See I told you Nancy Pelosi was going to go viral over this and you re-posting it proves my point. So thank you for that. And we can all thank Nancy Pelosi for showing us how to respond and address the fear hate and lies coming from the right. She also showed us how to respond and address hate in general. And she destroyed the right wing false propaganda noise machine talking point that the only reason Democrats are trying to impeach Trump is because they hate him. Which is a lie.

And then for bonus points the exchange also begged the question who is that asshole? And sure enough Sinclair News’ James Rosen is an asshole. He was fired from Fox for being a sexual harasser and then picked up by Sinclair Propaganda which is pretty much a laughingstock now.

But that was all just in a day's work for Pelosi who is the best and strongest Speaker of the House in modern history at least.

Here is how Nancy Pelsoi is outplaying Trump on impeachment

*We call her MAGA Haberman because she's actually a pro Trump stenographer that just writes down what Trump or anyone in the WH tells her. And this is also a good example of if you try to read what she says all you get is confused.

**Bullshit. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is five steps ahead of Trump and the Republicans and has been since the day she picked up the gavel.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/here-is-how-nancy-pelsoi-is-outplaying-trump-on-impeachment/

 

New Rasmussen Poll Finds President Trump Up Six Points Since November.
Posted at 9:00 am on December 6, 2019 by T.LaDuke



Is this a trend for the future or just a bump in the road?

With the impeachment fiasco swirling all around Washington D.C. you know that everyone will be checking where the public polling is and the one poll everyone will watch is how President Trump’s approval rating is.


So far it is good news for Trump.

According to Newsmax

*52 percent approve of Trump’s performance.

*47 percent disapprove of Trump’s performance.

*38 percent strongly approve of Trump’s performance.

*40 percent strongly disapprove of Trump’s performance.

This compares to the daily tracking poll from November 26th at Rasmussen where Trump had a favorable of 46% and 36% strongly approving of the President and 44% strongly disapproving. So what exactly does this all mean?


Being that the President is up six points since the Nov 26th tracking poll, that indicates the impeachment hearings have had the opposite effect that Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats had hoped. The number here that I find most fascinating is that the strongly disapprove has dropped by almost the same amount (4 points) and that is a very good sign for the President.

When you STRONGLY DISAPPROVE of something it usually takes something pretty significant for you to change your mind. While Rasmussen does not ask if impeachment is the reason I think that is a logical assumption here. Couple that with the strong economy and you have a good report for Trump with this year winding down.

These things are, of course, very fickle and we have a long way to go in impeachment and the Dems picking a nominee still has not happened but as of now, things are looking positive for the Trump/Pence ticket in 2020

 

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html

Pelosi gets standing ovation at Kennedy Center Honors

https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-kn...ets-standing-ovation-at-kennedy-center-honors

 

I actually think this is the best endorsement for how well Pelosi and the Democrats did negotiating a new NAFTA modification with Trump.

GOP senators worry Trump made 'problematic' concessions in trade deal

*Pelosi, just like all the rest of the world, knows Trump is so desperate and weak they can just bend him over and fuck him raw for whatever they want and all he can do is take it and give in because he's failing and needs any win he can get. But what is so hilarious is they also make the Republicans bend over and take it too because they don't dare stand up to Trump. So they can whine and cry but still have to give Pelosi what she wants.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate...mp-made-problematic-concessions-in-trade-deal

 

How ..... droll.
Trump declares new NAFTA negotiations and the despicables scream how hes fucking over our allies.

So now, its ready for congressional approval and the despicables need to get some credit for it, cause ain't no way Trump gets credit even though it was his from the start.

So, crank up that propaganda machine, despicables ,you got no credibility left anyway.

And no one to beat Trump, either.

 

Trump's most deadly enemy is Trump himself!

Thinskin

 

‘We ate their lunch’: How Pelosi got to ‘yes’ on Trump’s trade deal
After tough fights, the speaker cut a deal that unions, the president and Democrats all like.

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/10/democrats-trumps-trade-deal-080719

 

Nancy Pelosi brings down the hammer after McConnell screed: ‘Frankly, I don’t care what the Republicans say’

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/na...frankly-i-dont-care-what-the-republicans-say/

 

I don't care what the Republicans say
Not one dime, not now, not ever
Trump will never be President


And now the despicable held house hands Trump a $1.4 TRILLION bloated pork budget.
Hope he vetoes it.

 

Well no Pelosi and the Democrats have already rolled Trump and he doesn't dare to anything but go along with them.

But anyway back on topic.

