What a great picture I love it oh Nancy is so sexy lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol. What a great picture how to hell did you get that .,

 

All of what you have said is 100% truth, yet none of that will matter if the election regulations are not reformed and enforced.

Friendly reminder..it's not Jan.20 yet.

 

Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer

 

The Republican side for years fuck them they knew this was coming . All they wanted was Donald Trump out of there . It’s over Johnny

 

We'll see how you feel about that tune in 2 years time.

 

Chuck Schumer my hero , Literally my hero

 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has just called for the removal of Trump as president by the 25th amendment.

 

This is someone else that is in a heap of trouble when they catch up with them with the odds being very good they will.

Laptop stolen from Pelosi's office during Capitol siege

https://www.axios.com/pelosi-laptop-stolen-capitol-riot-268f364b-8695-4249-b0f3-0f28eb99ab6e.html

 

Lets see if Shooter understands this breaking news from rear admiral motherfucker.

So, Pelosi has this laptop.
Her main man, Drew Hammill, had the laptop on a conference room desk when the riots broke.
And ultimately, said laptop was stolen, obviously by those pro trump "traitors". You know, when they got into the speakers office and ransacked it. Or peed or shit on Nancy's desk.
Or whatever it was they did.

So now the concern is, what with the loss of the laptop(s), perhaps, "cybersecurity concerns", or maybe potential "National Security Equities". (Equities? Huh. Whatever that is).

Shooter has to wonder; the fuck was the laptop doing setting on a conference room desk in the first place? We know where Nancy Antoinette was, and it damn sure wasn't in her office, now, was it?

See, when Shooter was working he had a laptop.
Now, one way or the other the laptop had some confidential shit on it. Not just contracts and contacts and business notes, but payroll files and shit. Nothing national security worthy (well for awhile there, one of Shooter's laptops did have some national security type shit on it, but that's not the point).
The point is, that laptop was never out of Shooter's immediate control unless it was locked in a safe or secure cabinet.

Really. At home, if he left for any reason, no matter how long, or why, or anything, the laptop and thumbs and disks and shit all went into the secure cabinet.
When traveling that laptop was either in Shooter's briefcase and with Shooter, or (rarely) locked in the car trunk, or locked in the hotel safe.
To the point that once, when a flight attendant insisted that Shooters briefcase, with the laptop, had to be checked as baggage because of space limitations, Shooter ended up declining to board the flight. Had to take a different flight. Cost a lot of fucking money. Forced the cancelation of two appointments. Thought the boss would bite him, but he didn't. Said Shooter did the right thing. Those laptops never, ever, ever left our immediate control. Not ever.
Same with our phones when they became "smart phones". Never, ever out of our immediate control. Ever.

So, even with the excitement of a riot down the hall, what the fuck was that laptop doing, just sitting on a desk? If master Hammill found himself down the hall, you know peeing or something, when the riot broke, and that laptop was sitting on an unsecured desk, then that's on Hammill. If he ran off, avoiding the riots, and left that laptop sitting, that's on him.

Now, the article says the thing was only used for "presentations" but we don't know what that means, and we don't know if said "presentations" involved maybe sensitive (but not top secret) information.

But here's the thing;
If the laptop didn't have sensitive information on it, then the real issue is that some vermin got away with a laptop. Worth, maybe, a couple of grand. Betcha Nancy has insurance.
If the laptop did have sensitive information on it, then what the fuck was it doing unsecured? You know, just laying out on a desk where any miscreant could just pick it up and waltz off with it?

 

Speaker Pelosi tears up describing what rioters did — then calls Trump 'deranged, unhinged and dangerous'

https://www.rawstory.com/pelosi-tears-up-rioters-capitol/

 

Oh yes us conservatives are all about National Security don't ya know.

Some of your lies are more dangerous than others TRAITORS.

T H I N K　 A B O U T 　 T H I S ...

　Not only was Pelosi’s office breached, but the security of our great nation was put on jeopardy.

　Nancy is 3rd in line in succession to the Presidency. Her office and computer contain national security briefings. Who knows what was taken, read off her desktop and laptop AND PUT ONTO A THUMBDRIVE?

 

Really. We need to find out.

And, why a laptop containing NATIONAL SECURITY BRIEFINGS was left unsecured.

You'd think the chief of staff of the third most powerful person, who routinely handles secret and even TOP SECRET information would know better than to leave such secret and sensitive information unsecured.

In fact, it would almost take a concious decision to leave such a laptop unsecured.

 

Nancy Pelosi On Capitol Hill Rioters: They chose their whiteness over democracy

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 2:15 PM PT – Tuesday, January 12, 2021
The Democrat’s so-called “national healing” efforts have backfired as they attempt to turn the protests on Capitol Hill into their latest red herring to attack white privilege.

This was on peak display over a video meeting Saturday in which Nancy Pelosi attempted to echo Republican lawmakers’ non-partisan condemnation of violence in D.C., but instead described the protest as a “racially charged” event. The career politician went on to claim demonstrators had failed to wake up to her version of democracy and instead used their so-called “white privilege” to storm the Capitol building.

“There are people in this country led by the President, for the moment, who chose their whiteness over democracy,” Pelosi stated. “That’s what this is about.”

Pelosi was not the first lawmaker to turn the tragedy into a political opportunity. In a public address last week, Joe Biden, who has worked as a lawmaker for over 40 years, claimed that institutions in America allow white people to get away with more than Black people.

