late that night when no one was paying attention. Friday afternoon (the best time to sneak through news), the House picked it up by unanimous consent. The House ignored its own promise to give Congress three days to read a bill before holding a vote, because this kind of thing is too important to let anyone read the bill before Congress had to pass it.