Harvard’s Laurence Tribe reveals why Pelosi’s leverage move against Mitch McConnell is already winning

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/ha...e-against-mitch-mcconnell-is-already-winning/

 

Oh, yeah. Trump's demeanor shows how "rolled" he's been. Also, signs of total submission with every intention of going along with those oh-so-reasonable-and-impartial Democraps.



And delaying the transmittal of the articles to the Senate does nothing but push the trial closer to the Iowa caucuses and New Hampshire primary, ensuring that Booker, Sanders, Warren, and Klobuchar are sitting in Washington while Buttiejej, Biden, Bloomberg, Yang, and the others have less competition while campaigning in those states.

Brilliant move, Botox Betty. BRILLIANT!

 

Oh yeah. One more thing.

Directly from the US Constitution.

Pelosi doesn't get to tell the Senate how to conduct their trials, just like the Senate didn't have any say in Schiff's dungeon meetings.

 

Why Impeachment Is A Massive Blunder For Nancy Pelosi

Despite Wednesday's long-expected vote and the media cheer group accompanying it, impeachment is going terribly for the Democrats.

12/19/19


Washington, D.C. — It’s been an ugly fall in Washington. Wet, dreary and deeply stupid. In the season we’re supposed to be shopping for the perfect gift for our loved ones, instead most of us are busily shopping for a reason to give America what they say she wants more than her two front teeth: impeachment.

But despite Wednesday’s long-expected vote and the media cheer group accompanying it, this is going terribly for the Democrats.

There’s a willful suspension of belief at work in the capital city. Self-proclaimed defenders of the Constitution make excuses for sloppy spying on a major candidate for president. Men who compare themselves to those at Valley Forge shift seamlessly from allegations of urine-soaked escapades to collusion with the Kremlin, from the Kremlin to Ukraine, and finally from quid-quo-pro to bribery to obstruction, with stopovers on NFL anthem protests and insults to “The Squad.” The speaker quotes the deceased Elijah Cummings in wondering, “When we’re dancing with the angels, the question will be asked, in 2019,” did we impeach Donald Trump?

Media commentators in Washington and New York read D.C. bedtime stories about a majority of Americans backing their efforts– a statistic you would have to spend nearly all your time in New York or D.C. to remotely believe. When polls don’t fit that worldview, they’re discarded. “I don’t believe that poll for one second,” CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin balked when CNN political director David Chalian showed declining enthusiasm for a impeachment in a network poll. “David, that poll is wrong. Just because I said so.”

After the Robert Mueller Russia fiasco, it takes willful stupidity to think that a solid majority of Americans ever wanted to see this impeachment go through over a country some of them might recognize from a Risk game. But the delusions don’t end with the same polls that predicted President Hillary Clinton. From the nature of the impeachment to the lionization of its leader, media elites and their Democrat allies have misread this political situation more seriously than any since the eve of Trump’s election, when paragraphs of space were devoted to what catering reporters were eating as they awaited Her big win.

The New York Times served “an array of Greek food and Dallas BBQ” while giving Clinton an 85 percent chance of winning. Politico served chicken, shrimp and salads.

Three years later, Republicans across the board have rejected the impeachment proceedings as unjust, unfair, and undemocratic. Since Justin Amash, a libertarian who loves to disagree and gives the strong impression he annoyed classmates in his youth, became an independent five months ago, the ranks have closed. According to Wednesday’s conventional wisdom, though, this marks a new chapter in “three years of unshakable and at times irrational support for Trump.”

“Irrational.”

Democrats, the same article follows, are falling “almost uniformly” in line. Except for Democrat Reps. Jared Golden and Collin Peterson , who Wednesday voted against impeachment. And Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard, who voted present. And of course New Jersey’s Jeff Van Drew, who is telling colleagues he’s becoming a Republican in protest.

Understand that to the political press corps, a GOP that unanimously backed the president and opposed Pelosi is “at times irrational,” and three Democrats voting against their speaker and one defecting from the entire party is “almost uniformly” in line. This “conventional wisdom” is accepted by nearly the entire corporate media, and parroted to Americans forced to listen at airports and gyms across the country.

Amazingly, though, it is not nearly the greatest media distortion of even the day. For example, it is far surpassed by the worship, adoration and glorification of Madam Speaker, the Democrats’ leader in the fight.

“Her command of legislation, her control over her caucus, her ability to confront a historically hostile president and GOP-run Senate on equal terms are unparalleled,” Politico crows in a hard-hitting piece about the how the 79-year old congresswoman in office since Ronald Reagan was president “has roared back.”

