L+R, I have a question.

Does it always take you three years to think of a response to a thread?

Just wondering. You know I love ya, right?

 

At least I respond, not like some people.​

Some people switch profiles like deck chairs on the Titanic.​

I don't suppose you would happen to know who they might be?​

 

I am not aware of most socks, nor do I care if they don't do any harm to the forum. Yours are quite obvious, though. I still don't understand why you need 70.

 

Think of a post like a time capsule, an undiscovered grecian urn.​

Just waiting for the right moment to be dug up.​

With a conservative 50,000 placed, some are deliberately obvious. ​

Others well, only time will tell :excited:​

"that is all ye know on xnxx, and all ye need to know"​

 

Most people aren't, but unlike you they think they are. One mod in particular is quite convincing and I laugh out loud sometimes when others take what she says verbatim because she's a mod. Silly me, I'm sure others don't see the humor. :excited:

 

Like! :excited:

 

Perhaps I'm too stupid to see the point of this thread. . .

I doubt it. . . but it's possible.

 

It's possible. . . but I doubt it.

 

SEE????

Another doubter . . .

apparently we're in the majority

 

View attachment ​

 

and internet sex-site power corrupts internet sex-site powerluteley . . .

I am humbled.

 

You see, moderators always win, unless something publicly startling is bought to the table :excited:

I wonder if there is something so controversial, something so disgusting, something so wrong, just sitting out there, waiting for maximum effect, to be produced on a site?

Something that two moderators, will be tarred with, permanently!

Something that will irrecovably change the way those people are seen?

Something that will make those usernames, quite frankly, inoperable?

I wonder :excited:

 

Stop wondering. The only person whose opinion matters one iota when it comes to the moderators, is the admin. Nothing that becomes public will make the slightest difference to them.

 

Hey, Brainiac..... Guess again. If something public effects the business it'll make the admins do whatever needs to be done to protect it.

 

Welcome to hell :-E

 

One would imagine that to affect the business as a whole, this 'controversial something' that lnr has been alluding to would have to be something illegal.

Although I doubt lnr would actually state what he's on about, because then he'd have all his cards on the table and if it turned out to be nothing - as is what I suppose - then that's exactly what he's left with...a big fat nothing.

This of course will not be what he wants. He assumes that alluding to something gives him an air of mystery, I'm sure...makes people assume he knows more than he does and he's somewhat of a 'player behind the scenes' as opposed to an ineffectual shit-stirrer.

I could be wrong, of course, but I doubt it.

 

LnR is a little, loudmouth shit stirrer.... You're not wrong. He's blowing smoke up people's asses for effect and he's a legend in his own mind. I don't think anybody with a brain would seriously believe he's a player.

If someone did air something that could harm the business, I'm sure the admin's would act to protect it. LnR, the little stirrer, I highly doubt has anything that could be damaging.

 

Let's put a timeline on a few things shall we:

I sent a pm to all three mods about something (the new mod was not appointed then).
I get various replys back but none took the matter to admin as I requested.
I then pm smcaaphd a second time and she flatly declined to approach admin.
I then pm admin and get no reply.

The admin comes online and appoints a new moderator.
The admin comes online and changes clarise's title.
The admin visits various people's home pages.
Did the admin respond to my pm? No

He must have been too busy.....


No need for a colored version anymore, is there?

(No pm was harmed during the context of this post)

 

Keep blowing that smoke you spineless little worm...... I know who and what you are you brain damaged Aussie.

 

If I understand the way this place works correctly if L+R goes into the specifics of what he is alluding to he will be breaking the rules, am I right?

And IF he breaks the rules he is liable to find himself banned, is that also correct?

If I am right how, then, does L+R clarify his position in a manner that will satisfy the doubters (I have no opinion either way) and prove his point?

It appears to be another shining example of the slanted way in which this forum is run; slanted in favour of the mods and admin.

Welcome to the XnXX version of 'democracy', right?