“No one can tell me that if that had been a group of Black Lives Matter protesting yesterday, they wouldn’t have been treated very, very differently than the mob of thugs that stormed the Capitol,” Biden said. “Well, we all know that’s true, and it is unacceptable, totally unacceptable.”

No one can tell me that if it had been a group of Black Lives Matter protestors yesterday that they wouldn’t have been treated very differently than the mob that stormed the Capitol.

We all know that’s true — and it’s unacceptable.

— Joe Biden (@joebiden) January 7, 2021

Despite condemning Biden in the first Democrat debate over what she characterized as racist policies, Kamala Harris went on to mimic his claims and described the far-left Black Lives Matter protests as “peaceful.”

We have witnessed two systems of justice: one that let extremists storm the U.S. Capitol yesterday, and another that released tear gas on peaceful protestors last summer. It’s simply unacceptable.

— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) January 7, 2021

These so-called “peaceful” Black Lives Matter protests inflicted $2 billion of damage in 2020, which made them the most costly riots in the history of our country.

After a rally in September, President Trump had warned about growing attempts of the radical left to use racially charged messages to infiltrate American institutions such as the government, media and education in an attempt to sow division in American society.

“We embrace the vision of Martin Luther King, where children are not judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character,” President Trump said. “The left is attempting to destroy that beautiful vision and divide Americans by race in the service of political power. By viewing every issue through the lens of race, they want to impose a new segregation, and we must not allow that to happen.”

Despite the left’s attempts to tie together conservatives, racists and vandals, many Republicans have pushed back, demanding the condemnation of the tragedy remain non-partisan, especially as the families of those that died still mourn.

 

President Trump condemns violence, Democrat efforts to invoke 25th Amendment

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 2:03 PM PT – Tuesday, January 12, 2021
President Trump has dismissed efforts to invoke the 25th Amendment as Democrats move against him in Congress.

While speaking at the U.S.-Mexico border wall in Texas on Tuesday, he condemned any and all violence. The President said Democrats are causing “tremendous anger, pain and division” throughout the nation

While addressing the protests at the U.S. Capitol last week, President Trump said the administration believes in respecting our nation’s great history, not tearing them down.

“Now is the time for our nation to heal and it’s time for peace and for calm,” he stated. “Respect for law enforcement and the great people within law enforcement is the foundation of the MAGA agenda.”

President Trump went on to condemn Democrat efforts of impeachment, while calling it the “greatest witch hunt in the history of politics.”

 

President Trump condemns impeachment efforts

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 1:39 PM PT – Tuesday, January 12, 2020
President Trump recently spoke out against Congress’ efforts to impeach him a second time. He communicated with reporters outside the White House on Tuesday, where he called the impeachment “dangerous” and a continuation of the “witch hunt” against his administration.

His remarks come as the House of Representatives moves forward to impeach the President after accusing him of inciting violence at the U.S. Capitol on January 6. President Trump warned the impeachment is causing anger, but insisted that he wants no violence.

“On the impeachment, it’s really a continuation of the greatest witch hunt in the history of politics…it’s absolutely ridiculous,” he stated. “This impeachment is causing tremendous anger and you’re doing it, and its really a terrible thing that they’re doing.”



President Trump refuted these claims by noting people analyzed the speech he gave before the incident occurred and thought it was “totally appropriate.”

“But they’ve analyzed my speech and my words,” he explained. “And my final paragraph, my final sentence, and everybody to the tee thought it was totally appropriate.”

President Trump’s comments mark the first time he has spoken publicly since protesters breached the Capitol Building last week and social media platforms subsequently banned him from their sites.

Meanwhile, the FBI is reportedly monitoring online plans for armed protests across the nation and Washington, D.C. leading up to Inauguration Day. The bureau also said some online posts have vowed to use violence if President Trump is removed from office through impeachment or the 25th Amendment before the inauguration.

This comes as security for the U.S. Capitol and the Inauguration Day have increased considerably since last week’s incident on the hill.

 

Pelosi confronted about stalled stimulus checks on 60 Minutes

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 11:18 AM PT – Tuesday, January 12, 2020
The mainstream media recently called out House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for holding up coronavirus relief and a second round of stimulus checks for the American people.

While speaking with CBS reporter Lesley Stahl for 60 Minutes over the weekend, Pelosi was put on blast for “not being known as a person who compromises” when it comes to working across the aisle.


“We have a responsibility to find common ground,” stated the House Speaker. “When we can’t, we must stand our ground.”


This comes as Democrats are accused of delaying the rollout of the second round of checks, which came eight months after the first round of stimulus relief.


When asked why relief was held up, Pelosi tried to shift the blame to House Republicans by accusing them of blocking the path for the measures to pass.

The House Speaker claimed Democrats held their ground and denied sending out the payments as a way to “show more respect for our heroes,” including police, health care workers and teachers. In other words, delaying payments to workers whose industries were hit the hardest during the pandemic.

Stahl highlighted Democrat losses in the House, while alleging some Americans may have voted those lawmakers out as a result of the left being unwilling to compromise.

 

Does anyone really think we need a third stimulus bill?
What if there were no payments of any kind for individuals, employed or otherwise?

 

Well, but what they do is throw some cash at us, and then pork up the package with their favorite stuff; New York Philharmonic, bail out for bankrupt cities, rewards for the faithful ... post office, you know .... payoffs.

What they toss to us is to silence us while they loot and pillage.

You know, like tossing a bone to the guard dogs.

 

One thing the despicables will surely outdo the deplorables on is the debt.

 

Unsecured!?

It was in the office of the speaker of the house in the Capitol building! Of course that is not secure anymore.

Good job!

Thinskin