Typical.
Whatever it takes, blame deplorables.
30 31 32 33 34 35 investigations. 7 years.
No trump perp walk
No trump indictments
No trump prison time

So whaddya think, silky?
Is trump that innocent or are the prosecutors that incompetent?

 

"The wheels of justice turn slowly, but grind exceedingly fine."

 

For one brief moment after the J6 armed insurrection and attempted coup they did turn on Trump. And even talked about removing him from office using the 25th amendment. But all Trump had to do was threaten to start his own party and that was enough to make them reverse and start kissing his ass, sucking his cock, and taking it up the ass again.

Which is what makes the treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans. Because they do not give a shit about the Constitution they swore to uphold or the United States of America. The only thing they care about is their own will to power and swear allegiance to just one man for it.

That is one of @shootersa's favorite pieces of false propaganda. He ignores the fact that Trump managed to corrupt the entire federal government and the treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans in Congress to protect him from the investigations and the phony DOJ position a sitting president cannot be indicted. As well as the fact Trump was proven beyond reasonable doubt guilty of the crimes he was charged with in his two impeachments but again the treasonous conservative/America Hating/Republicans in the Senate refused to convict him.

 

We finally understand the despicable hate and anger

 

Hey trumptards

 

Jim Jordan hits back after FBI denies his allegations of a conservative 'purge': 'Are you kidding me?'
FBI denies Jordan's claims they've retaliated against whistleblowers and purged conservative employees

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, called out the FBI's purge of conservatives on "The Faulkner Focus" Friday and accused the Justice Department of retaliating against whistleblowers who come forward with information. The FBI hit back at Jordan's allegations, calling them "false and misleading."

JIM JORDAN: Established policies and procedures, are you kidding me? In the past several weeks, they've raided the home of a former president, taking the phone of a sitting member of Congress, and we saw what they did to the pastor and his family and seven children: 20 agents, guns drawn, going to his house, when the local officials said there was no crime whatsoever. So established policies, you've got to be kidding me. So that's what's going on at the FBI. And now what's happening is the people who are brave enough to take whistleblower status and come talk to us, they're coming after them. And remember when it started. It started a few weeks ago when Merrick Garland sent out a memorandum to everyone in the Justice Department [on] here are the rules and guidelines for when you talk to Congress. It was a memo to chill their speech. And since that, we've learned of people's security clearances being revoked and now suspensions for FBI whistleblowers who've come to us. So if that's not retaliation, tell me what it is. Because it sure looks that way. I'm sure they got some something they're going to say that, oh, it's not. But that's what it appears to the American people to be. That's certainly what it appears to us and our lawyers to be.

 

Yeah, assaulting a 72 year old man is nothing at all... All while obstructing access to a clinic in violation of federal law...

 

Most people allow their likes and dislikes to influence their judgement of what is true and false. I do it too, but I try not to.

My posts are frequently controversial, and even provocative. Nevertheless they are courteous, fact based, and logical. When someone says I am wrong, or even guilty of lying, I ask politely, "What did I say that is not true?"

If my detractors replies, "Everything you said is not true."

When I respond courteously, "Then it should be easy for you to find one untrue statement I made. Quote it. Let's discuss it."

At this point my detractor either disappears or responds with insults, name calling, and obscene words. These demonstrate that he has nothing to say, and I have won the argument. It is impossible to disagree with the Master of Facts, because everything he says is true.

 

Trump lawyer privately trashing his colleagues for making the former president's legal woes worse: report

Tom Boggioni
October 01, 2022



Donald Trump (Photo by Mandel Ngan for AFP)


Deep in a report on the turmoil among Donald Trump's lawyers battling over legal strategy, with the former president possibly facing Espionage Act and obstructions charges, the Washington Post is reporting that one Trump attorney is privately complaining to associates about his colleagues whom he believes are exacerbating the president's precarious legal position.

The report notes that high-priced Trump attorney Christopher Kise -- who landed a $3 million retainer to join the legal team -- has been battling with the rest of the team over strategy and was so dissatisfied with a legal filing they submitted that he reportedly refused to sign it.

The report adds that Kise, who has been described as being4 "sidelined" by the rest of the team, has expressed dismay over the rest of the team's lack of experience for the task at hand.

RELATED: The door to remove Judge Aileen Cannon from the Trump case is now 'wide open': former prosecutor

According to the Post, "Even as Kise has urged moderation, his rivals have pushed Trump to maintain an aggressive stance — in part because they believe combativeness plays well with supporters and could force welcome delays. Some of Trump’s other lawyers also have badmouthed Kise to the former president, saying he is not a team player."