“She’s the one person in Washington who can beat Trump at his own game,” Politico continues, “though she never wanted to play it.”

And the pews in the speaker’s church are just overflowing.

“Nancy Pelosi: An Extremely Stable Genius,” the New Yorker cheers.

“Political Grandmaster,” Vanity Fair crowns.

“Nancy Pelosi Has Trump Right Where She Wants Him,” Politico Magazine pretends.

“She May Not Acknowledge It, But Nancy Pelosi Is A Fashion Icon,” The Washington Post blogs.

“She,” a Food And Wine profile assures, “can also locate Paris’s best croissant.”

Casual readers will be forgiven for not knowing that the speaker has never actually beaten the president. Even on Wednesday when the addled, shaky pillar of Democrat might led impeachment, she seemingly failed to win the national argument and likely strengthened the president’s re-election prospects.

Just before the impeachment vote, while not agreeing to the number the White House asked for, Congress sent another $1.4 billion to build the president’s wall. The day after impeachment, Pelosi appears ready to pass the president’s trade deal. And since impeachment began, the president’s party gained more than 600,000 new donors and raised more than $10 million.

Of course, the president won’t be leaving office despite all the drama on CNN. Then, Washington is a town where Melania Trump is unfashionable and Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a paragon of strength and health, so these things are to be expected.

It’s not hard to guess what my glorious city will be eating this Election Day.

 

Pelosi is the one person in Washington who can beat Trump at his own game......

Now that sounds a lot like surrender.

 

The overwhelming impression I get from Pelosi is honest!

Is Trump honest PetCock?

Thinskin

 

Really terrible PR. Your total panic and desperation is actually hurting Trump way more than helping. The clips of Trump at his latest rally were all over the internet yesterday because he was babbling incoherently, sweating profusely, slurring his words, hunter orange complexion, and so bloated he could barely squint out of his little pig eyes.

How terrible Trump looked and performed was actually a story in and of itself beyond getting condemned by Republicans for insinuating John Dingell was in hell and his insane rant about dishwashers.

And you want to call attention to that? You better hope your boss doesn't see this.

Well there you go just lying out your ass again. Pelosi is not telling Moscow Mitch anything. She is simply asking him how he intends to conduct the trial so she knows which managers she needs. Moscow Mitch can run it anyway he wants. She just wants him to say how he intends to do it.

Well now the Federalist Society which is picking all Trump's unqualified judges would say that wouldn't they. But you and I both know the Federalist has a terrible track record of being proven wrong.

But it misses the point. As Pelosi said yesterday she does not care what Republicans or the Federalist say. What Pelosi cares about is this:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion, and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

Pelosi is living up to the oath of office she has taken because Trump is violating his oath of office, violating the US Constitution, and committing criminal acts for his own personal gain.

As Pelosi said from the beginning she did not want to impeach Trump and did not think he was worth it. But the crimes he has committed, is committing right now, and putting our national security as risk left her and the Democrats no choice. No one can be above the law and especially the Constitution.

And as Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said just today; "I am never afraid and rarely surprised." So the ball is in Moscow Mitch's court and he needs to make some decisions.

While at the same time Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi remains respectful of the Constitution and the office of president.

Trump Accepts Nancy Pelosi's State of the Union Invitation Amid Impeachment

https://www.thedailybeast.com/nancy...f-the-union-address-amid-impeachment?ref=home

 

See? It just goes to show you that you should focus on your own backyard.

Most recently:



Some history:


Pelosi Leads List Of Conflict Of Interest Dems


11/17/11

Ethics: As Democrats demonize Wall Street CEOs as the "greedy" fiends of the financial crisis, they've lined their own pockets — both before and after the crisis. Nancy Pelosi's just the latest example.

The former House speaker allegedly gamed financial reforms to boost her personal stock portfolio. The brewing scandal is complicated, but here's the Reader's Digest version:

After a Pelosi staffer left to lobby on behalf of credit-card giant Visa, Pelosi delayed bringing to the House floor a bill to end lucrative "swipe fees" for Visa and other credit providers.

The bill couldn't have come at a worse time for Visa. It planned to launch an $18 billion public stock offering, so stalling Hill action became a priority. The San Francisco-based company curried favor with Pelosi by pumping cash into her re-election efforts, earning its CEO a rare one-on-one meeting with the speaker.

At the same time, Visa offered her husband a VIP cut of the IPO. Paul Pelosi jumped at the offer, buying 5,000 shares at the $44 initial price. In a couple of days, the shares soared to $64. Pelosi later bought 15,000 more, raising the total value of his investment to about $5 million. In the end, the legislation Visa fought starting in 2007 was forestalled two full years.

