"love them, hate them". lol. Yes, I just positively LOVE paedophiles

Honestly? Indifference

 

Slow painful death Po

While I can make the distinction between an 18 yo having a consensual relationship with a 15 yo (illegal in my state), anyone who violates an innocent child should be put to death. If a sick fucker like that came to my neighborhood he would move or live a very miserable life. No tolerance for those that take advantage of the young, old, or handicapped. If I ever caught someone messimg with my daughter their face would be on a milk carton for good.

 

Really?

Really people? Have yall not seen HALF the stories n some of the posts on some of the groups lol half of us ARE pedo's

 

I think it is a double edged sword to have those kinds of stories on here.
I think in some cases if a person wants to read those stories to get off and fulfill some kind of fantasy.. Cool.. Read all the stories you want if it prevents you from acting on it.

However, I do also feel these stories could cause someone to act on these urges.

I personally think pedophilia is disgusting. There is nothing appealing about children or pre-teens. I have lived in a few neighborhoods that had registered sex offenders of all types.. It doesn't bother me at all, but you bet your ass I sit outside on the porch a lot and keep an eye on all the children around.

 

don't try to rationalize shit with me. when you have attended one of your best friends little sisters funerals, let me know if your opinion changes. Until then fuck off

 

I think it is a double edged sword to sell guns in shops. I think in some cases, if a person wants to buy a gun they don't have to get it from an established business. They're sold by some people who have them in their possession illegally. Cool. Supply and demand. If you want to kill someone, you must have a good enough reason.

However, I do also feel (that) these weapons could convince one person to kill the other.

I personally think murder is disgusting. There is nothing appealing about shoving the barrel of a .357 Smith & Wesson in someone's mouth and threatening to pull the trigger. I have lived in a few neighborhoods where bullets were flying literally across the street. If one of those hit me or mine, I'd certainly retaliate something serious with my arsenal of weaponry. :|

 

No charge for dad who killed daughter's rapist!

Sounds justifiable to me!
http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2012/06/20/19900091.html

 

Define "pedophile" as you mean it. Because I've heard people use that term to talk about men who are attracted to 15 year olds. I am of course for harsh treatment of any child rapist (Meaning forced sex) and do not condone adults trying to trick, pressure, etc anyone under age into doing things they don't want. But if there is some sort of curiosity satisfying activity or something involving a sexually mature child which they may instigate I am not one to say the adult should be killed or jailed for 20 years. That being said I am also against anyone worrying about strictly fantasy erotica including writings or drawings. And before someone says, "Yes but that might encourage someone to do it for real", I agree but then that applies to any sort of crime so why just single out this one?

 

I have seen a number of replies that seem to take the attitude that paedophiles are just unlucky because they happen to be sexually aroused by children.

I don't think this paints a real picture of paedophiles. I would suspect that such people are extremely rare if they exist at all.

I imagine that most if not all paedophiles are just people who take the opportunity to have sex with a child because they can, or because they find it an extra turn on because it is taboo and risky. If they have been victims of abuse themselves it makes it easier for them to justify this behaviour in their own minds.

In essence the act of child abuse is based entirely on satisfying one's own sexual needs, either with total disregard to the victim or under the premise of some twisted logic that they are actually doing the child some kind of benefit by their "loving" actions.

I would bet money that these people are just as sexually attracted towards adults as anyone else. The truth of this can be seen by the fact that most abusers are actually family men who have fathered children themselves.

So it makes me somewhat angry in truth when people say "they can't help what they are attracted to", I think that's bullshit and diminishes the responsibility of these abusers.

 

Really? Are you people fucking retarted? Born with urges but never act on them??? Any sick fuck that thinks about fucking children, male or female, deserves to die. I have an 18 month old daughter and this scares the shit out of me. I have a female cousin that was 6 when a child molester moved in her neighborhood. I was arrested when I knocked on his door and showed him a loaded 45 and told him id kill him if i ever so much as saw him look at my cousin. Charges were dismissed, but I dont see what I did wrong. I think it was nice to give him a warning and not blow him away for his past crimes that the U.S. government doesnt punish rightfuly......

 

The gene pool needs some chlorine...... And that's all I'm gonna say about that

 

a pedophile is generally a grown man or woman (but can be a teenage boy or girl) who is sexually attracted to those twelve and under, thats it. if the attraction is there then that person is a pedophile. someone is a pedophile before they rape or pressure a child into sex or even willingly. he or she is a pedophile based on their attraction. okay, now i might be wrong, i'm not saying i am right, but that is the way i see it.

the pro-pedophile movement in the united states says they want to leave sex up to the child. the child can say no, or hopefully (to the pedophile), yes.

what about this world we live in, i was just ignored before with my last message. could a pedophile be seen as being so evil that that person is seen as a terrorist or something else far greater than one attracted to children? if you anti-pedos out there had the power, would you demonise a pedophile in a way that had people see that person as evil? but it is really you and your intolerance? am what i'm speaking of here possible?

