The older vampire movies always scared me so I preferred the werewolf ones instead, but this lioness does loves her neck bitten, too, though so at least I have options available...

 

(Jots down a few notes where Lioness is concerned)

 

The whole premise that vampires burn up in the sun is hogwash, they don't sparkle and intercourse is nearly impossible when one's blood isn't flowing and one's heart isn't beating.

I wouldn't mind being a vampire if I could bring along a few friends.

I think of what werewolves are and their power basically is controlled by the moon's cycles. When there isn't a full moon, they get the pleasure of being normal. That is all well and good.

Though having a partner that also changed when I did would make the transition much more pleasant.

 

Agreed. Werewolves are bad ass. No emotion. No feeling. Just raw brutal.

 

The outdoor sex scene in "THE HOWLING" has always turned me on. Maybe because i was 10 when i first saw it or maybe it the whole fucking, turning into a wolf with your partner, and then going out to hunt together.

 

There is a certain seductiveness to both werewolves and vampires. I wouldn't mind siring a few people to spend an eternity with nor would it bother me to abandon my life as I knew it to roam the town in search of my next meal. Actually, both have to "search", though a vampire can literally convince you that it was your idea to follow instead of being brought against your will to a dwelling in the hills, or a dark alley where you'd be returned to the earth.

I haven't seen The Howling though I might have to check it out sometime.

 

(On the right side of my neck while being pinned face down...immobile...) Got it? Good!

 

I agree with the eroticism of being bitten on the neck. Nuzzled, nibbled, licked, sucked, bit. They were also supposed to be very hynotizing, almost to the point of the victim not having any will at all. Very dominating. All of that is sexy.

The current Hollywood version is not sexy to me. I can't see a single thing sexy about Robert Pattison (is that right??) in "Twilight." Hated the first book, hated the first movie, never saw the rest.

At the time, though, the vampire was the ultimate in taboo. Dracula was essentially a religious book. The vampire had no soul, and every myth that built up around him was basically religious in nature. He couldn't stand the light, the cross banished him, etc.

 

How can this be a mystery? People are ENTHRALLED with being SUCKED DRY!

Just look at how MANY Lawyers and Tax Collectors there ARE!

Oh and IF you want PROOF of reincarnation; the aforementioned get reincarnated as Fleas, Ticks, and Mosquitos. Hookers come back as bed bugs. Me; I'll just come back as a Fungi( fun guy).:razz:

 

Yes there were. I can think of at least two books that were decades before Bram Stokers.
The Vampyre by John Polidori (about 80 years before Stoker)
Varney The Vampire by James Rymer (about 50 years before)
Varney The Vampire is the most influential since almost all of the modern books and film stories are based on his works.

Bram Stokers Dracula is just the most successful and well known book though.

 

​

 

Vampires have been involved in myths throughout the world, very much like dragons and the flooding of the world.

I have not read Varney the Vampire, I will have to look for that one and give it a read.