anotheruser you have a few items wrong in your fundamental understanding of what is
you believe like most that anyone is attempting to subvert the second ammendment yet they are simply working within it
there were always intentions to keep arms from the mentaly and physically inept and unable
criminals were not permited firearms either in that they pose a threat to the whole of society
and at that time there was no such thing as a semi-automatic weapon
hell they still used muzzle loaders

and restricting peoples abilities to firearms by use of legislation only restricts those that follow and obey all laws and not the criminals yet the people that are in position to do anything can only restrict the law-abiding citizens and hope that it will ever be effective

in every state it is a felony to possess a firearm in the commision of any felony yet the charges are not normaly pressed because they must take only the 2 highest crimes for trial

if you truely belive that the government wants to strip you of all rights you would be correct
but not by means of gun control
they do so by means of financial servitude
soon enough everyone will work for one of a few massive companies and buy thier food, clothes, cars, homes, and all from a company store
and all will be the result of people not saying no to big business

 

I may be wrong about a few things here and there due to some technicalities, but i do know this much, the government has turned against the citizens and if they get their way we will all be government/ corporate slaves. Everything the government does is for profit for the highest in the government and anyone that stands in their way will probably be killed or imprisoned for life. Today's government is absolutely pure evil

 

you have been thier fucking puppet for almost 160 years
it was abraham lincoln that firt sold his service to personal will in mass when he forced the emancipation proclamation down the peoples throats
the mass of society did not want ti and protested it just as they protested the civil war
since then people have continuously elected people based in business above those based on civil service

it isnt a new idea that the government is killing people off hell thats been the plan for over a century

look at the new deal and the tennessee valley authority project
they did what they wanted and hired the cheapest labor possible to make it happen
go into an impoverished region and offer them anything to steal their lands to biuld something that they cant ever afford to take any advantage of like electricity

my land in kentucky is 100% secure for now because its been in the family since before it was a state and its also in the daniel boone national forrest

so before you complain too much look at who you vote for and look into their record and id bet that they have voted for things that are meant to rip you off

 

Shit, I thought it said Tranny update!

​

 

This comment says far more about you than the government. You do not post facts and insights. You post irritable attitudes as though they are the absolute truth.

 

Whether you agree or not is a right you currently have, the right to speak openly. But even that right is slowly being infringed upon.
Any person has the right to voice their opinions and impacts that circumstances have adversely affected them. You don't know "another1" curcumstances or impacts on his life, so you don't know what his particular truths may be.

I've often noticed your posts in religion and faith threads. With that being said, you might want to reference Luke 6:37, > "Judge not, and ye shall not be judged":

Rather than criticize, or attempt to demean "anotheruser1", maybe asking about what has caused particular positions on issues, may well substantiate his positions and comments as having a fundamental truth. Maybe even open things up to becoming even more interesting.

DL, you don't react well to what could be unjust criticisms, don't expect others to.

 

sadly the comment that another wrote were directly towards what i had written and he admitted that he may be missing certian pieces of information in his conclusions, which does show that at least he is willing to learn more
how can one judge a man when that man openly admits an ignorance?
i know how to punctuate, and form a correct sentence but i just dont want to
what another sees in the government is not a new agenda
yes over the decades they are in fact restricting some rights
1 being marriage
there is no reason or right for any government to regulate what defines love and the bonds of marriage
they also have no right or reason to dictate who can and cannot breed
unless those that are breeding are doing so on tax based funds

 

There's a difference between dialogue, and dismissing someone outright. You've shown that with what's transpired through the start of this post. DL unfortunately was dismissing someone outright. Something he finds offensive when it comes from others about him.
Pity, since it comes from DL, who sees himself as being both wise, and an intellectual.

 

yeah I missread that too. thaught it was going to be an intresting thread, then read the OP and was like
"ah shit another one of these threads"