One just might rightly assume the polling is conducted by elitists in an attempt to sway elections. It's not like that hasn't been tried before.

 

The Trump administration, after years of litigation, has settled lawsuits with Tea Party and other conservative groups who say they were unfairly targeted by the IRS under the Obama administration.



Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced early Thursday that the Justice Department had entered into settlements with Tea Party groups whose tax-exempt status was significantly delayed by the IRS dating back to 2013, “based solely on their viewpoint or ideology.”

 

Because I expect posters like you to disregard credible polls for ideological reasons, I posted a survey from Rasmussen Reports. It is biased in favor of Republicans.

 

The true test will come in 3 years.....

President Trump has 128 million followers across all his social media platforms so it is not as if people
dont know what he is doing or thinking on almost any subject.....

This president has been in front of the people on TV and the press more than any president I can remember.

Polls at this point are meaningless.....they lost all creditably last year....

 

You forget. Many people will not listen to anything Trump has to say. They wait until they are told what to think by people who pick one word out of a paragraph to complain about. They never really know what Trump is talking about. They damn sure know what the one word he might have said that they could bend to mean something different.

 

Yes, what did Obama do to divide the people? Please be specific by citing his words and actions.

 

Except for the simple fact she won the popular vote...

 

Hatred of the Clinton's has always puzzled me.

They are not evil. Their politics are not extreme.

 

Dog, yes they are evil. What some people think is their politics is not really their politics. What they want people to believe their politics are is far from what their politics really are.

 

Obama did not try to divide the American people. Nevertheless, whenever there was a racial incident, which is to say whenever a black criminal was killed by a white police officer, or in George Zimmerman's case, a white civilian patrolling his neighborhood, Obama took the black side. He did little or nothing to condemn the black ghetto riots that erupted whenever this happened.

Obama lost his chance to be a post racial president when he said, "If I had a son he would look like Trayvon Martin." Trayvon Martin was a black ghetto thug who had been expelled from school. He attacked George Zimmerman from behind, and began hitting him in the face. Zimmerman attacked Martin in self defense. There never should have been a trial.

 

What have they done that is so evil?

 

How about the whole Russian deal with the uranium?

 

Snopes

Allegations of a "quid pro quo" deal giving Russia ownership of one-fifth of U.S. uranium deposits in exchange for $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation are unsubstantiated...

The Uranium One deal was not Clinton’s to veto or approve

Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can’t veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself “never intervened” in committee matters.

Despite transfer of ownership, the uranium remained in the U.S.

A key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported, and remained under the control of U.S.-based subsidiaries of Uranium One, according to a statement by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

NRC’s review of the transfer of control request determined that the U.S. subsidiaries will
remain the licensees, will remain qualified to conduct the uranium recovery operations, and will continue to have the equipment, facilities, and procedures necessary to protect public health and safety and to minimize danger to life or property. The review also determined that the licensees will maintain adequate financial surety for eventual decommissioning of the sites. Neither Uranium One nor ARMZ holds an NRC export license, so no uranium produced at either facility may be exported.

The timing of most of the donations does not match

Of the $145 million allegedly contributed to the Clinton Foundation by Uranium One investors, the lion’s share — $131.3 million — came from a single donor, Frank Giustra, the company’s founder. But Giustrasold off his entire stake in the company in 2007, three years before the Russia deal and at least 18 months before Clinton became secretary of state.
https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/

The fact that so many people believe bizarre charges against Bill and Hillary demonstrates the demented nature of Clinton hate.

 

Dog, did Bill Clinton ever get money from Russia?
Did the Clinton foundation ever receive any money from Russia?

 

They are both Globalists before Americans,, on a personal level...that's fine, as American politicians...that's not fine.

 

That still is not evil.

On immigration I agree more with Trump than Bill and Hillary.

 

From what I have been able to find out about this, the amount seems to have been very small, and the uranium remained in the United States.

 

What makes the polls you are touting now any more credible than the polls you posted last year with regards to the 2016 presidential election?

 

Your statement demonstrates how many on the right in the United States have come to occupy a fact free environment, where the only thing that matters is what they want to believe.

The polls predicted a close election with Hillary Clinton getting slightly more of the votes than Donald Trump. That is what did happen.

Those of your persuasion have used this as an excuse to disregard all polls, even when they demonstrate that Donald Trump and his tax cuts for the rich are unpopular by large margins.

 

The fact is, the polls you posted with regards to the 2016 presidential election were wrong, false and misleading....