Publicly, Nancy Pelosi has been a frequent critic of the financial industry. The commission she impaneled in 2009 to investigate the root causes of the crisis summarily indicted Wall Street honchos, while exonerating guilty Democrats, including several who had their hands in the subprime pot.

----------------------



Pelosi Admits to Breaking House Rules — Sorta


Three hour middle-of-the-night vote to break enough arms to pass a controversial Medicare bill. Democrats mad as hell. 2006 Pelosi campaign to "drain the swamp" and usher in the "most ethical Congress" in the history of … er … ethics.

Then, upon receiving the gavel as the first female Speaker in American history, Nancy Pelosi followed through on her campaign pledge, including a rules change that clearly states: “A record vote by electronic device shall not be held open for the sole purpose of reversing the outcome of such vote.”

House Rule XX, clause 2(a), as it is now known, passed the House pretty convincingly by a vote of 430-0.

So, this morning, with full restraint, I was a very good boy and wasn't snarky at all about the irony of it all. As they say on ESPN, "Let's go to the videotape."

Mills: Madam Speaker, how can you explain that vote the other night? How do you say that was not a major violation of your own rules, the extended vote?

Ms. Pelosi: It was 10 minutes. It was 10 minutes. We are talking about keeping the bill open all night as an egregious violation of the regular order.

Mills: Your rule says: “A record vote by electronic device shall not be held open for the sole purpose of reversing the outcome of such a vote.”

Ms. Pelosi: We had some people who were not present. We had to get them to the floor.

Mills: You violated your own rules.

Ms. Pelosi. I don't see it that way. I don't see it that way. I see it as an attempt on the part of Republicans to resist ethics reform. They will go to any lengths. And you see it now, because this is not about FISA [the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act]. It is also about ethics reform.

Mills: You wanted to drain the swamp.

Ms. Pelosi. We are draining the swamp, and that is exactly what we will do. I feel very confident about what happened the other night. I think it is a giant step forward. I'm proud of the history that we made to help restore the confidence of the American people in this Congress. I think that the Republicans are making a serious error — they didn't ask me for any political advice - in coming down against ethical reform in the Congress.

So let me get this straight. The most ethical Congress in history, but we need to break a few rules — not to mention a few arms along the way — so we can usher it in.

For the record, it was closer to 16 "extra" minutes that Pelosi needed, but hey, in the spirit of comity I will give her the six minutes.

Maybe Pelosi needs to craft another "time" rule. Maybe keep the same language that already exists but add at the end: "more or less" — or — "give or take.”

Maybe just carve out an exception clause so we can break the rules if it’s a really, really important ETHICS bill. That should work. Let's call it the "Pelosi 10-Minute Rule."


----------------------


Pelosi paid husband with PAC funds



10/1/08

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has directed nearly $100,000 from her political action committee to her husband’s real estate and investment firm over the past decade, a practice of paying a spouse with political donations that she supported banning last year.

Financial Leasing Services Inc. (FLS), owned by Paul F. Pelosi, has received $99,000 in rent, utilities and accounting fees from the speaker’s “PAC to the Future” over the PAC’s nine-year history.

----------------------

Yep. A veritable paragon of virtue.

 

LOL! Panic and desperation? Look in your own party's mirror, dude!

But look how much Trump is hurting!

https://news.gallup.com/poll/271691/trump-approval-inches-support-impeachment-dips.aspx

12/18/19

The president's ratings have increased six percentage points since the House of Representatives opened an impeachment inquiry against him in the fall.


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...hment-day-hits-highest-point-since-march-2017

On the morning of President Trump’s likely impeachment in the House of Representatives, Gallup released a poll showing a six-point jump in the president’s approval rating.

When House Democrats first announced their impeachment efforts in late September, Trump’s approval rating plummeted to just 39%. After weeks of testimony and the House’s decision to draft two articles of impeachment, his approval rating climbed six points to 45%.

Trump’s approval among independent voters grew eight points throughout impeachment from 34% to 42%. The poll was conducted from Dec. 2 to Dec. 15.

-------------------

Oh no! Approval rating rising? Whatever shall we do? Oh, I know. Chuckle when a panicking, desperate liberal tries to say I'm panicking and desperate. Thanks, dude. A good chuckle is always a great way to start the weekend.

 

Trump and McConnell left fuming as Pelosi turns up the heat on Republicans

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/tr...g-as-pelosi-turns-up-the-heat-on-republicans/