 

You can not seriously talk about tolerance of paedophiles like they are some unfortunate group of people with a medical condition.

Let me be clear, to me a paedophile is someone who acts on their desires or encourages others to do so, not someone who occasionally fantasises about it without ever promoting the idea to anybody else that it is acceptable. I have always said people's fantasies are their own business so long as they remain just fantasies.

So for my definition I would say a paedophile is definitely more evil than a terrorist. Hell, I don't even consider terrorists evil, misguided yes, but they are doing what they believe to be right. They are not using a vulnerable child for their own sexual pleasure like a piece of meat. Now that is what I call evil.

 

so if medications prescribed to treat pedophiles cause them a lower libido physically, do the drugs not treat them mentally as well?

we are in 2012, i think we have a little way to go yet before we have the ability to read and control minds. when we get there, would such technology (as it would be technology) be used to monitor pedophiles?

i know of one publicised sex offender in my country, he is not a pedophile, who is being tracked by global positioning satellite! this was approved by the ministry of justice! but that is a far cry from that, trespassing, torture and no freedom of thought, he has it easy. there is a theory that that is what will happen en masse with the establishment of the police state (more to do with the united states).

 

Personally, I do hate the pedo's, gay's and lez's.
Still, in the real world, I did help, in my country, the gay and lez people to become legal.
Now, back to pedos - we don't need to feel anything towards them - we do have laws and prisons for them...

Stilll...
When he was in his eighth grade, my son did have an English teacher who, if she ever would have tried to fuck my son, I surely wouldn't have made any complaints!
She was in her twenties, but, honestly, if I didn't know she was my son's teacher, I would of thought she was maximum 18! :excited:
(Un) fortunately she lives relatively close to my house and... there are already a few years since I've ceased "fooling around"!
Otherwise...

 

Okay curve-ball here,

What if your 15 year old son want to see, and finds, porn with "girls his age"...

What if your 19 year old son IS the pedophile?

What if your 19 year old DAUGHTER "experiments" while babysitting?


oh and as recently as the early 1800s people had no problem at all with 20 something men MARRYING there 15 year old daughters...

 

At the age of 11, my 28 yr.old female organ teacher and I started a sexual relationship. I was fully cognizant that it was a taboo issue being raised in a hypocritically religious household. It was a consensual action on my part to join in. I took it as a learning experience for later life and a 'one up' on my other male friends. To this day I hold no ill will toward her for our relationship. Again, it was my choice to enter into it.
The use of underage people against there will is totally wrong and should be punished by the prevailing law of the land. But not only does the age of the person matter but the corresponding rationale level of the individual must be considered I believe.
We hear of the high school junior (17 or so) having an affair with their 30-something teacher. I find it hard to believe they were innocent angels and not knowing what they were doing. Only after mom and dad saw the text on their phone does it become an issue for them. Until then they're having a great time.
And I don't believe it's a curable affliction either. No magic little pill here. The rationale of the consenting participants is the issue. I just don't know how one guage's the rationale.

 

not just kids i am 30 and still ant make a logical decision lol

 

Thinking about and acting out are two different things. Anyone can think about anything they want, but the moment they act, then they should be held responsible. If they have acted upon a child, 12 or under, then being held responsible includes a lot of pain and suffering. Anyone that rapes a young child, that the scum in Texas was trying to, then the deserve no tolerance or mercy, and they get what they get. The father in Texas deserves a pat on the back for doing what needed to be done. Some bastard that preys on children too young to even know what is happening, deserves a bullet through the head, or public lynching, or even televised torture. What others have described as "treatment" is too good for them. This is the treatment they deserve.

 

My biggest problem with Pedos is the fact that they know they are harming a child. Emotionally and phsycologically. And they still don't give a fuck. What I'm saying is maybe they can't help what they are attracted to but they can help not hurt a child by not acting on it. It's called being an adult and doing the responsible thing. There's therapy. There's some medication out (don't feel like googling to get the name of it) that takes away your sex drive. There's also the simpler thing of avoiding children.

We all have come across a situation where we could have had sex with someone we shouldn't. When I was 19 my drunk Brother's fiance came on to me two months before her wedding. I brushed her off. What seperates us from animals is the ability to reason. Use it. Emotionally scarring a child for life because you want to "get off" is the epitome of selfish. God damnit, control yourselves. Stop making excuses that you can't help yourself because YOU CAN. I would have my penis removed before I would even think about putting it in a child.

THIS is the reason I think most people want to resort to violence when dealing with pedos. Choosing to do the wrong thing and not caring how it effects an innocent child.