'In private, those familiar with the conversations say, Kise has questioned the wisdom and experience of some of his colleagues, arguing that they do not have extensive experience with this type of litigation — and could face legal trouble themselves," the report states before adding, "He [Kise] also argued privately that their counsel had deepened Trump’s problems and that they would have had fewer problems had he started representing Trump earlier in the summer."

"Whether those lawyers were, in fact, acting on specific instructions from their client, the former president, is not yet clear," the Post cautioned.

You can read more here.



https://www.rawstory.com/trump-lawyer-turmoil/

 

The fact that Trump has bad lawyers is hardly news.

 

Just look at who he used to represent him during his big lie campaign. No well qualified lawyers would be foolish enough to take that case. But that dream team was always good for laughs.

 

Trump got rid of any real lawyer and faced a mutiny from the White House counsel's office because they refused to tell him what he wanted to hear, So he brought in Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani. And we have to take a step back from there. What Powell came back with was just insane from the outset You take one look at the ghost of Hugo Chavez stealing elections should have been enough for any rational person to be going no we need to be getting these insane crackpots out of the White House. But then just by common experience we know when Powell's story changed from Chavez to satellites in Italy and somehow China that's it. We know right then its all a lie because they changed their stories.

Which is fine if you are just bullshitting someone down at the bar. But this wasn't a bunch of misfit drunks down at the bar. These were people supposedly advising the POTUS in the nerve center of our Nation's capitol. And they were going on national TV with it. And that begs the question how that was allowed to go on. Fuck the insane Trump and his band of nutcases. Who was looking after the nation? Wasn't somebody or a bunch of somebodies supposed to be doing that? They even swore oaths to do that. And yet a totally insane and very dangerous situation was just allowed to go on.

When all it would have taken is a few of them to step before the cameras and microphones to go public and state they were confronting an insane situation with the POTUS and his "legal advisors" the election was not stolen and for national security reasons Trump and his legal team needed to be neutralized.

They owed us the American people that. They swore they would. And instead a whole government of what were supposed to be sane responsible adults cowered and let a mentally ill president commit treason against the United States of America and never said a word.

I will never be able to forget that let alone forgive that.

 

From the letter signed by 22 Congressional members addressed to the DOJ ...........

"..... According to Ryan-Marie Houck, Mark Houck’s wife, roughly 25 FBI agents and around 15 vehicles arrived at the Houck residence in the early morning of September 23rd and began pounding on the front door.1 The agents allegedly stated that they were going to break into the home if the door was not opened while pointing approximately five weapons at the husband, wife, and potentially children. Reportedly, this raid occurred in relation to an incident in which Mr. Houck allegedly pushed an abortion rights patient escort at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Philadelphia after the patient escort harassed and invaded the personal space of Mr. Houck’s 12-year-old son. There is much to learn about the extent of the FBI’s operations in this case, especially since state-level assault charges were apparently dismissed by local authorities in Philadelphia. 2 Surely, the FBI must have an extraordinary reason for showing up at the home of an American family, allegedly with roughly 25 heavily armed federal agents, and arresting a father in front of his seven children. At the moment, it appears to be an extraordinary overreach for political ends ...."​

So what amounts to a simple assault charge, not pursued by local officials, is fair game for a full force raid on the part of the FBI? You know, cause, abortion?​

 

The FBI should crack down on the protesters, they are becoming more and more emboldened. We have had murdered at these clinics, and I bet we will see more aggressive acts over the next few years while things sort themselves out.

And here I thought you supported abortion rights. Seems you're defending the anti-choice group.

 

Your assertion that "The FBI should crack down on protesters" is exactly why the FBI is earning a reputation as a politicized and weaponized Federal agency.

Your assertion that Shooter is "defending the anti-choice group" is incorrect.

 

Thank you.
Trying to be good, but it's so hard to behave sometimes.

 

This isn't about politicization, it is about the law! These protesters are breaking the law by interfering withe these patients and volunteers. Plus it sounds like this Yahoo is using his children to interfere with these patients!

Nice to know you encourage lawlessness!

https://www.freedomforuminstitute.o...m-of-assembly/abortion-protests-buffer-zones/

 

Shooter does not encourage lawlessness.
Local officials declined to seek criminal charges from the situation.
The rest of your post makes assumptions that are not supported by the facts.

 

They're in fact known that this guy was using his kid to obstruct access to the clinic. Not my problem you don't believe it.

 

Shooter does not encourage lawlessness.
Local officials declined to seek criminal charges from the situation.